본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Comparative Study of the Energy Policy Making of South Korea and Germany: with focused to Hermeneutic Methodology

김연수|Michael Mayer
한국비교정부학회 (The Korean Association For Comparative Government)|2013.05|한국비교정부학보 (Korean Comparative Government Review)|제17권 제1호|pp. 95-124|DOI 10.18397/kcgr.2013.17.1.95

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

CommunicationReflection성찰Interest상호주관성UnderstandingInter-subjectivityHermeneutical Methodology이해 및 관심의사소통. 해석적 접근
주제분류행정학

초록

Korea and Germany had pursued similar unclear policies until the accident so Fukushima and Chernobyl. However Chernobyl accident made German civil societies raise questions upon the nuclear policies and the misfortune in Fukushima played a catalyst that brought changes in the process of decision making of unclear policies. Unlike Germany, the nuclear policies of South Korea have kept moving on the same old track, which invariably comes to cause social conflict. This study intends to propose the necessity of a methodological alternative incase the social conflict continues. Based on hermeneutics and methodology, this study analyzed the differences of Korea and Germany in the decision-making process of nuclear policies from political, economic, social, environmental and renewable energy-related perspective. The findings of the comparative study reveals that although South Korea understood, had interest in and went through the process of reflection on the policies from social and environmental perspective, respectively, it didn’t do from political, economical, and renewable energy-related perspective. On the other hand, Germany showed insufficient reflection in economic dimension, but well-considered reflection and communication in other dimensions. It was also found that the appropriate consideration of Germany led to social and environmental consensus in energy policy making. Even German people actively invested particularly in renewable energy sector.

Abstract

Korea and Germany had pursued similar unclear policies until the accident so Fukushima and Chernobyl. However Chernobyl accident made German civil societies raise questions upon the nuclear policies and the misfortune in Fukushima played a catalyst that brought changes in the process of decision making of unclear policies. Unlike Germany, the nuclear policies of South Korea have kept moving on the same old track, which invariably comes to cause social conflict. This study intends to propose the necessity of a methodological alternative incase the social conflict continues. Based on hermeneutics and methodology, this study analyzed the differences of Korea and Germany in the decision-making process of nuclear policies from political, economic, social, environmental and renewable energy-related perspective. The findings of the comparative study reveals that although South Korea understood, had interest in and went through the process of reflection on the policies from social and environmental perspective, respectively, it didn’t do from political, economical, and renewable energy-related perspective. On the other hand, Germany showed insufficient reflection in economic dimension, but well-considered reflection and communication in other dimensions. It was also found that the appropriate consideration of Germany led to social and environmental consensus in energy policy making. Even German people actively invested particularly in renewable energy sector.

참고문헌 (83)

  1. Choe Young Chul, "Discussion of Research on the Methodology of the Study of Public Administration: Phenomenology and Empiricism", Land Administration Society, 3, pp.107~157 (1990)
  2. Choi Seo Il, "Social Science Research Methodology" (1991), Freeman and Company
  3. Choi Seong Lak, "Relevant to the Flow Model of the Policy Research at the Kingdom of Study: Domestic Case Studies", Journal of the Korean Association for Public Administration Winter Conference (2010)
  4. Eon Jong Seop., "Administrative Philosophy" (2001), Daeyeoung Publishing Co.
  5. Gang Cheol Su, "Topics in Hermeneutics" (2011), Gyeongmunsa
  6. Im Jae Jin, "Interpretation of Hegel Once Chancellor Subjectivity and Inter-subjectivity", Centered Research Philosophy, 48(1), pp.81~98 (1997)
  7. Im Seong Jin, "Ranging from Nuclear Power Development in the Relationship between Rows of Transition: Germany's Nuclear Policy", Political Science, 9(2), pp.27~49 (2001)
  8. Im Ui Young, "Appear Confrontational Methodology Criticized the Phenomenological Methodology of Scientific Methodology and Dysentery Is: the Dictatorship of Reason", Public Administration Review, 29(4), pp.1133~1151 (1995)
  9. Jeon Jong Seop, "Public Administration Initiative and Problem-Solving" (1991), Facet Publishing
  10. Jin, Sang - Hyeon, "A Comparative Study of Nuclear Policy in Korea and Germany", Korean Public Administration, 20(3), pp.73~90 (2012)
  11. 진상현, "신재생에너지 보급정책의 지역별·에너지원별 성과분석", 한국지역개발학회지, 23(1), pp.15~32 (2011), 한국지역개발학회
  12. Jung Dae Sung, "Habermas' Philosophy on the Concept of Inter-subjectivity, Meaning", Hermeneutic Research, 17, pp.131~148 (2001)
  13. Kim Jong Dal, "Environmental Policy", A Critical Study of the Nuclear Power Policy, 12(1), pp.121~135 (2004)
  14. Kim Jong Sul, "Hermeneutics and Political Ideology: Political Thought, Methodology", Public Administration, 26(4), pp.103~120 (1992)
  15. Kim Mi Jung, "A Study on the Aspects of Subject Formation through Inter-subjectivity", 석사, pp.2007
  16. Kim Mun Jo, "Habermas's Communicative Behavior, In Social Criticism" (1990), Nanam
  17. 김선명, "공공부문 혁신의 접근방법에 관한 인식론적 비평: 현상학적 접근방법을 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 39(4), pp.1~18 (2005), 한국행정학회
  18. Kim Yeon Soo, "Research on the Improvement of Energy Supply Policy Direction", 석사, pp.1994
  19. Kim Yun Ok, "Inter-subjectivity based on Educational Research Discourse", 박사, pp.2007
  20. Kim, Hye Jung, "Fukushima Trends Since World Nuclear Korea's Nuclear Policy", Planning-Korean Social Issues, ~ (2011)
  21. Lee Gi Ju, "For the Formulation of Administrative Philosophy Phenomenology and Critical Theory", Social Science Research, 6(2), pp.69~104 (1989)
  22. Lee Gi Ju, "Of the Organization Reification Public Have Never Phenomenology", Social Science Research, 16(2), pp.71~90 (1999)
  23. Lee Sung Ro, "Dilemma of Korea's Nuclear Power Policy and Participatory Democracy", Public Administration, 15(2), pp.125~144 (1981)
  24. Park Jin Hee, "Germany Enucleation of the Historical Evolution and Policy Implications", History Criticism, 98, pp.214~247 (2012)
  25. So young Jin, "Navigating the Possibility of Phenomenological Method in Public Administration", Public Administration Review, 38(4), pp.383~400 (2004)
  26. Song Ha Jung, "Nuclear Policy Regime and Discuss Structures", Korea Policy Institute Planning Seminar, pp.6~7 (2007)
  27. Alfred Schutz, "The Structures of Life World. Volume II" (1959), Northwestern University Press Evanston
  28. Bleicher, "Contemporary Hermeneutics & The Hermeneutic Imagination" (1982), RKP
  29. Chris Lawn, "The Gadamer Dictionary", Typist by Fakenham Prepresss Solutions Ltd. Printed and bound in India, ~ (2001)
  30. Die Zeit, "So Grün Wie Wir", ~ (2010)
  31. David Carr, "The Crisis of European Sciences and TranscendentalPhenomenology, In An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy" (1970), Northwestern University Press
  32. Denhart, Robert B, "Public Administration and the Domination", Administration and society, 11(1), pp.107~120 (1979)
  33. Dieter Stein, "Subjectivity and Subjectivisation. Linguistic Perspectives" (1995), Cambridge University Press
  34. Ethikkommission, "Deutschlands Energiewende- Ein Gemeinschaftswerk für dieZukunft", ~ (2011)
  35. Farmer, David J, "The Language of the Public Administration" (1999), Bakyoungsa
  36. Financial Times, "Zehntausswnde protestieren gegan Atompolitik", ~ (2010)
  37. Frank Schalow, "Heidegger, Translation, and the Task of Thinking, In Essays in Honor of Parvis Emad" (2011), Spinger
  38. Gardamer, "Truth and Method" (1975), Continuum
  39. Gardamer, Hans-G, "Hans-G, “Without Poets There Is No Philosophy’ : interview with Hans-Georg Gadamer’, with Cristiane Gehron and Jonathan Rée", Radical philosophy, 69 (1995)
  40. Gardamer, H-G, "Century of Philosophy : Hans Georg Gadamer in Conversation with Riccardo Dottori" (2004), Continuum
  41. Gardamer, H-G, "H-G, Gadamer in Conversation: Reflections and Commentary" (2001), Yale University Press
  42. Habermas, "Discours and Democracy. Essays on Habermas’s Between Facts and Norms" (2002)
  43. Habermas, "Theory of Communicative Action" (1981)
  44. Habermas, "Between Facts and Norms" (1992)
  45. Habermas, "The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity" (1985)
  46. Hans-Georg Gadamer, "Truth and Method" (1975), Sheed & Ward
  47. Harmon, Michael M., "Administrative Philosophy-act Theory" (1995)
  48. Hillengaß, C., "Atom Kraft und Protest. Die politische Wirkung der Anti AKW-Bewegung in Deutschland, Frankreich und Schweden" (2011), Oekom
  49. Husserl, E., "The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology" (1970), Northwestern University Press
  50. 한형서, "A Study on Corruption of Public Administration: Lessons from Germany", 한국비교정부학보, 16(3), pp.19~38 (2012), 한국비교정부학회
  51. Inglehar, Ronald E., "Postindustrial Politics : How Bening Will it Be?", Comparative Politics, 6, pp.163~192 (1977)
  52. Jason Paul Bourgeois, "The Aesthetic Hermeneutics of Hans – Georg Gadamer and Hans Urs von Balthasar" (2007), Peter Lang Publishing, inc.
  53. 남지원, "Fukushima Nuclear Accident: Cyber Communities' Voices in East Asia", 한국비교정부학보, 16(3), pp.1~17 (2012), 한국비교정부학회
  54. Kingdon, John W., "Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies" (1995), Harper Collins College Publishers
  55. Kirkhart, Larry, "Toward a Theory of Pubic Administration, In Toward a New Public Administration" (1991), Chandler Publishing
  56. Öko Institute, "Energiewende 2020: Der Weg in eine zukunftsfähige Energiewirtschaf" (2000)
  57. Osborne, Grant R., "The Humeneutical Spiral : A Comprehensive Introduction to Biblical Interpretation" (1991), Intervarsity Press
  58. Rijk, Peer de, "Neclear Energy in the New Century : the Being of the End", Asia Forum of Nati-neclear Power, 9(14), pp.51~70 (2001)
  59. Roose, J., "Der endlose Streit um die Atomenergie. Konfliktsoziologische Untersuchung einer dauerhafhen Auseinandersetzung, In Umwelt – und Technikkonflikte" (2010), VS Verlag
  60. Rene von Schomberg, "Discourse and Democracy. Essays on Harvermas’s Between Facts and Norms" (2002), State University of New Work Press
  61. Rüdig, W., "Phasing Out Nuclear Energy in Germany", German Politics, 9(3), pp.43~80 (2000)
  62. Scott William G., "Administrative Crisis: The Neglect of Metaphisical Speculation", Public Administration Review, 19(10), pp.580~586 (1973)
  63. Walter L. Wallace, "The Logic of Science in Sociology" (1927), Cicargo. Press
  64. William Outhwaite, "New Philosophy of Social Science" (1995), HANUL Academy
  65. William Outhwaite, "Habermas A Critical Introduction" (2009), Polity
  66. "4, March, 2013, Kyunghyang Daily", ~ (2013)
  67. "27, January, 2012, Kyunghyang Daily", ~ (2012)
  68. "6, March, 2012, Kyunghyang Daily", ~ (2012)
  69. "7, 2012, March, Kyunghyang Daily", ~ (2012)
  70. "13, July, 2012, The Chosun Daily", ~ (2012)
  71. "16, July, 2012, The Chosun Daily", ~ (2012)
  72. "23, July, 2012, The Chosun Daily", ~ (2012)
  73. "25, July, 2012, The Chosun Daily", ~ (2012)
  74. "29, March, 2011, Weather Bureau", ~ (2011)
  75. "21, March, 2011, Weather Bureau", ~ (2011)
  76. "8. September, 2001, Dong-A Daily", ~ (2001)
  77. "Sequarely. U. S. er al. 2011", ~ (2011)
  78. "4. March, 2011, R.P. Online", ~ (2011)
  79. "7. September, 2010, Berliner Zeitung", ~ (2010)
  80. "Sequarely. U. S. er al. 2011", ~ (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

일본과 독일의 탈원전 정책 비교‒후쿠시마 원전 사고 이후를 중심으로‒박성하한국일본근대학회 · 일본근대학연구2018 · 제59호Study on the policy literacy of the Republic of Korea regarding nuclear and new-renewable energy김주경, 우승민, 임은옥한국원자력학회 · Nuclear Engineering and Technology2022 · 제54권 제2호에너지 정책 네트워크에서 정책행위자 간 관계구조와 상호작용 분석 독일과 한국의 시민참여 사례분석을 통한 함의 찾기김서용, 노유경, 박지민, 이시현, 임진영, 전세혁(사)위기관리이론과실천 · Crisisonomy2024 · 제20권 제12호Nuclear Energy Policy Swing: Expansion and Contraction in South Korea이태동, 스티븐 모건미래정치연구소 · 미래정치연구2024 · 제14권 제2호원자력에너지의 미래와 국가 정책결정구조: 미국과 프랑스 사례가 한국에 주는 함의고경민, 이성우분쟁해결연구센터 · 분쟁해결연구2014 · 제12권 제3호지속가능한 발전을 위한 독일 에너지 정책김현정, 정해조한국유럽학회 · 유럽연구2015 · 제33권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

개발도상국 국가혁신체제의 평가에 관한 비교연구: 메콩권역 5개국을 중심으로박상욱pp. 1-22Legitimating Irreconcilable Views on Campaign Financing: Is Paying $200,000 to a Fellow Candidate a Bribe or Money-for-favor남지원pp. 23-42사회적 기업의 성공요인 연구: FSQCA(퍼지집합 질적비교 방법)의 적용최영출pp. 43-60중국의 과학기술예산 시스템 분석과 시사점 도출이상엽, 이기종, 김남이pp. 61-94The Relationships among Communication Competence, Empowerment and Organizational Commitment of Nurses in a General Hospital박민향, 이지민pp. 125-148
원문 보기