청소년서비스 전달 조직성과 인식에서 자율과 책무의 역할 : 경기도 출연기관과 서울시 민간위탁기관 비교
Role of Autonomy and Accountability for the Perceived Performance of Youth Service Delivery Organizations: A Comparison between Gyeonggi Province Government Agencies and Private Commissioned Agencies in Seoul
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
(Purpose) This study aims to examine the differences in organizational autonomy and accountability and their impact on individual perceptions of organizational effectiveness in the provision of public services for youth policy. Additionally, it investigates how public service motivation varies across these organizations. (Design/methodology/approach) This study conducted a survey and got data from 319 employees. To test the research hypotheses, path coefficients were presented by regression. (Findings) The analysis reveals that regardless of the operational mode in youth service provision, "financial autonomy" is found to contribute to organizational performance in the autonomy aspect, while "professional accountability" plays a crucial role in the accountability aspect. In the case of delegation-based agencies, "political accountability" is identified as an additional important factor, whereas in the case of private outsourcing, the role of "strategic autonomy" in organizational performance is highlighted. (Research implications or Originality) (Research implications or Originality) Through this study, it has been demonstrated that the existential nature of the delivering entity in local public services (i.e., whether it is performed directly by the government or outsourced) exhibits some differences in terms of organizational management characteristics of autonomy and accountability.
Abstract
(Purpose) This study aims to examine the differences in organizational autonomy and accountability and their impact on individual perceptions of organizational effectiveness in the provision of public services for youth policy. Additionally, it investigates how public service motivation varies across these organizations. (Design/methodology/approach) This study conducted a survey and got data from 319 employees. To test the research hypotheses, path coefficients were presented by regression. (Findings) The analysis reveals that regardless of the operational mode in youth service provision, "financial autonomy" is found to contribute to organizational performance in the autonomy aspect, while "professional accountability" plays a crucial role in the accountability aspect. In the case of delegation-based agencies, "political accountability" is identified as an additional important factor, whereas in the case of private outsourcing, the role of "strategic autonomy" in organizational performance is highlighted. (Research implications or Originality) (Research implications or Originality) Through this study, it has been demonstrated that the existential nature of the delivering entity in local public services (i.e., whether it is performed directly by the government or outsourced) exhibits some differences in terms of organizational management characteristics of autonomy and accountability.
참고문헌 (14)
- Brewer, G. A., "Whistle Blowers in The Federal Civil Service: New Evidence of The Public Service Ethic", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(3), pp.413~440 (1998)
- Ha, J, "An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Management Autonomy on Performance in Public Enterprises", Master, pp.2010
- 황광선, "공공 조직의 자율과 책무: 책임운영기관과 일반행정기관의 차이 분석", 한국공공관리학보, 31(1), pp.259~284 (2017), 한국공공관리학회[DOI]
- Hwang, K., "The Meaning and Three Perspectives of "Autonomy and Accountability" in the Public Sector", Presented at the 2018 Summer Conference of the Korean Association for Public Administration (2018)
- 황광선, "책무성(Accountability)과 성과(Performance)의 호혜성과 차별성에 대한 이론적･실증적 고찰", 정부학연구, 22(2), pp.169~194 (2016), 정부학연구소[DOI]
- Ji, M., "An Analysis of the Impact of Management Autonomy on Organizational Performance in Quasi-Governmental Organizations", Master, pp.2015
- Kim, K. J., "A Study on Determining Effective Operation Methods for Youth Training Centers", Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 15(2), pp.281~304 (2004)
- Kim, S. M., "Individual-Level Factors and Organizational Performance in Government Organizations", Journal of Public Administration and Research and Theory, 15(2), pp.245~261 (2005)
- Pollitt, C., "Agencies: How governments do things through semi-autonomous organizations. Houndmills" (2004), Palgrave Macmillan
- Romzek. Barbara S., "Accountability in the Public Sector: Lessons from the Challenger Tragedy", Public Administration Review, 47(3), pp.227~238 (1987)
- van Thiel, S., "Unbundled Government", pp.167~183 (2004), Routledge
- Verhoest K, "The Study of Organisational Autonomy: A Conceptual Overview", Public Administration and Development, 24(2), pp.101~118 (2004)
- Voorn, "Business techniques as an explanation of the autonomy-performance link in corporatized entities:evidence from Dutch Municipally owned corporations", International Public Management Journal, 25(5), pp.660~676 (2020)
- Weiss, D. J., "Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire", Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation, 22, pp.120~ (1967)