본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Impact of Justice of Layoff on Management Trust, Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment in the Hotel Corporations

0

조회

0

다운로드

31

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

Since financial crisis of IMF resulted in intensive competitiveness and adverse management environment, many hotel industries have responded it with restructuring. Since this restructuring is accompanied by reduction of employees, hence comes the recognition of justice in the procedure of restructuring. When the surviving employees in the restructuring process recognize unfairness in the procedure and practical operations, organization effectiveness can not be maintained due to losing trust of their employers. In this paper I will examine the relationship between validity of restructuring and compensatory programs for layoffs and surviving employees' trust of the employers. Also I will find out the relationship between remaining employees' trust of the employers and their job satisfaction and organization commitment. Through this relationship, we can prepare an alternative to reduce negative effect of restructuring. The hypotheses of this study are proposed as follows: H1: The higher surviving employees' recognition of procedural justice in restructuring process is, the higher their trust with a manager of the company is. H2: The higher surviving employees' recognition of distributive justice in restructuring process is, the higher their trust with a manager of the company is. H3: The higher surviving employees' recognition of procedural justice in restructuring process is, the higher their job satisfaction is. H4: The higher surviving employees' recognition of distributive justice in restructuring process is, the higher their job satisfaction is. H5: The higher surviving employees' recognition of procedural justice in restructuring process is, the higher their organization commitment is. H6: The higher surviving employees' recognition of distributive justice in restructuring process is, the higher their organization commitment is. H7: The higher surviving employees' trust with a manager of the company in restructuring process is, the higher their job satisfaction is. H8: The higher surviving employees' trust with a manager of the company in restructuring process is, the higher their organization commitment is. For the purposes of this study, employees working in luxury hotels located in Seoul were targeted. Self-administered questionnaires were distributed to those who consented with the investigation after explaining the purpose of the survey. A total of 500 questionnaires were distributed and 450 questionnaire were returned to the researcher for analysis. 430 of the returned questionnaires were used for analysis. As for the education for this survey, 250 junior college graduates or under (58.1%), 143 college graduates (33.3%) and 37 graduate school graduates (8.6%). As for the marital status, 315 persons (73.3%) are single and 115 are married (26.7%). As for the monthly income, 49 people (11.48%) are less than 2 million won, 148 (34.4%) are between 2 million and less than 2.5 million won, 153 (35.6%) are between 2.5 million to less than 3 million won, 80 (18.6%) are more than 3 million won. As for the workplace, 293 people (68.1%) work for the F&B department, 73 (17.0%) for rooms department, 41 (9.5%) for operation/ marketing department, 23 (5.3%) for account/ general affair department. As for the period of employment, 85 people (19.8%) are less than 5 years, 150 (34.9%) are between 6 to 9 years, 143 (33.3%) are between 10 to 14 years. and 52 (3.%) are more than 15 years. An exploratory factor analysis was used to survey validity and reliability of calculating tool on perceived values. This study used correlation between individual items and whole items and Cronbach's alpha value of multiple-item scale which is usually used to assess scale and reliability. Reliability of conceptual sub-dimension was assessed by basing on repeated procedure of correlation between individual items and whole items and factor loading. 1. Verification of correlation between validity of restructuring and trust This research showed that procedural and distributive justice of restructuring affects trust positively. The path coefficient between procedural justice of restructuring and trust is 0.719(t=10.135, p=0.000), and thereby the higher procedural justice results in higher trust. The path coefficient between distributive justice of restructuring and trust is 0.160(t=3.291, p=0.001), and thereby the higher distributive justice results in higher trust. Hence H1 and H2 are accepted. 2. Verification of correlation between validity of restructuring and job satisfaction The path coefficient between procedural justice of restructuring and job satisfaction is 0.179(t=2.202, p=0.028), and thereby the higher procedural justice results in higher job satisfaction. The path coefficient between distributive justice of restructuring and job satisfaction is 0.074(t=1.620, p=0.105), and thereby distributive justice of restructuring has no relationship with job satisfaction. Hence H3 is accepted, but H4 is removed. 3. Verification of correlation between validity of restructuring and organization commitment The path coefficient between procedural justice of restructuring and organization commitment is 0.188(t=2.466, p=0.014), and thereby the higher procedural justice results in higher organization commitment. The path coefficient between distributive justice of restructuring and organization commitment is 0.118(t=2.720, p=0.007), and thereby the higher distributive justice results in higher organization commitment. Hence H5 and H6 are accepted. 4. Verification of correlation between trust and job satisfaction The path coefficient between trust and job satisfaction is 0.610(t=6.736, p=0.000), and thereby the correlation has a meaningful result. Since the higher trust of the employer results in higher job satisfaction, H7 is accepted. 5. Verification of correlation between trust and organization commitment The path coefficient between procedural justice of restructuring and job satisfaction is 0.446(t=5.547 p=0.000), and thereby the higher trust of the employer results in higher organization commitment. Hence H8 is accepted. This research aimed to help the employers of hotel industries by analyzing the effects of validity of restructuring on employees' trust, job satisfaction and organization commitment. The research found that employer's validity of restructuring has significant affects on the degree of employee's trust with a manager, thereby reducing the negative effects of restructuring and enhancing organization commitment and job satisfaction. The principal purpose of this research is to confirm the correlation between employees' perceived validity of restructuring and their trust with a manager. Also whether this correlation results in competitive edge of the company is also investigated. It is also pointed out that employees had to participated the procedure of restructuring, sharing the philosophy and reason of restructuring. This participation and furthermore compensatory methods can reduce employees' anxiety of organization operations. Variable of trust appeared to have impact on intermediation effect between perceived variable of validity and job satisfaction, organization commitment, so that increase of trust with a manager plays an crucial role in increasing organization effectiveness. Since this research did not cover whole hotel industries which underwent restructuring, it showed a limit. Unlike previous studies which dealt with validity and trust of superior bosses, this research focussed on employers. Also the organization citizenship which is not considered in this study will be dealt with in the future study.

Abstract

Since financial crisis of IMF resulted in intensive competitiveness and adverse management environment, many hotel industries have responded it with restructuring. Since this restructuring is accompanied by reduction of employees, hence comes the recognition of justice in the procedure of restructuring. When the surviving employees in the restructuring process recognize unfairness in the procedure and practical operations, organization effectiveness can not be maintained due to losing trust of their employers. In this paper I will examine the relationship between validity of restructuring and compensatory programs for layoffs and surviving employees' trust of the employers. Also I will find out the relationship between remaining employees' trust of the employers and their job satisfaction and organization commitment. Through this relationship, we can prepare an alternative to reduce negative effect of restructuring. The hypotheses of this study are proposed as follows: H1: The higher surviving employees' recognition of procedural justice in restructuring process is, the higher their trust with a manager of the company is. H2: The higher surviving employees' recognition of distributive justice in restructuring process is, the higher their trust with a manager of the company is. H3: The higher surviving employees' recognition of procedural justice in restructuring process is, the higher their job satisfaction is. H4: The higher surviving employees' recognition of distributive justice in restructuring process is, the higher their job satisfaction is. H5: The higher surviving employees' recognition of procedural justice in restructuring process is, the higher their organization commitment is. H6: The higher surviving employees' recognition of distributive justice in restructuring process is, the higher their organization commitment is. H7: The higher surviving employees' trust with a manager of the company in restructuring process is, the higher their job satisfaction is. H8: The higher surviving employees' trust with a manager of the company in restructuring process is, the higher their organization commitment is. For the purposes of this study, employees working in luxury hotels located in Seoul were targeted. Self-administered questionnaires were distributed to those who consented with the investigation after explaining the purpose of the survey. A total of 500 questionnaires were distributed and 450 questionnaire were returned to the researcher for analysis. 430 of the returned questionnaires were used for analysis. As for the education for this survey, 250 junior college graduates or under (58.1%), 143 college graduates (33.3%) and 37 graduate school graduates (8.6%). As for the marital status, 315 persons (73.3%) are single and 115 are married (26.7%). As for the monthly income, 49 people (11.48%) are less than 2 million won, 148 (34.4%) are between 2 million and less than 2.5 million won, 153 (35.6%) are between 2.5 million to less than 3 million won, 80 (18.6%) are more than 3 million won. As for the workplace, 293 people (68.1%) work for the F&B department, 73 (17.0%) for rooms department, 41 (9.5%) for operation/ marketing department, 23 (5.3%) for account/ general affair department. As for the period of employment, 85 people (19.8%) are less than 5 years, 150 (34.9%) are between 6 to 9 years, 143 (33.3%) are between 10 to 14 years. and 52 (3.%) are more than 15 years. An exploratory factor analysis was used to survey validity and reliability of calculating tool on perceived values. This study used correlation between individual items and whole items and Cronbach's alpha value of multiple-item scale which is usually used to assess scale and reliability. Reliability of conceptual sub-dimension was assessed by basing on repeated procedure of correlation between individual items and whole items and factor loading. 1. Verification of correlation between validity of restructuring and trust This research showed that procedural and distributive justice of restructuring affects trust positively. The path coefficient between procedural justice of restructuring and trust is 0.719(t=10.135, p=0.000), and thereby the higher procedural justice results in higher trust. The path coefficient between distributive justice of restructuring and trust is 0.160(t=3.291, p=0.001), and thereby the higher distributive justice results in higher trust. Hence H1 and H2 are accepted. 2. Verification of correlation between validity of restructuring and job satisfaction The path coefficient between procedural justice of restructuring and job satisfaction is 0.179(t=2.202, p=0.028), and thereby the higher procedural justice results in higher job satisfaction. The path coefficient between distributive justice of restructuring and job satisfaction is 0.074(t=1.620, p=0.105), and thereby distributive justice of restructuring has no relationship with job satisfaction. Hence H3 is accepted, but H4 is removed. 3. Verification of correlation between validity of restructuring and organization commitment The path coefficient between procedural justice of restructuring and organization commitment is 0.188(t=2.466, p=0.014), and thereby the higher procedural justice results in higher organization commitment. The path coefficient between distributive justice of restructuring and organization commitment is 0.118(t=2.720, p=0.007), and thereby the higher distributive justice results in higher organization commitment. Hence H5 and H6 are accepted. 4. Verification of correlation between trust and job satisfaction The path coefficient between trust and job satisfaction is 0.610(t=6.736, p=0.000), and thereby the correlation has a meaningful result. Since the higher trust of the employer results in higher job satisfaction, H7 is accepted. 5. Verification of correlation between trust and organization commitment The path coefficient between procedural justice of restructuring and job satisfaction is 0.446(t=5.547 p=0.000), and thereby the higher trust of the employer results in higher organization commitment. Hence H8 is accepted. This research aimed to help the employers of hotel industries by analyzing the effects of validity of restructuring on employees' trust, job satisfaction and organization commitment. The research found that employer's validity of restructuring has significant affects on the degree of employee's trust with a manager, thereby reducing the negative effects of restructuring and enhancing organization commitment and job satisfaction. The principal purpose of this research is to confirm the correlation between employees' perceived validity of restructuring and their trust with a manager. Also whether this correlation results in competitive edge of the company is also investigated. It is also pointed out that employees had to participated the procedure of restructuring, sharing the philosophy and reason of restructuring. This participation and furthermore compensatory methods can reduce employees' anxiety of organization operations. Variable of trust appeared to have impact on intermediation effect between perceived variable of validity and job satisfaction, organization commitment, so that increase of trust with a manager plays an crucial role in increasing organization effectiveness. Since this research did not cover whole hotel industries which underwent restructuring, it showed a limit. Unlike previous studies which dealt with validity and trust of superior bosses, this research focussed on employers. Also the organization citizenship which is not considered in this study will be dealt with in the future study.

참고문헌 (52)

  1. 김경훈, "기업의 구조조정과 마케팅성과에 관한 모형연구", 마케팅과학연구, 5, pp.1~19 (2000)
  2. 김계숙, "AMOS 구조방정식 모형분석" (2001), SPSS 아카데미
  3. 권영욱, "호텔기업의 구조조정이 직무스트레스 요인과 직무성과에 미치는 영향", 석사, pp.2002
  4. 노용진, "고용조정방식이 생존자 조직몰입에 미치는 영향", 조직과 인사관리연구, 27(3) (2003), 한국인사관리학회
  5. 이용기, "레스토랑 종업원의 서비스지향성 재정의 및 영향요인 T.G.I. Fridays를 중심으로", 마케팅과학연구, 5, pp.43~56 (2000)
  6. 정시영, "잔류종업원의 해고관련 공정성지각과 직무불안정성이 직무만족,조직몰입,조직시민행동에 미치는 영향", 석사, pp.2004
  7. 최익봉, "리더의 임파워먼트 행위,조직공정성,신뢰와 조직유효성 간의 관련성에 관한 연구 신뢰의 매개적 역할을 중심으로", 박사, pp.2004
  8. Adams,J.S., "Inequity in social exchange. In : Advances in Experimental Socual Psychology" (1963), academic Press
  9. Adams,J.S., "Toward an understanding of inequality", Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, pp.422~436 (1963)
  10. Alexander,S., "The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behaviors", Social Justice Research, 1, pp.177~197 (1987)
  11. Babara,A.M., "Trust in Modern Societies" (1996), Cambridge, Polity Press
  12. Bayfield, A. H., "An index of job satisfaction", Journal of Applied Psychology, 35, pp.307~311 (1951)
  13. Blake, R. B., "Solving Costly Organization Conflict" (1984), San francisco Jossey-Bass Publisher
  14. Blau,P.M., "The dynamic of bureaucracy : a study of interpersonal relations in two government, agencies" (1964), Chicago, Ⅱ, University of Chicago Press
  15. Brockner,J., "The impact to layoffs on survivors : an organizational justice perspective. In : Applied Social Psychology and Organizational Setting", pp.49~75 (1990), Hillsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  16. Brockner,J., "Interactive effects of procedural justice and outcome negativity on victims and survivor of job loss", The Academy of Management Journal, 37(2), pp.397~409 (1994)
  17. Brockner, J., "Understanding the interaction between procedural and distributive justice : the role of trust. In :", pp.391~413 (1995), Trust in Organizations Frontiers of Theory and Research
  18. Brockner,J., "The effect of work layoffs on survivor", Research in organizational Behavior, 10, pp.213~255 (1988)
  19. Brockner,J., "Managing the effects of layoffs on survivors", California Management Review, 34(2), pp.213~255 (1992)
  20. Brockner, J., "Survivors' reactions to layoff: we get by with a little help for our friends", Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4), pp.526~541 (1987)
  21. Brockner, J., "Decision frame, procedural justice, and survivor' reaction to job layoffs", Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(1), pp.59~68 (1995)
  22. Brockner, J., "Interactive effect of job content and context on the reactions of layoff survivors", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(2), pp.187~197 (1993)
  23. Buchanan,B., "organizational commitment: the socialization of managers in work organization", Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, pp.534~545 (1974)
  24. Butler, J. K. Jr, "A behavioral decision theory approach to modelling dyadic trust in superior and subordinates", Psychological Reports, 56, pp.19~28 (1984)
  25. Butler,J.K.Jr, "Towards understanding and measuring conditions of trust : evolution of a conditions of trust inventory", Journal of Management, 17(3), pp.643~663 (1991)
  26. Cameron,K.S., "Strategies for successful organizational downsizing", Human Resource Management, 33(2), pp.189~211 (1994)
  27. Cook,J., "New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need fulfillment", Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53(1), pp.39~52 (1980)
  28. Daniel, P. S., "The party perception of a layoff: procedural derogation and retributive aspects of justice", Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(1), pp.119~127 (1998)
  29. Dean, B. M., "Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes", Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), pp.626~637 (1992)
  30. Dittrich, J. E., "Organizational equity perceptions, employee job satisfaction, and departmental absence and turnover rates, organizational", Behavior and Human Performance, 24, pp.29~40 (1979)
  31. Driscoll,J.W., "Trust and participation in organizational decision making as predictors of satisfaction", Academy of Management Journal, 21, pp.44~56 (1978)
  32. Farmer, S. J., "Becoming an undercover police officer : a note on fairness perceptions, behavior, and attitudes", Journal Organizational Behavior, 24(4), pp.373~387 (2003)
  33. Folger, R., "Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions", Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), pp.115~130 (1989)
  34. Greenberg, J., "A taxonomy of organizational justice theories", The Academy of Management Review, 12(1), pp.9~12 (1987)
  35. Hackman,J.R., "Motivation through the design of work", Human Performance, 16, pp.250~279 (1976)
  36. Kimeyer,S.L., "Social support: it relationship to observed communication with peers and supervisor", Academy of Management Journal, 30, pp.138~151 (1987)
  37. Konovsky, M. A., "Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance", Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5), pp.698~707 (1991)
  38. Konovsky,M.A., "Citizenship behavior and exchange", Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), pp.656~669 (1994)
  39. 이용기, "Investigating the Effects of Relationship Quality on Organizational Commitment and Prosocial Behavior in Hotel Food & Beverage Division†", Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science(마케팅과학연구), 17(3), pp.109~132 (2007), 한국마케팅과학회
  40. Lind, E. A., "The social psychology of procedural justice" (1988), Plenum Press
  41. Liou,T.K., "Understanding employee commitment, in the public organization : a study of the juvenile detention center", International Journal of Public Administration, 18(8), pp.1269~1295 (1995)
  42. Lissak,R.I., "Beyond fairness: The Criterion Problem in Research on Dispute Intervention", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13(1), pp.45~65 (1983)
  43. Locke,E.A., "The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In : Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology" (1976), Rand McNally
  44. Mayer, R. C., "An integrative model of organizational trust", Academy of Management Review, 20(3), pp.709~734 (1995)
  45. McFarlin, D. R., "Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes", Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), pp.626~637 (1992)
  46. Meyer, "A three component conceptualization of organizational commitment", Human Resource Management Review, 1, pp.61~89 (1991)
  47. Miceli, M. P., "Predictors and outcomes of relations to pay-forperformance plans", Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(4), pp.508~521 (1991)
  48. Mowday, R. T., "The measurement of organizational commitment", Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, pp.224~247 (1979)
  49. Mowday, R. T., "Employee-organization linkages: the psychology of commitment absenteeism, and turn-over" (1982), Academic Press
  50. Porter, L. W., "Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians", Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, pp.603~609 (1974)
  51. Singer,M.S., "Procedural justice in managerial selection, identification of fairness determinants and associations of fairness perceptions", Social Justice Research, 5(1), pp.49~70 (1992)
  52. Sweeney, P. D., "Workers' evaluations of the end and means: an examination of four models of distributive and procedural justice organization, genetic", Social and General Psychology Monographs, 126(2), pp.241~260 (1993)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)