정부경쟁력의 국제비교: 구성지표와 평가
A Cross-County Comparison of Government Competitiveness: Measures and Evaluation
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study attempts to measure government competitiveness of OECD countries as an exploratory step for designing internationally comparable index, taking critical view on the existing indices that lack the consideration on the role of government played in managing overall competitiveness of a country. Based on the government competitiveness concept defined in our former study, we collected comprehensive dataset regarding major sectors of government activity, and produced government competitiveness index categorized also into different stages based on systems theory. We found that the overall government competitiveness of Korea is ranked 16th among 34 OECD countries in aggregated score: economic sector (9th), cultural sector (3rd), and ICT sector (10th) ranked higher than ranking of aggregated score while educational sector (20th), Health sector (27th), agricultural sector (28th), and environmental sector (25th) ranked lower than that. In terms of scores in stages of systems theory, government competitiveness of Korea ranked 20th in the throughput stage while ranked 4th in the outcome stage. Korea ranked 12th in the input stage and ranked 17th in the output stage.
Abstract
This study attempts to measure government competitiveness of OECD countries as an exploratory step for designing internationally comparable index, taking critical view on the existing indices that lack the consideration on the role of government played in managing overall competitiveness of a country. Based on the government competitiveness concept defined in our former study, we collected comprehensive dataset regarding major sectors of government activity, and produced government competitiveness index categorized also into different stages based on systems theory. We found that the overall government competitiveness of Korea is ranked 16th among 34 OECD countries in aggregated score: economic sector (9th), cultural sector (3rd), and ICT sector (10th) ranked higher than ranking of aggregated score while educational sector (20th), Health sector (27th), agricultural sector (28th), and environmental sector (25th) ranked lower than that. In terms of scores in stages of systems theory, government competitiveness of Korea ranked 20th in the throughput stage while ranked 4th in the outcome stage. Korea ranked 12th in the input stage and ranked 17th in the output stage.
참고문헌 (32)
- 고길곤, "국가경쟁력지수에 대한 비판적 검토: IMD와 WEF의 국가경쟁력지수를 중심으로", 행정논총, 50(3), pp.35~66 (2012), 한국행정연구소
- 김용직, "현대한국정치와 체계이론 분석: 이론과 적용사례 검토", 한국정치외교사논총, 34(1), pp.113~146 (2012), 한국정치외교사학회[DOI]
- 알프레드 호, "정부경쟁력(Government competitiveness)의 개념정립: 시간과 공간의 관점에서", 행정논총, 50(3), pp.1~34 (2012), 한국행정연구소
- 임도빈, "비교행정강의" (2011), 박영사
- 임도빈, "국제개발행정분야 연구동향에 관한 메타분석: 정부경쟁력 관점에서", 행정논총, 51(2), pp.31~59 (2013), 한국행정연구소
- 최영출, "정부경쟁력이 국가경쟁력에 미치는 인과관계분석", 한국비교정부학보, 11(2), pp.31~48 (2007), 한국비교정부학회
- 최영출, "국가경쟁력지수의 타당성과 신뢰성 분석", 한국사회와 행정연구, 20(3), pp.41~63 (2009), 서울행정학회
- Amsden, Alice., "Asia's Next Giant : South Korea and Late Industrialization", pp.3~23 (1989), Oxford University Press
- Bouckaert, Geert, "Performance Measurement and Management: The Achilles' Heel in Administrative Modernization", Public Performance & Management Review, 25(4), pp.359~362 (1995)
- Dunleavy, Patrick, "Theories of the State : the Politics of Liberal Democracy" (1987), Macmillan Education
- Erickson, Robert S., "American Public Opinion" (2001), Priscilla McGeehon
- Easton, David, "A systems Analysis of Political Life" (1965), Wiley
- Fukuyama, Francis, "What Is Governance?", Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 26(3), pp.347~368 (2013)
- Fukuyama, Francis, "강한 국가의 조건" (2005), 황금가지
- Hall, Peter, "An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism, In Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage", pp.1~68 (2001), Oxford University Press
- Hassett, Wendy L., "Long-Serving City Managers: Practical Application of the Academic Literature", Public Administration Review, 62(5), pp.622~629 (2003)
- Scenes Dynamics in Global Cities: Seoul, Tokyo and Chicago, "Jang, Wonho", Seoul Development Institute, ~ (2011)
- Krugman, Paul, "Is Free Trade Passe?", Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1(2), pp.131~144 (1987)
- Krugman, Paul, "Letters to the Editor", Foreign Affairs, pp.170~177 (1995)
- Krugman, Paul, "The Myth of Asia's Miracle", Foreign Affairs, pp.62~78 (1994)
- La Porta, R., "The Quality of Government", Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 15(1), pp.222~279 (1999)
- Mishler, William, "What Are the Origins of Political Trust? : Testing Institutional and Cultural Theories in Post-communist Societies", Comparative Political Studies, 34, pp.30~ (2001)
- Nester, William, "American Industrial Policy: Free or Managed Markets?", pp.14~56 (1997), St. Martin's Press
- Newton, Kenneth, "Confidence in Public Institutions: Faith, Culture or Performance?", Paper for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association (1999)
- Orren, Gary, "Fall from grace: The public's loss of faith in government" (1997), Harvard University
- Porter, Michael E, "국가 경쟁우위: 글로벌 경쟁력 강화를 위한 경영전략" (2009), 21세기북스
- Rodrik, Dani, "One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth", pp.99~152 (2008), Princeton University Press
- Van Ryzin, Gregg G, "Drivers and Consequences of Citizen Satisfaction: An Application of the American Customer Satisfaction Index Model to New York City", Public Administration Review, 64(3), pp.331~341 (2004)
- Woo-Cumings, Meredith, "Introduction: Chalmers Johnson and the politics of nationalism and development, In The Developmental State" (1999), Cornell University Press
- Wright, Deil S., "Understanding Intergovernmental Relations", pp.1988, Brooks
- Yang, Kaifeng, "The Performance–Trust Link: Implications for Performance Measurement", Public Administration Review, 66(1), pp.114~126 (2006)
- Zaller, John, "The Effects of Political Involvement on Public Attitudes and Voting Behavior", Presents at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association (1986)
