본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

자유시 ―찰스 번스틴의 경우

Free Verse: in the Case of Charles Bernstein

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The aim of this paper is to understand American language poet, Charles Bernstein’s ‘language poetics’ through Walter Benjamin’s ‘pure language’ and Giorgio Agamben’s ‘inoperativity.’ According to Benjamin, language for communication and information through ‘expression’ and ‘meaning’ of subject’s intention is language constructed by bourgeois concept of language. Benjamin’s ‘pure language’ means communicability freed from ‘intention’ and ‘meaning’ of bourgeois language and ‘expressionless’ language indifferent to expression. Agamben’s ‘pure’ can be attached to what practices ‘inoperativity.’ Agamben’s ‘pure capability’ is capability of incapability which can render its own capability inoperative. Agamben names this capability of its own incapability as ‘sui generis praxis.’ Human subjectivity is the place where this ‘sui generis praxis’ happens. Agamben’s ‘inoperativity’ ‘suspends’ specific and concrete operations and ‘exposes’ possibilities of ‘different’ operations at the same time. Benjamin’s ‘pure language’ is communicability as communication of communication exposed through suspension of specific and concrete communication based on expression and meaning of bourgeois language. Language in Bernstein’s ‘language poetics’ is language freed from bourgeois language and ‘expressionless’ language indifferent to expression and language operated by Agamben’s ‘inoperativity.’ Bernstein’s ‘language poetics’ ‘suspends’ ‘Official Verse Culture’ based on bourgeois language and ‘exposes’ possibilities for ‘different’ ‘foreign’ languages. Bernstein’s ‘language poetics’ halts ‘free verse’ by poet subjects presupposed by ‘Official Verse Culture’ and ‘lyric’ of ‘expression of universal human feeling’ by ‘Official Verse Culture.’ ‘Free verse’ by ‘language poetics’ is ‘free verse’ freed from ‘free verse’ and ‘lyric’ by poetics of ‘Official Verse Culture.’ ‘Free verse’ of ‘language poetics’ where ‘sui generis of language’ happens can be said to be the place where ‘sui generis praxis’ of free verse happen.

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to understand American language poet, Charles Bernstein’s ‘language poetics’ through Walter Benjamin’s ‘pure language’ and Giorgio Agamben’s ‘inoperativity.’ According to Benjamin, language for communication and information through ‘expression’ and ‘meaning’ of subject’s intention is language constructed by bourgeois concept of language. Benjamin’s ‘pure language’ means communicability freed from ‘intention’ and ‘meaning’ of bourgeois language and ‘expressionless’ language indifferent to expression. Agamben’s ‘pure’ can be attached to what practices ‘inoperativity.’ Agamben’s ‘pure capability’ is capability of incapability which can render its own capability inoperative. Agamben names this capability of its own incapability as ‘sui generis praxis.’ Human subjectivity is the place where this ‘sui generis praxis’ happens. Agamben’s ‘inoperativity’ ‘suspends’ specific and concrete operations and ‘exposes’ possibilities of ‘different’ operations at the same time. Benjamin’s ‘pure language’ is communicability as communication of communication exposed through suspension of specific and concrete communication based on expression and meaning of bourgeois language. Language in Bernstein’s ‘language poetics’ is language freed from bourgeois language and ‘expressionless’ language indifferent to expression and language operated by Agamben’s ‘inoperativity.’ Bernstein’s ‘language poetics’ ‘suspends’ ‘Official Verse Culture’ based on bourgeois language and ‘exposes’ possibilities for ‘different’ ‘foreign’ languages. Bernstein’s ‘language poetics’ halts ‘free verse’ by poet subjects presupposed by ‘Official Verse Culture’ and ‘lyric’ of ‘expression of universal human feeling’ by ‘Official Verse Culture.’ ‘Free verse’ by ‘language poetics’ is ‘free verse’ freed from ‘free verse’ and ‘lyric’ by poetics of ‘Official Verse Culture.’ ‘Free verse’ of ‘language poetics’ where ‘sui generis of language’ happens can be said to be the place where ‘sui generis praxis’ of free verse happen.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 구자광, "찰스 번스틴의 (반)시학에 대한 연구", 비평과이론, 21(3), pp.113~150 (2016), 한국비평이론학회
  2. 구자광, "정치적 글쓰기와 치안적 글쓰기: 찰스 번스틴과 D.W. 펜자의 논쟁을 중심으로", 현대영미시연구, 23(2), pp.1~33 (2017), 한국현대영미시학회[DOI]
  3. 구자광, "찰스 번스틴의 ‘윤리적, 미학적, 정치적’ (반)시학에 대한 연구", 비평과이론, 23(3), pp.5~33 (2018), 한국비평이론학회[DOI]
  4. Agamben, Giorgio, "The Fire and the Tale" (2017), Stanford UP
  5. Agamben, Giorgio, "The Kingdom and the Glory: For a Theological Genealogy of Economy and Government" (2011), Stanford UP
  6. Agamben, Giorgio, "Means without End" (2000), University of Minnesota P.
  7. Agamben, Giorgio, "Potentialities" (1999), Stanford UP
  8. Agamben, Giorgio, "State of Exception" (2003), University of Chicago P
  9. Agamben, Giorgio, "Profanations", pp.61~72 (2007), Zone Books
  10. Benjamin, Walter, "Walter Benjamin Selected Writings Vol. 1. 1913-1926", pp.236~252 (2000), Harvard UP
  11. Benjamin, Walter, "Walter Benjamin Selected Writings Vol. 1. 1913-1926", pp.62~74 (2000), Harvard UP
  12. Benjamin, Walter, "Walter Benjamin Selected Writings Vol. 1. 1913-1926", pp.253~263 (2000), Harvard UP
  13. Bernstein, Charles, "A Poetics" (1992), Harvard UP
  14. Bernstein, Charles, "Attack of the Difficult Poems: Essays and Inventions" (2011), UP
  15. Bernstein, Charles, "Content’s Dream: Essays 1975-1984" (2001), Northwestern UP
  16. Bernstein, Charles, "My Way: Speeches and Poems" (1999), UP
  17. Bernstein, Charles, "Pitch of Poetry" (2016), UP
  18. Fenza, D.W., "Advice for Graduating MFA Students in Writing: The Words & the Bees", The Writer’s Chronicle, 32(6), pp.30~35 (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)