본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

혐오범죄의 형사법적 규율에 관한 제언 - 미국의 혐오범죄예방법(Hate Crimes Prevention Act) 및 혐오범죄통계법(Hate Crime Statistics Act)을 중심으로

Legislative Discussion for prevention of Hate Crime - in focus on <Hate Crimes Prevention Act> & <Hate Crime Statistics Act> in USA

0

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Since in USA have been passed in 1969 <the Hate Crime Prevention Act (HCPA)> and in 1990 <the Hate Crime Statistics Act (HCSA)>, has been collected and reported the data of the Hate Crime. ‛The Hate Crime Statistics Program(HCSP)' of the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting(UCR) Program collects data regarding criminal offenses that are motivated, in whole or in part, by the offender's bias against a race, religion, sexual orientation, ehnicity/national origin. or disability and are committed against persons, property, or society. Because motivation is subjective, it is sometimes difficult to know with certainty whether a crime resulted from the offender's bias. The presence of bias alone does not necessarily mean that a crime can be considered a Hate Crime. Only when law enforcement investigation reveals sufficient evidence to lead a reasonable and prudent person to conclude that the offender's actions were motivated, in whole or in part, by his or her bias, should an incident be reported as a hate crime. For the prevention of Hate Crime should be discussion on enactment of new panelties in korea.

Abstract

Since in USA have been passed in 1969 <the Hate Crime Prevention Act (HCPA)> and in 1990 <the Hate Crime Statistics Act (HCSA)>, has been collected and reported the data of the Hate Crime. ‛The Hate Crime Statistics Program(HCSP)' of the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting(UCR) Program collects data regarding criminal offenses that are motivated, in whole or in part, by the offender's bias against a race, religion, sexual orientation, ehnicity/national origin. or disability and are committed against persons, property, or society. Because motivation is subjective, it is sometimes difficult to know with certainty whether a crime resulted from the offender's bias. The presence of bias alone does not necessarily mean that a crime can be considered a Hate Crime. Only when law enforcement investigation reveals sufficient evidence to lead a reasonable and prudent person to conclude that the offender's actions were motivated, in whole or in part, by his or her bias, should an incident be reported as a hate crime. For the prevention of Hate Crime should be discussion on enactment of new panelties in korea.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. 경찰청, "세계의 혐오범죄단체 현황", 경찰청, ~ (2008)
  2. 국가인권위원회, "사회권 포럼 자료집 1", 국가인권위원회, ~ (2007)
  3. 국가인권위원회, "성적 소수자 인권 기초현황조사 자료", 국가인권위원회, ~ (2011)
  4. 김수원, "사회적 차별, 혐오범죄(Hate Crime) 그리고 인권", 원광법학, 25(3), pp.261~296 (2009), 법학연구소
  5. 김진혁, "한국형 증오범죄에 관한 연구", 한국범죄심리연구, 6(1), pp.31~57 (2010), 한국범죄심리학회
  6. 박찬운, "차별금지법 제정의 의미와「차별금지법안」의 주요내용", 국가인권위원회「차별금지법안」공청회자료집, ~ (2008)
  7. 노회찬의원 대표발의 차별금지법안 검토보고서, "노회찬", 법제사법위원회, ~ (2008)
  8. 최응렬, "미국에서의 인종차별에 의한 증오범죄에 관한 연구", 피해자학연구, 13(2), pp.361~394 (2005), 한국피해자학회
  9. "Uniform Crime Report ‘Hate Crime Statistics’", U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation, ~ (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)