디지털기술을 활용한 OECD 정부혁신 사례 비교와 차세대 재정정보화에 대한 시사점
OECD Government Innovation Using Digital Technology and Implications for Next Generation Fiscal Informatization
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
(Purpose) It is necessary to understand how government innovation is led by digital technologies. The government is no exception from the ripple effects of the 4th Industrial Revolution. This article analyzes best OECD government innovation cases using digital technologies to solve a problem in new ways and draws implications for the information service innovation strategy promoted by the Korean government. (Design/methodology/approach) Drawing on a range of data from OECD countries’ government reports and websites, this study analyzes five best practices regarding awareness of cases, relevance to South Korea’s government innovation, and applicability of comparative analysis framework. The comparison categories are an overview of the case, recognizing the problem, how each case changes things, how they use new digital technology, innovators, and methods. (Findings) The study finds some interesting points from the comparison, five selected cases of government innovation: 1. A dedicated team of about a dozen people internally spearheaded the innovation within a government organization. 2. Among the best examples of OECD government innovation, it was hard to find a dramatic success in service innovation using artificial intelligence. 3. Agile methods are preferred for project management in an environment where teams and processes work poorly established. 4. To improve the convenience of work processes and public services in the fiscal information system, various digital technology needs to and introduced into links with financial institutions and other public institutions. (Research implications or Originality) This article may provide implications for future discussions on government innovation using 4th Industrial Revolution technology. This research provides theoretical and practical help to policy sites such as next-generation fiscal system projects.
Abstract
(Purpose) It is necessary to understand how government innovation is led by digital technologies. The government is no exception from the ripple effects of the 4th Industrial Revolution. This article analyzes best OECD government innovation cases using digital technologies to solve a problem in new ways and draws implications for the information service innovation strategy promoted by the Korean government. (Design/methodology/approach) Drawing on a range of data from OECD countries’ government reports and websites, this study analyzes five best practices regarding awareness of cases, relevance to South Korea’s government innovation, and applicability of comparative analysis framework. The comparison categories are an overview of the case, recognizing the problem, how each case changes things, how they use new digital technology, innovators, and methods. (Findings) The study finds some interesting points from the comparison, five selected cases of government innovation: 1. A dedicated team of about a dozen people internally spearheaded the innovation within a government organization. 2. Among the best examples of OECD government innovation, it was hard to find a dramatic success in service innovation using artificial intelligence. 3. Agile methods are preferred for project management in an environment where teams and processes work poorly established. 4. To improve the convenience of work processes and public services in the fiscal information system, various digital technology needs to and introduced into links with financial institutions and other public institutions. (Research implications or Originality) This article may provide implications for future discussions on government innovation using 4th Industrial Revolution technology. This research provides theoretical and practical help to policy sites such as next-generation fiscal system projects.
참고문헌 (18)
- 안준모, "인공지능을 통한 행정의 고도화 : 기회와 도전", 한국행정연구, 30(2), pp.1~33 (2021), 한국행정연구원[DOI]
- Drescher, Daniel, "Blockchain Basic" (2017), Gildan Media
- Farma Trust Progress Report, "Farmatrust", ~ (2018)
- Presenting gender pay gap figures to the public : Online randomized controlled trial, "Government Equalities Office", ~ (2018)
- Analysis of the effect and relationship of the introduction of technologies related to the 4th industrial revolution, "Kim, Sang Hoon", Korea Institute for Industrial Economics &Trade’s, ~ (2020)
- Mariana Mazzucato, "Financing innovation: creative destruction vs. destructive creation", Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(4), pp.851~867 (2013)
- M.Jae, Moon, "Futher Government Innovation Cases" (2019), Munwosa
- 2021 Comprehensive Government Innovation Promotion Plan, "MIS", Ministry of Interior and Safety of the Republic of Korea, ~ (2021)
- "Applying Behavioural Insights in EdTech" (2020)[URL]
- Better Rules for Government Discovery Report, "NZ government", ~ (2018)
- Embracing Government Innovation, "OECD", OECD Paris, ~ (2019)
- Embracing Government Innovation, "OECD", OECD Paris, ~ (2018)
- Pandey, P., "Securing E-health Networks from Counterfeit Medicine Penetration Using Blockchain", Wireless Pers Commun, 117, pp.7~25 (2021)[DOI]
- Park, Wu Jin, "A platform to support local government's innovative technology reception, verification, and corrective use : Focusing on the case of the new technology reception desk at the Seoul Institute of Technology", Korean Society of Technology Innovation 2019 Autumn Conference Papers, pp.1305~1320 (2019)
- Pencheva, I., "Big Data and AI-A transformational shift for government: So, what nest for research?", Public Policy and Administration, 35(1), pp.24~44 (2020)
- 신신애, "공공정보화사업의 신기술 적용현황과 정보자원관리 전략", 정보화연구, 15(1), pp.1~16 (2018), 한국엔터프라이즈아키텍처학회[DOI]
- "Why Blockchain Is the First Aid for Pharma, Posted by Darya Yafimava" (2019)[URL]
- Research Project on Administrative Service Innovation Plans Using Information Technology in the 4th Industrial Revolution Era, "Yoon, Gwang Suk", Korea Institute of Public Administration, 6112~6537, pp.Research Project 2018(0) (2018)