본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

에너지 정책 네트워크에서 정책행위자 간 관계구조와 상호작용 분석 독일과 한국의 시민참여 사례분석을 통한 함의 찾기

Analyzing the Structure of Relationships and Interactions among Policy Actors in Energy Policy Networks - Finding Implications from a Case Study of Citizen Participation in Germany and South Korea -

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

본 연구의 목적은 시민참여의 역할을 독일과 한국 에너지 정책사례를 중심으로 비교분석하고 정책적 함의를 도출하는 데 있다. 이를 위해 시민사회 논의에 근거하여 정책네트워크 모형을 연구의 분석 틀로 설정하였다. 특히 독일과 한국의 시민참여와 제도적 맥락을 배경으로 여섯 개의 사례에 대한 분석에서 정책행위자간 관계구조, 상호작용을 이해하고 이에 근거한 시사점을 도출하였다. 각 사례의 분석 결과, 첫째, 정책 네트워크에서 시민참여가 정책에 대한 수용성을 높이는 것으로 나타났다. 이를 위해서 공식적, 비공식적 행위자들의 기능적 역할이 중요하였다. 둘째, 정책 네트워크의 성공을 위해서는 상호작용측면에서 볼 때 협력적 상호작용이 필수적인데 이를 위해서는 공식적 행위자와 비공식적 행위자간 경계를 넘어서는 소통 노력과 소통을 위한 다양한 수단이 필요하다. 셋째, 정책 네트워크 구조는 개방형, 폐쇄형, 분산형 등 다양한 유형이 존재하는데 이들 유형들은 공존하면서 보완적 역할을 수행한다. 본 연구의 여섯 개의 사례 분석을 통해 정책네트워크 관계구조와 상호작용의 다양성이 가지는 기능을 경험적으로 확인하였으며, 정책적인 시사점을 도출할 수 있었다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze the role of citizen participation in energy policy cases in Germany and Korea and to derive policy implications. Against the backdrop of citizen participation and institutional contexts in Germany and Korea, the relationship structure and interactions between policy actors were analyzed through a policy network model. The results of the analysis show that, first, citizen participation in policy networks increases the acceptance of policies. For this, the functional roles of formal and informal actors were important. Second, cooperative interaction is essential for the success of policy networks, and communication efforts and various means are necessary between formal and informal actors. Third, there are various types of policy network structures, such as open, closed, and distributed, and these types coexist and play complementary roles. Through the analysis of six cases in this study, the functions of the relationship structure and diversity of interactions in policy networks were empirically confirmed and policy implications were derived.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. Byun, Jong-RiP, "A Study on Policy Networks in Climate Change Response Policy", Energy Economics Research, 9(1), pp.151~180 (2010)
  2. Choi, Seungkook, "A Study on the Governance Process of Energy Transition Policy", NGO Studies, 16(3), pp.219~257 (2021)
  3. Huh, Taewook, "Socio-Technology Transition and Environment and Energy Governance of Seoul : The Case of 'One Less Nuclear Power Plant'", NGO Studies, 13(1), pp.27~68 (2018)
  4. Jung, Dagyum, "Exploring New Governance in Response to a Risk Society: An Analysis of the Effects of Values, Perceptions, Communication, and Resource Factors on Trust in Fine Dust Rumours", Journal of Public Administration, 58(1), pp.1~36 (2020)
  5. Jung, Yeon-mi, "Paradigm Shift in German Energy Policy", Kyungsang Journal of Economics, 34(4), pp.209~232 (2016)[DOI]
  6. Kim, Geun Sik, "The Political Economy of Extended Operation of Nuclear Power Plants: Focusing on the Economic and Political Perceptions of Residents in Areas Surrounding Nuclear Power Plants", Local Administration Research, 9(4), pp.295~336 (2015)
  7. Kim, Geun Sik, "Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Multidimensional Benefit Perception on Nuclear Energy Acceptance", Journal of Public Administration, 55(4), pp.207~245 (2017)
  8. Kim, Kang Min, "Exploring the Applicability of Policy Networks in Public Conflict Research", Social Science Studies, 35(2), pp.51~80 (2009)
  9. Kim, YoungPyoung, "Energy Security and the Future of Nuclear Power", Korean Policy Studies Association Seminar, 2007(1), pp.1~43 (2007)
  10. Ko, Myeong Chul, "The Impact of Government Trust and Political Efficacy on Citizen Participation: Focusing on the Moderating Effect of Public Service Experience", Korean Public Management Journal, 34(4), pp.99~122 (2020)
  11. Lee, Byung Ryang, "A Study on the Politicisation of Local Bureaucracy", Journal of Public Administration, 57(4), pp.1~30 (2019)
  12. Park, Ie Rei, "Responding to a Risk Society and Exploring New Governance : An Analysis of the Role of Risk Communication Factors in Determining Actions to Respond to Fine Dust", Journal of Policy Analysis and Evaluation, 30(1), pp.107~138 (2020)
  13. Park, Jin Hee, "A New Philosophy of Citizen Participation and Renewable Energy Policy: Based on Germany's Energy Transition Policy", Environmental Philosophy, 16, pp.159~188 (2013)
  14. Rhodes, R. A. W., "The New Governance: Governing without Government", Political Studies, 44(4), pp.652~667 (1996)
  15. Seo, Hyuk Jun, "Analysis of Factors in the Establishment of Local Energy Governance", Local Administration Research, 28(4), pp.283~312 (2014)
  16. Seol, Min, "Is Experience Important? : Analysis of the Effects of Experience on Residents of Nuclear Power Plant Areas", Korean Journal of Public Administration, 49(4), pp.151~179 (2015)
  17. Sung, Wook Joon, "A Study on the Legislation Process of Media Representatives", Ph. D, pp.2013
  18. Yoo, Jae-Won, "Expanding Citizen Participation", Korean Policy Science Review, 7(2), pp.105~125 (2003)
  19. Yoo, Yeon Jae, "Value, Experience, Perception-An Exploratory Study on the Suitability of a Multi-layer Model Based on Value and Experience in Nuclear Acceptance", Crisisonomy, 11(8), pp.179~201 (2015)
  20. "e-나라지표「에너지원별 발전량 현황」"[URL]
  21. "EU "원전은 친환경"... 전제조건은 ′방폐장′" (2022)[URL]
  22. "독일 원전 ‘역사 속으로’... 탈원전 시대 시작" (2023)[URL]
  23. "국내 원전 12기 밀집 된 경북…불안감 확산" (2016)[URL]
  24. "고준위방사성폐기물부지선정법", 독일연방법무부[URL]
  25. "고준위방폐물 특별법 제정 또는 불발…후세에 짐 넘기나" (2023)[URL]
  26. "참여를 통한 갈등 해결, 에너지공동설계프로그램(K-ESTEEM)" (2023)[URL]
  27. "「제2차 고준위 방사성폐기물 관리 기본계획」세계핵폐기물보고서 2019 유럽 특집", 산업통상부[URL]
  28. ""빨리보다 안전하게"…프랑스 고준위 방폐장 건설 "국민·정부·국회 협조"" (2023)[URL]
  29. "독일편 ②" (2023), 에너지정책소통센터[URL]
  30. "Gesetz Zur Suche und Auswahl eines Standortes Für Ein Endlager Für Hochradioaktive Abfälle" (2023)[URL]
  31. "Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz" (2023)[URL]
  32. "Task. BGE-the Federal Company for Radioactive Waste Disposal" (2023)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)