본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

2000년대 한국 소설의 생태학적 고찰 -한강, 편혜영, 박형서, 김태용의 소설을 중심으로

An Ecological Study of the 2000s Korean Novels -With novels of Han Gang, Pyun Hey-Young, Park Hung-Sue, and Kim Tae-Yong

2

조회

0

다운로드

16

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류문학

초록

This theme will be an opportunity to see from Han Gang, Pyun Hey-Young, Park Hung-Sue, and Kim Tae-yong’s novels a scene of ecology that intensely breathes in Korean young novels, which are produced despite the holistic global crisis in the 2000s, and to check the present and future of Korean novels through this. As has been broadly verified, the ecological crisis originated from the course of modernization. The progression oriented industrialization and its driving force, scientific technology are products of the reason, which is separated from the body. Modernity represents the rationality based on the reason and the view of world concentrating on the human being. As modern literature generally realizes such a system of the modern in content and form, the ecological and the modern literary crises form a weird community sharing a common destiny. The human’s blind attachment to modernization brings about an ecological end, which means the end of nature, and of the world. Not to mention humans, history, and literature, there will have been nothing left. The world that the past literature supported with imagination will not gain energy, and then endangered Homo Oecologicuses will float on the gloomy and ruinous earth. From the last century’s novels that were created by writers like Yeom Sangseop, O Yeong-su, Jo Se-hi, Lee Mun-gu, Kim Won-il, and Yun Hu-myeong etc., we can see such aspects in which the great ideologies progressed world-historically and ecological elements in industrialization adaptively percolate. On the other hand, in the 21st century’s novels created by young Korean writers including Baek Min-seok, Han Gang, Cheon Un-yeong, Phun Hey-Young etc.,ecology works characteristically in tandem with the fragmented and itemized subject matters that they intend to. This is especially prominent in novels by the young writers-Han Gang, Pyun Hey-Young, Park Hung-Sue, and Kim Tae-yong. Han Gang dreams of the ecological metamorphosis, Pyun Hey-Young concentrates the destruction of the human and nature, and their grotesque transformations with cruel hard?gore techniques, Park Hung-Sue and Kim Tae-yong use the method of paranoia and fantasy. The novel, which has breathed together with the mankind so far,cannot be satisfied with the function of entertainment is that the 21st century’s young Korean writers including Han Gang, Pyun Hey-Young, Park Hung-Sue, and Kim Tae-yong are connecting themselves with ecology with powerful vital energies that overthrow the ethos of modernization while creating new aesthetics of the novel now.

Abstract

This theme will be an opportunity to see from Han Gang, Pyun Hey-Young, Park Hung-Sue, and Kim Tae-yong’s novels a scene of ecology that intensely breathes in Korean young novels, which are produced despite the holistic global crisis in the 2000s, and to check the present and future of Korean novels through this. As has been broadly verified, the ecological crisis originated from the course of modernization. The progression oriented industrialization and its driving force, scientific technology are products of the reason, which is separated from the body. Modernity represents the rationality based on the reason and the view of world concentrating on the human being. As modern literature generally realizes such a system of the modern in content and form, the ecological and the modern literary crises form a weird community sharing a common destiny. The human’s blind attachment to modernization brings about an ecological end, which means the end of nature, and of the world. Not to mention humans, history, and literature, there will have been nothing left. The world that the past literature supported with imagination will not gain energy, and then endangered Homo Oecologicuses will float on the gloomy and ruinous earth. From the last century’s novels that were created by writers like Yeom Sangseop, O Yeong-su, Jo Se-hi, Lee Mun-gu, Kim Won-il, and Yun Hu-myeong etc., we can see such aspects in which the great ideologies progressed world-historically and ecological elements in industrialization adaptively percolate. On the other hand, in the 21st century’s novels created by young Korean writers including Baek Min-seok, Han Gang, Cheon Un-yeong, Phun Hey-Young etc.,ecology works characteristically in tandem with the fragmented and itemized subject matters that they intend to. This is especially prominent in novels by the young writers-Han Gang, Pyun Hey-Young, Park Hung-Sue, and Kim Tae-yong. Han Gang dreams of the ecological metamorphosis, Pyun Hey-Young concentrates the destruction of the human and nature, and their grotesque transformations with cruel hard?gore techniques, Park Hung-Sue and Kim Tae-yong use the method of paranoia and fantasy. The novel, which has breathed together with the mankind so far,cannot be satisfied with the function of entertainment is that the 21st century’s young Korean writers including Han Gang, Pyun Hey-Young, Park Hung-Sue, and Kim Tae-yong are connecting themselves with ecology with powerful vital energies that overthrow the ethos of modernization while creating new aesthetics of the novel now.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 김태용, "풀밭위의 돼지" (2007), 문학과지성사
  2. 박형서, "토끼를 기르기전에 알아두어야할 것들" (2003), 문학과지성사
  3. 편혜영, "아오이가든" (2005), 문학과지성사
  4. 한강, "내 여자의 열매" (2000), 창비
  5. 한강, "채식주의자" (2007), 창비
  6. 김선학, "21세기 한국문학과 생태주의. in: 한국문학평론" (2002), 국학자료원
  7. 김욱동, "문학생태학을 위하여" (1998), 민음사
  8. 김형중, "변장한 유토피아" (2006), 랜덤하우스
  9. 김형중, "단 한권의 책" (2008), 문학과지성사
  10. 박진, "장르들과 접속하는 문학의 스펙트럼", 창작과비평, (여름) (2008)
  11. 이광호, "이토록 사소한 정치성" (2006), 문학과지성사
  12. 전혜자, "한국 현대생태소설의 서사적 유형과 분석" (2007), 새미
  13. 정화열, "몸의 정치와 예술, 그리고 생태학" (2005), 아카넷
  14. 조남현, "한국소설과 환경생태학", 문학동네, (여름) (2001), 문학동네
  15. 채수영, "문학생태학" (1997), 새미
  16. Ackerman, D., "감각의 박물학" (2004), 작가정신
  17. Artaud, A., "나는 고흐의 자연을 다시 본다-사회가 자살시킨 사람 반 고흐" (2003), 도서출판 숲
  18. Forster, E. M., "소설의 이해" (1990), 문예출판사
  19. Goodal, J., "희망의 밥상" (2005), 사이언스북스
  20. Kojin, K., "근대문학의 종언" (2006), 도서출판b
  21. Simon, A., "기호와 몽상" (1999), 동문선
  22. Tonelly, F., "잔혹성의 미학" (2001), 동문선

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)