본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Die Entwicklungen und Aufgaben auf zwei Jahrzente Homiletik

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기독교신학

초록

In 21st century, both the Catholic church and Protestant church have traditionally maintained separate homiletics in Germany. Specially, the Catholic church has pointed out liturgy-centered church, but Protestant church has aimed to build up word-centered church. Therfore, the homiletics tradition of both Churches have resulted in their own patterns of worship contents. In today, the Catholic church has been interested in interpreting the liturgy by preaching(Words) and, Protestant church has regarded the preaching as first sign of baptism sacrament. However, both the Catholic church and Protestant church have separate views related to the meaning of preaching and of piety for church ritual. In other words, although Catholic's preaching only explained the liturgy in itself, since Second Vatican Council, each country interpreted replaced the liturgy with linguistic view of preaching as the own cultural expression. However, it disappeared from preaching-centered liturgy and conventional and systematic views in Protestant church. On the contrary, it has expanded the theological preaching which stresses on Justification of believers. Basically, both Churches have had their own separate exegetic and liturgical points of view. Recently, their homiletics have come even closer together owing to the study involved in both the exegesis for preaching and the illumination of the Holy Spirit in linguistic aspects of bible texts. In spite of different homiletic questions on the preaching language, both of them emphasized the importance of preacher’s preaching delivery and of layer’s preaching comprehension. From ancient time, although people have paid attention to preaching rhetorical role, and the both Catholic church and Protestant church was interested in the preacher’s rhetorical role, it was difficult for their homiletic coincidence because preaching style of Catholic priest was different from that of Protestant’s pastor. It is going on the homiletics study of Peter Düsterfeld which mentions the preaching and the understanding of the Catholic church. In addition, as H. R. Müller-Schwefe criticizes Mildenberger und Dannowski’s theological study and reflects on the homiletics of both churches, they suggest new homiletics. It is to study the homiletics through language delivery, rhetorical development, and textual interpretations of the Bible.

Abstract

In 21st century, both the Catholic church and Protestant church have traditionally maintained separate homiletics in Germany. Specially, the Catholic church has pointed out liturgy-centered church, but Protestant church has aimed to build up word-centered church. Therfore, the homiletics tradition of both Churches have resulted in their own patterns of worship contents. In today, the Catholic church has been interested in interpreting the liturgy by preaching(Words) and, Protestant church has regarded the preaching as first sign of baptism sacrament. However, both the Catholic church and Protestant church have separate views related to the meaning of preaching and of piety for church ritual. In other words, although Catholic's preaching only explained the liturgy in itself, since Second Vatican Council, each country interpreted replaced the liturgy with linguistic view of preaching as the own cultural expression. However, it disappeared from preaching-centered liturgy and conventional and systematic views in Protestant church. On the contrary, it has expanded the theological preaching which stresses on Justification of believers. Basically, both Churches have had their own separate exegetic and liturgical points of view. Recently, their homiletics have come even closer together owing to the study involved in both the exegesis for preaching and the illumination of the Holy Spirit in linguistic aspects of bible texts. In spite of different homiletic questions on the preaching language, both of them emphasized the importance of preacher’s preaching delivery and of layer’s preaching comprehension. From ancient time, although people have paid attention to preaching rhetorical role, and the both Catholic church and Protestant church was interested in the preacher’s rhetorical role, it was difficult for their homiletic coincidence because preaching style of Catholic priest was different from that of Protestant’s pastor. It is going on the homiletics study of Peter Düsterfeld which mentions the preaching and the understanding of the Catholic church. In addition, as H. R. Müller-Schwefe criticizes Mildenberger und Dannowski’s theological study and reflects on the homiletics of both churches, they suggest new homiletics. It is to study the homiletics through language delivery, rhetorical development, and textual interpretations of the Bible.

참고문헌 (58)

  1. Albrecht, H, "Predigen" (1985), W. Kohlhammer
  2. Barth, K, "Homiletik" (1985), Theologischer Verlag
  3. Bartholomäus, W, "Kleine Predigtlehre" (1974), Benzinger Verlag
  4. Bayer, O, "Promissio" (1971), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
  5. Beutel, A. usw, "Homileisches Lesebuch: Texte zur heutigen Predigtlehre" (1986), Katzmann
  6. Bohren, R., "Die Differenz zwischen Meinen und Sagen", PTh(Pastoral Theologie, 9, pp.429~ (1981)
  7. Bohren, R, "Predigtlehre" (1980), Chr. Kaiser Verlag
  8. 최진봉, "A Study of “Sensus Communis” for Homiletic Persuasion - Dialogue with Giambattista Vico, Stanley Fish, and Sandra M. Schneiders -", 신학과 실천, (37), pp.269~295 (2013), 한국실천신학회
  9. 정연락, "Interpretation of the Scriptures in the Sermons of the Early Church - From the Perspective of the Jewish Synagogue Sermons -", 신학과 실천, (37), pp.185~215 (2013), 한국실천신학회
  10. Dahm, K. W, "Beruf Pfarrer" (1971), Chr. Kaiser Verlag
  11. Daiber, K. F., "Predigen und Hören" (1980), Chr. Kaiser Verlag
  12. Dannowski, H. W, "Kompendium der Predigtlehre" (1985), Gütersloher Verlaghaus
  13. Denecke, A, "Persönliche predigen" (1979), Gütersloher Verlaghaus
  14. Denzinger, H., "Enchiridion Symbolorum" (1965), Verlag Herder KG
  15. Doerne, M. Art., "Die Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart=RGG", pp.440~ (1986), J. C. B. Mohr
  16. Dreher, B., "Ein homiletisches Werkbuch" (1968), Kohlhammer
  17. Düsterfeld, P, "Predigt und Kompetenz" (1978), Patmos Verlag
  18. Ebeling, G., "Das Wesen des christlichen Glaubens" (1959), J. C. B. Mohr
  19. Ebeling, G, "Theologie und Verkündigung" (1963), J. C. B. Mohr
  20. Fuchs, O, "Die lebendige Predigt" (1978), Kaiser Verlag
  21. Haendler, O, "Die Predigt" (1960), Verlag Alfred Töpelmann
  22. Haensli, E., "Sacramentum mundi. Theologisches Lexikon für die Praxis(SThLP)" (1968), Verlag Herder
  23. Hirsch, E, "Predigerfibel" (1964), Walter De Gruyter
  24. Hirscher, H, "Konkret predigen, Anleitung und Beispiele für die Praxis" (1977), Gütersloher Verlaghaus
  25. Hummel, G, "Aufgabe der Predigt" (1971), Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft
  26. Ioannis Pauli PP. II, "Codex luris Canonici: Codex des kanonischen Rechts" (1984), Verlag Butzon & Bercker
  27. 전창희, "Gerhard Ebeling’s Hermeneutical Influence on the New Homiletic", 신학과 실천, (33), pp.67~93 (2012), 한국실천신학회
  28. Jungmann, Jos. A, "Wortgottesdienst im Lichte von Theologie und Geschichte" (1965), S. Rederer Verlag
  29. Kamphaus, Fr., "Handbuch der Verkündigung" (1970), Verlag Herder
  30. 김영학, "Seelsorge zwischen Verkündigung und Therapie - Ein seelsorgerlicher Umgang mit E. Thurneysen -", 신학과 실천, (21), pp.225~245 (2009), 한국실천신학회
  31. Krusche, P., "Preidtstudien Beiheft", pp.430~441 (1968), Kreuz Verlag
  32. Lange, E., "Predigen als Beruf" (1982), Kaiser Verlag
  33. Lange, E., "Preidtstudien Beiheft 1", pp.9~10 (1968), Kreuz Verlag
  34. 류원렬, "A Critical Analysis and Vision of Korean Preaching", 신학과 실천, (25), pp.143~168 (2010), 한국실천신학회
  35. Luther, M., "WA=Martin Luthers Werke, Bd.6. Sämtliche vergriffenen Bämde der Luther-Kritische Gesamtausgabe, Weimarer Ausgabe" (1888), Hermann Böhlau
  36. Martimort, A. G., "Handbuch der Ligurgiewissenschaft" (1963), Herder
  37. Müller, H. M, "Homiletik" (1996), de Gruyter
  38. Müller, H. M., "Charisma und Institution", pp.439~451 (1985), Gütersloher Verlagshaus G. M
  39. Müller, H. M., "Theologische Realenzyklopädie= TRE 15", pp.526~565 (1986), Walter de Gruyter
  40. Müller-Schwefe, H. R., "Möglichkeiten geistlicher Rede in unserer Zeit" (1961), Furche Verlag
  41. Möller, Chr, "Seelsorgliche predigen" (1983), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
  42. Mildenberger, F, "Kleine Predigtlehre" (1984), W. Kohlhammer Verlag
  43. Nembach, U, "Predigt des Evangeliums" (1972), Neukirchener Verlag
  44. Niebergall, Fr., "Wie predigen wir dem mordernen Menschen?", pp.1905~1921, J. C. B. Mohr
  45. Niebergall, A., "Leiturgia II", pp.182~352 (1955), Johannes Stauda Verlag
  46. Otto, G., "Mit einem Beitrag von Ottmar Fuchs" (1981), Gütersloher Verlaghaus
  47. Pius ⅩⅡ., "der Enzyklika "Divino afflante spiritu"", pp.246~ (1943), Vgl
  48. Piper, H. Chr, "Kommunizieren lernen in Seelsorge und Predigt" (1981), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
  49. Piper, H. Chr, "Predigtanalysen" (1976), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
  50. Rahner, K., "Kleines Konzilskompendium" (1980), Verlag Herderbücherei
  51. Schmalkaldische Artikel, "BSLK=Die Bekenntnisschriften der evangelisch-lutherischen Kirc", pp.449~ (1986), Verlag Gerd Mohn
  52. Schüepp, Guido, "Handbuch der Predigt" (1982), Benzinger Verlag
  53. Schurr, V., "Bilanz der Theologie im 20. Jahrhundert. Bd. Ⅲ", pp.385~ (1970), Verlag Herder
  54. Schütz, W, "Geschichte der christlichen Predigt" (1972), Walter de Gruyter
  55. Trillhaas, W, "Einführung in die Predigtlehre" (1983), Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft
  56. Trillhaas, W, "Wahrheit und Glaube, FS für Emanuel Hirsch" (1963), V. H. Gerdes
  57. Trillhaas, W, "Einführung in die Predigtlehre" (1983), Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft
  58. Trillhaas, W, "Die Homiletik seit Schleiermacher bis in die Anfänge der dialetischen Theologie in Grundzügen" (1969), Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)