개정형사소송법 제196조에 대한 해석과 과제
The Amendment of article 196 of Criminal Procedure Law and its Problem
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The criminal procedure law, legislated in 1954, defined the prosecution as the main body of investigation and supervisors of the police. Therefore, in Korea, there has been long-running debate between the police and the prosecution over the matter of investigation rights. Recently, in June 2011, the National Assembly passed the bill adjusting the authority of investigation rights in criminal cases by amendment of article 196 of Criminal Procedure Law. The points of the reform is to stipulate investigative rights of police expressly in the law, and to enact the rights of supervision of the prosecution by a presidential decree. The purpose of this article is to examine the meaning of amendment of article 196 of Criminal Procedure Law, and to explore the problem included in the reform act. For this purpose, the contents of this article is as follows. The first chapter is introduction. The second chapter describes the progress of amendment of reform act. The third chapter describes meaning of the new article 196 of Criminal Procedure Law. At the fourth chapter, I arranged the points of problem of reform act and presidential decree. And added to this, at the last chapter, personal opinion about relationship of the police and the prosecution is presented as a conclusion.
Abstract
The criminal procedure law, legislated in 1954, defined the prosecution as the main body of investigation and supervisors of the police. Therefore, in Korea, there has been long-running debate between the police and the prosecution over the matter of investigation rights. Recently, in June 2011, the National Assembly passed the bill adjusting the authority of investigation rights in criminal cases by amendment of article 196 of Criminal Procedure Law. The points of the reform is to stipulate investigative rights of police expressly in the law, and to enact the rights of supervision of the prosecution by a presidential decree. The purpose of this article is to examine the meaning of amendment of article 196 of Criminal Procedure Law, and to explore the problem included in the reform act. For this purpose, the contents of this article is as follows. The first chapter is introduction. The second chapter describes the progress of amendment of reform act. The third chapter describes meaning of the new article 196 of Criminal Procedure Law. At the fourth chapter, I arranged the points of problem of reform act and presidential decree. And added to this, at the last chapter, personal opinion about relationship of the police and the prosecution is presented as a conclusion.
참고문헌 (13)
- 신동운, "수사지휘권의 귀속에 관한 연혁적 고찰(Ⅰ)․(Ⅱ)", 서울대학교법학, 42(1) (2001)
- 신동운, "형사소송법제정자료집" (1990), 형사정책연구원
- 문준영, "한국 검찰제도의 역사적 형성에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2004
- 경찰청, "수사구조개혁백서 형사사법 선진화를 위한 정책방향", 경찰청, ~ (2010)
- 이동희, "경미범죄의 효율적 처리방안- 일본의 경미범죄 처리제도의 비교법적 시사점을 중심으로", 형사정책, 15(2), pp.6~384 (2003), 한국형사정책학회
- 千野啓太郞, "警察搜査と事件送致", 警察學論集, 51(10) (1998)
- 김태명, "일본의 미죄처분과 간이송치 제도", 한국경찰법학회 학술대회 (2011), 한국경찰법학회
- 열린우리당, "검․경수사권조정정책기획단", 조정안, ~ (2005)
- 김희철, "김희철 의원 대표발의 형사소송법 일부개정법률안", ~ (2009)
- 문학진, "문학진 의원 대표발의 형사소송법 일부개정법률안", ~ (2010)
- "일본의 사법경찰집무규범 및 범죄수사규범", ~
- "국회회의록 자료"[URL]
- "각종 언론보도", ~ (2011)
