본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Interorganizational Competition and Government Competitiveness:The Case of the Korean Central Government

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류정책학

초록

This study introduces the concept of government competitiveness tothe public management literature. Government competitiveness involves aneffective, value-oriented utilization of resources in order to provide services thatcan lead to economic and social development. It is argued that, overall, governmentcompetitiveness is the outcome of both coordination and cooperation among keyindustries and competition between them, as each strives to secure for itself agreater share of resources and legitimacy. This hypothesis is tested using a novelmeasurement method of government competitiveness that incorporates both asubjective and objective dimension of competitiveness obtained from a nationalsurvey of civil servants as well as performance rankings from the Korean primeminister’s office. In addition to finding that interorganizational competitionenhances overall competitiveness, this study also finds that performance management,goal clarity, and innovative climate all influence government competitiveness.The theoretical and practical implications of this study are discussed indetail.

Abstract

This study introduces the concept of government competitiveness tothe public management literature. Government competitiveness involves aneffective, value-oriented utilization of resources in order to provide services thatcan lead to economic and social development. It is argued that, overall, governmentcompetitiveness is the outcome of both coordination and cooperation among keyindustries and competition between them, as each strives to secure for itself agreater share of resources and legitimacy. This hypothesis is tested using a novelmeasurement method of government competitiveness that incorporates both asubjective and objective dimension of competitiveness obtained from a nationalsurvey of civil servants as well as performance rankings from the Korean primeminister’s office. In addition to finding that interorganizational competitionenhances overall competitiveness, this study also finds that performance management,goal clarity, and innovative climate all influence government competitiveness.The theoretical and practical implications of this study are discussed indetail.

참고문헌 (53)

  1. Ahn, B. M., "Elites and political power in South Korea" (2003), Edward Elgar
  2. Ahn, B. M., "The Korean government" (2008), Dasan Books
  3. Barzelay, M., "Breaking through bureaucracy: A new vision for managing in government" (1992), University of California Press
  4. Balfour, D. L., "Organizational commitment : Antecedents and outcomes in public organizations", Public Productivity and Management Review, 19(3), pp.256~277 (1996)
  5. Battaglio, R. P. Jr., "Reforming public management : Analyzing the impact of public service reform on organizational and managerial trust", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(4), pp.689~707 (2009)
  6. Brewer, G. A., "Whistle blowers in the federal civil service: New evidence of the public service ethic", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(3), pp.413~439 (1998)
  7. Brewer, G. A., "Individual conceptions of public service motivation", Public Administration Review, 60(3), pp.254~264 (2000)
  8. Bruno, I., "The 'indefinite discipline' of competitiveness benchmarking as a neoliberal technology of government", Menerva, 47(3), pp.261~280 (2009)
  9. Chibber, V., "Bureaucratic rationality and the developmental state", American Journal of Sociology, 107(4), pp.951~989 (2002)
  10. Chou, L. F., "Shared work values and team member effectiveness : The mediation of trustfulness and trustworthiness", Human Relations, 61(12), pp.1713~1742 (2008)
  11. Chun, Y. H., "Goal ambiguity and organizational performance in U. S. Federal Agencies", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(4), pp.529~ (2005)
  12. Damanpour, F., "Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations : Assessing the role of managers", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(6), pp.495~522 (2009)
  13. Denhardt, J., "The new public service: Serving, not steering" (2003), M. E. Sharpe
  14. Forbes, M., "How does public management affect government performance? Findings from international research", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(4), pp.559~584 (2005)
  15. Frederickson, H. G., "New public administration" (1980), University of Alabama Press
  16. Frederickson, H. G., "The spirit of public administration" (1996), Jossey-Bass
  17. Fukuyama, F, "What is governance?", Governance, 26(3), pp.347~368 (2013)
  18. Grant, A. M., "Mission possible? The performance of prosocially motivated employees depends on manager trustworthiness", Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), pp.927~944 (2009)
  19. Haque, M. S., "Pride and performance in the public service: Three Asian cases", International Review of Administrative Sciences, 67(1), pp.99~115 (2001)
  20. Heckman, A. C., "Desperately seeking management: Understanding management quality and its impact on government performance outcomes under the Clean Air Act", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(3), pp.473~496 (2012)
  21. Hofstede, G. H., "Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations" (2001), Sage
  22. Im, T. B., "The Korean Government and Public Policies in a Development Nexus", pp.55~75 (2013), Springer
  23. 임도빈, "Korea’s Experiences with Development: Revisiting MDGs from a Time Perspective", The Korean Journal of Policy Studies, 25(3), pp.125~145 (2010), 서울대학교행정대학원
  24. Janssen, O., "Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour", Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), pp.287~302 (2000)
  25. Johnston, J., "The new public management in Australia", Administrative Theory and Praxis, 22(2), pp.345~368 (2000)
  26. Jung, C. S., "Organizational goal characteristics and public duty motivation in U.S. federal agencies", Review of Public Personnel Administration, 31(1), pp.28~47 (2011)
  27. Kim, S. M., "Individual-level factors and organizational performance in government organizations", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(2), pp.245~261 (2004)
  28. 고길곤, "The Evolution of Infrastructure Investment of Korea", The Korean Journal of Policy Studies, 29(1), pp.123~145 (2014), 서울대학교행정대학원
  29. Krugman, P., "Competitiveness: A dangerous obsession", Foreign Affairs, 73(2), pp.28~44 (1994)
  30. Lindblom, C. E., "Inquiry and change: The troubled attempt to understand and shape society" (1990), Yale University Press
  31. Meier, J. K., "Subjective organizational performance and measurement error: Common source bias and spurious relationships", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory (2012)[DOI]
  32. Mael, F., "Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), pp.103~123 (1992)
  33. Naff, K. C., "Working for America: Does public service motivation make a difference?", Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19(4), pp.5~16 (1999)
  34. National Performance Management Advisory Commission, "A performance management framework for national and local governments", ~ (2010)
  35. Niskanen, W. A. Jr., "Bureaucracy and public economics" (1994), Edward Elgar
  36. Painter, M., "Tradition and public administration" (2010), Palgrave Macmillan
  37. Park, S., "How and what you pay matters: The relative effectiveness of merit pay, bonuses, and long-term incentives on future job performance", Compensation and Benefits Review, 44(2), pp.80~85 (2012)
  38. Perry, J. L., "Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity", Journal of public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), pp.5~22 (1996)
  39. Perry, J. L., "Federal merit pay, round II : An analysis of the performance management and recognition system", Public Administration Review, 49(1), pp.29~37 (1989)
  40. Podsakoff, P. M., "Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it", Annual Review of Psychology, 63, pp.539~569 (2012)
  41. Podsakoff, P. M., "Common method biases in behavioral research : A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies", Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), pp.879~903 (2003)
  42. Podsakoff, P. M., "Self-Reports in organizational research : Problems and prospects", Journal of Management, 12(4), pp.531~544 (1986)
  43. Porter, M. E., "The competitive advantage of nations" (1998), Macmillan
  44. Rainey, H. G., "Understanding and managing public organizations" (1997), Jossey-Bass
  45. Ritz, A., "Public service motivation and organizational performance in Swiss federal government", International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(1), pp.53~78 (2009)
  46. Solomon, R. C., "Building trust in business, politics, relationships, and life" (2001), Oxford University Press
  47. Robinson, S. L., "Trust and breach of the psychological contract", Administrative science quarterly, 41(4), pp.574~599 (1996)
  48. Rodrik, D., "Institutions for high-quality growth: What they are and how to acquire them", Studies in Comparative International Development, 35(3), pp.3~31 (2000)
  49. Rousseau, D. M., "International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology" (1988), Wiley
  50. Scott, S. G., "Determinants of innovative behavior : A path model of individual innovation in the workplace", Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), pp.580~607 (1994)
  51. Subramanian, A., "Organizational innovativeness : Exploring the relationship between organizational determinants of innovation, types of innovations, and measures of organizational performance", Omega, 26(6), pp.631~647 (1996)
  52. Thau, S., "The relationship between trust, attachment, and antisocial work behaviors", Human Relations, 60(8), pp.1155~1179 (2007)
  53. Wright, B. E., "The role of work context in work motivation : A public sector application of goal and social cognitive theories", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(1), pp.59~78 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)