본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

소리시—‘존재의 언어’와 지각적 의미

‘Language of Presence’ and Perceptual Meaning

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

In its restricted sense, ‘sound poetry’ refers to the poetic performance that rejects words and verbal meaning and instead foregrounds the aural materiality of poetry. Behind this seeking for materiality lies a quest for a ‘language of presence,’ which operates through a denial of signification toward an ideal of the Adamic tongue, a purely emotional and universal language. In the same light, it is argued that sound poetry is a unique and unrepeatable event devoid of meaning due to its directness to the body allowing no intervention of intellectual and semiotic process. But language may involve perceptual meaning as well as verbal or conceptual meaning ascribed to words. This implies that even though devoid of conceptual meaning by means of using grammatically non-articulated sounds,sound poetry cannot but have meaning whose articulation is differently, i.e.,iconically made about the aural features of the sounds. Perceptual meaning is unavoidable because everything we are conscious of is a reduced form, a repeatable pattern that works as a sign. ‘Language of presence’ is then actually impossible, and therefore sound poetry should be seen rather as a fest of diverse perceptual meanings.

Abstract

In its restricted sense, ‘sound poetry’ refers to the poetic performance that rejects words and verbal meaning and instead foregrounds the aural materiality of poetry. Behind this seeking for materiality lies a quest for a ‘language of presence,’ which operates through a denial of signification toward an ideal of the Adamic tongue, a purely emotional and universal language. In the same light, it is argued that sound poetry is a unique and unrepeatable event devoid of meaning due to its directness to the body allowing no intervention of intellectual and semiotic process. But language may involve perceptual meaning as well as verbal or conceptual meaning ascribed to words. This implies that even though devoid of conceptual meaning by means of using grammatically non-articulated sounds,sound poetry cannot but have meaning whose articulation is differently, i.e.,iconically made about the aural features of the sounds. Perceptual meaning is unavoidable because everything we are conscious of is a reduced form, a repeatable pattern that works as a sign. ‘Language of presence’ is then actually impossible, and therefore sound poetry should be seen rather as a fest of diverse perceptual meanings.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. Bernstein, "Introduction Close Listening: Poetry and the Performed Word" (1998), New York: Oxford UP
  2. Eco, Umberto, "A Theory of Semiotics" (1976), Bloomington: Indiana UP
  3. Erickson, Jon, "The Language of Presence: Sound Poetry and Artaud", boundary2, 14, pp.279~290 (1985)
  4. Lyotrad, Jean-Francois, "The tooth, the Palm", Sub-Stance, 15, pp.105~110 (1976)
  5. McCaffery, Steve, "Some Notes Re Sound, Energy, and Performance The Poetry Reading" (1981), San Francisco: Momo’s Press
  6. McCaffery, Steve, "North of Intention" (2000), New York: Roof Books
  7. McCaffery, Steve, "Prior to Meaning" (2001), Evanston: Northwestern UP
  8. Nichols, Bill, "Ideology and the Image" (1981), Bloomington: Indiana UP
  9. Nietzsche, Friedrich, "The Will to Power" (1967), New York: Vintage Books
  10. Perloff, Marjorie, "21st-Century Modernism" (2002), Oxford: Blackwell
  11. Scobie, Stephen, "I Dreamed I Saw Hugo Ball: bpNichol, Dada, and Sound Poetry", boundary 2, 3, pp.213~226 (1974)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)