박경리『토지』의 창작방법론 연구 -생명사상과 관련하여
A study on the writing methology of Land by Park Kyong-ni, focused on lifology of Donghak
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Land has been intensively studied in terms of form and subject. The form of Land is different from the previous concept of the historical novel and topic of Land has been controversial because it was very complex. The focus of this study is associated with this very controversial. A novel methodology, this study focuses on the creation of the Land is. Her writing style is related to the dynamics of the life history. It also raised earlier stylistic clues are thematic to resolve the confusion. First, the idea of Gyeongmul produced a variety of main characters in this novel. Gyeongmul is to respect all creatures. Everyone is a hero in Land. Everything is close to the main character hero, rather than absence. In other words, qualified like Ttochulne things even exist in the historical events depicting the life of the non-native, as many people close to the bit of the story unfolds each one is a hero to all things, this means that Land selected is determined that, all things in the basal Gyeongmul of Honor ever lies. Second, the notion of Sangsaeng (harmony in all living things)produced the imagination space of readers. In addition, this writer supply the reader’s creative imagination space that provides tension and you feel that you are in a new aesthetic experience. Third is the notion of Bulyongiyon (Not being so and yet being so),which is also as Park kyong-ni’s ideology. This novel shows embracing inconsistency of logic. The relationship between individual and the whole creatures is based on discontinuity of logic. Narrative is being repetitive in this novel and meaning is defined by different views. Like life and death, along with the acceptance of extreme contradictions of life that is born able to recognize the existence of the author recognizes the foundation Bulyongiyon tells us that based on. Other events like the scene in time and re-affirmed the denial meaning through a process of recognition is to foster the development. And Bulyongiyon In the novel, the reason for recall,summary, and repeated over and created scene. Land is controversial work. This work changes the form itself as a dynamic and has several discourses that encompass topics as well as the author’s view of the world. It gives creative and varied impacts to the reader. The yardstick of creativity is whether it has melody and rhythm. In other words, Gyeongmul, coexistence, lifology, are aesthetics of the artist’s unique writing.
Abstract
Land has been intensively studied in terms of form and subject. The form of Land is different from the previous concept of the historical novel and topic of Land has been controversial because it was very complex. The focus of this study is associated with this very controversial. A novel methodology, this study focuses on the creation of the Land is. Her writing style is related to the dynamics of the life history. It also raised earlier stylistic clues are thematic to resolve the confusion. First, the idea of Gyeongmul produced a variety of main characters in this novel. Gyeongmul is to respect all creatures. Everyone is a hero in Land. Everything is close to the main character hero, rather than absence. In other words, qualified like Ttochulne things even exist in the historical events depicting the life of the non-native, as many people close to the bit of the story unfolds each one is a hero to all things, this means that Land selected is determined that, all things in the basal Gyeongmul of Honor ever lies. Second, the notion of Sangsaeng (harmony in all living things)produced the imagination space of readers. In addition, this writer supply the reader’s creative imagination space that provides tension and you feel that you are in a new aesthetic experience. Third is the notion of Bulyongiyon (Not being so and yet being so),which is also as Park kyong-ni’s ideology. This novel shows embracing inconsistency of logic. The relationship between individual and the whole creatures is based on discontinuity of logic. Narrative is being repetitive in this novel and meaning is defined by different views. Like life and death, along with the acceptance of extreme contradictions of life that is born able to recognize the existence of the author recognizes the foundation Bulyongiyon tells us that based on. Other events like the scene in time and re-affirmed the denial meaning through a process of recognition is to foster the development. And Bulyongiyon In the novel, the reason for recall,summary, and repeated over and created scene. Land is controversial work. This work changes the form itself as a dynamic and has several discourses that encompass topics as well as the author’s view of the world. It gives creative and varied impacts to the reader. The yardstick of creativity is whether it has melody and rhythm. In other words, Gyeongmul, coexistence, lifology, are aesthetics of the artist’s unique writing.
참고문헌 (29)
- 박경리, "土地" (1994), 솔
- 박경리, "작가는왜쓰는가. in: 꿈꾸는 자가 창조한다" (1994), 나남출판
- 박경리, "한국문학의 전통과 그 맥잇기-좌담", 現代文學, pp.62~ (1994)
- 박경리, "문학을 지망하는 젊은이들에게" (1995), 현대문학
- 박경리, "생명의 아픔" (2004), 이룸
- 김영민, "박경리의 문학관 연구. in: 토지와 박경리 문학", pp.203~221 (1996), 솔
- 김원규, "텍스트의 구도와 단역인물의 의미. in: 한국근대문화와 박경리의 토지", pp.288~349 (2008), 소명출판
- 김지하, "생명" (1995), 솔
- 김진석, "소내하는 한의 문학. in: 한, 생명, 대자대비", pp.235~289 (1994), 솔
- 나병철, "토지의 시점 연구. in: 토지와 박경리 문학", pp.91~122 (1996), 솔
- 송재영, "소설의 넓이와 깊이. in: 恨과 삶", pp.19~54 (1994), 솔
- 신일철, "동학사상의 이해" (1995), 사회비평사
- 심원섭, "박경리의 생명사상 연구. in: 토지와 박경리 문학", pp.299~327 (1996), 솔
- 이경숙, "한국 생명사상의 뿌리" (2001), 이화여자대학교출판부
- 이돈화, "천도교창건사" (1933), 천도교중앙종리원
- 이상진, "土地연구" (1999), 월인
- 이정우, "사건의 철학" (2003), 철학아카데미
- 정현기, "박경리의 토지 연구. in: 한과 삶", pp.279~315 (1994), 솔
- 정호웅, "토지의 주제-한, 생명, 대자대비. in: 한, 생명, 대자대비", pp.199~217 (1994), 솔
- 최유찬, "토지를 읽는다" (1996), 솔
- 황현산, "생명주의 소설의 미학. in: 한, 생명, 대자대비", pp.11~29 (1994), 솔
- 김재현, "김지하의 생명사상과 유토피아 의식", 시대와 철학, 12(1), pp.7~33 (2001), 한국철학사상연구회
- 김현숙, "박경리 문학의 생명사상", 한중인문학연구, (24), pp.47~74 (2008), 한중인문학회
- 박상민, "박경리 『토지』에 나타난 동학(東學) - 소멸하지 않는 민족 에너지의 복원", 문학과 종교, 14(1), pp.91~116 (2009), 한국문학과종교학회
- 박소정, "동학과 도가사상-불연기연의 논리를 중심으로", 동학학보, (5), pp.143~175 (2003)
- 서경요, "檀君說話의 生命意識 硏究", 동양철학연구, (50), pp.129~158 (2007), 동양철학연구회
- 이정희, "동학의 생명원리와 생명윤리", 동학학보, 12(1), pp.153~190 (2008), 동학학회
- 임금희, "토지에 나타난 東學 연구", 문명연지, (1), pp.139~220 (2000), 한국문명학회
- 정혜정, "불교를 통해 본 동학의 생명적 사유와 만물일체", 동학학보, 12(2), pp.65~92 (2008), 동학학회
