본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

혁신적인 시의 일반성

The Generality of Innovative Poetry

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

For innovative poets, reality is a process of constant change, where things move within the flux of each moment’s change, thus possessing particularity that cannot be generalized. Therefore, many of them demand experience faithful to the momentary contexts of reality, and sincerity to express the consciousness of experience as it is. Thus, poetry can secure the particularity of reality, gaining the status of an object in itself. On the other hand, Bernstein argues that reality and consciousness are both products of language, and innovative poems that pursue sincerity end up conveying generalized experiences. Therefore, he seeks to actively create new reality rather than reproducing socially regulated experiences, thereby poetry becomes an object of experience in itself, giving rise to particular experiences rather than representing generalized experiences. However, new language uses of innovative poetry also function as signs, conceptual or perceptual, which represent not things but their culturally defined types, thus inevitably involving generality. Therefore, discarding the representation of external reality and embodying consciousness through new language uses should be seen as an effort to make the experience of poetry closer to reality, or to create new consciousness outside of societal control, while still retaining a degree of generality.

Abstract

For innovative poets, reality is a process of constant change, where things move within the flux of each moment’s change, thus possessing particularity that cannot be generalized. Therefore, many of them demand experience faithful to the momentary contexts of reality, and sincerity to express the consciousness of experience as it is. Thus, poetry can secure the particularity of reality, gaining the status of an object in itself. On the other hand, Bernstein argues that reality and consciousness are both products of language, and innovative poems that pursue sincerity end up conveying generalized experiences. Therefore, he seeks to actively create new reality rather than reproducing socially regulated experiences, thereby poetry becomes an object of experience in itself, giving rise to particular experiences rather than representing generalized experiences. However, new language uses of innovative poetry also function as signs, conceptual or perceptual, which represent not things but their culturally defined types, thus inevitably involving generality. Therefore, discarding the representation of external reality and embodying consciousness through new language uses should be seen as an effort to make the experience of poetry closer to reality, or to create new consciousness outside of societal control, while still retaining a degree of generality.

참고문헌 (8)

  1. Bernstein, Charles, "Poetic Justice" (1979), Pod Books
  2. Bernstein, Charles, "Content’s Dream: Essays 1975-1984" (1986), Sun & Moon
  3. Bernstein, Charles, "Close Listening" (1998), Oxford UP
  4. Chandler, Daniel, "Semiotics the Basics" (2002), Routledge
  5. Eco, Umberto, "A Theory of Semiotics" (1976), Indiana UP
  6. Middleton, Peter, "The Contemporary Poetry Reading", pp.262~299, Bernstein, Close Listening
  7. Nichols, Bill, "Ideology and the Image" (1981), Indiana UP
  8. Peirce, Charles S., "Collected Papers" (1931), Harvard UP

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)