본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Political Economy of North Korea’s WMD Venture and Its Strategic Implications

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류정치외교학

초록

This paper discusses the nexus between North Korea’s power configuration, economic conditions, and its WMD development. The isolated Stalinist country could dodge the economic difficulties it experienced since the 1990s with its consolidated one-man dictatorship. However, the regime’s inflexibility has retarded its economic transformation despite the severe economic plight during the mid-1900s. Transition to a market economy could put the hierarchical ruling system in danger of experiencing a serious regime crisis. The dilemma of having to choose between maintaining internal stability and guaranteeing the regime security has driven the North Korean leadership to design a risky strategy of missile and nuclear development. That was the only choice it could take for getting international attentions. International sanctions have proven to be insufficient to penalize the maverick country that dared the missiles and nuclear tests in 2006 and in 2009. The success of a tit-for-tat game is highly dependent upon the astute consistency of rewarding and punishing, and the policy coordination among the stakeholder countries. This is hardly possible in the case of the North Korea nuclear issue because of the limits in monitoring ability and of the lack of effective leverage to enforce it. Six-Party talks, therefore, cannot bear any fruits. In the future, nothing would guarantee the viability of North Korea so overridden with structural contradictions.

Abstract

This paper discusses the nexus between North Korea’s power configuration, economic conditions, and its WMD development. The isolated Stalinist country could dodge the economic difficulties it experienced since the 1990s with its consolidated one-man dictatorship. However, the regime’s inflexibility has retarded its economic transformation despite the severe economic plight during the mid-1900s. Transition to a market economy could put the hierarchical ruling system in danger of experiencing a serious regime crisis. The dilemma of having to choose between maintaining internal stability and guaranteeing the regime security has driven the North Korean leadership to design a risky strategy of missile and nuclear development. That was the only choice it could take for getting international attentions. International sanctions have proven to be insufficient to penalize the maverick country that dared the missiles and nuclear tests in 2006 and in 2009. The success of a tit-for-tat game is highly dependent upon the astute consistency of rewarding and punishing, and the policy coordination among the stakeholder countries. This is hardly possible in the case of the North Korea nuclear issue because of the limits in monitoring ability and of the lack of effective leverage to enforce it. Six-Party talks, therefore, cannot bear any fruits. In the future, nothing would guarantee the viability of North Korea so overridden with structural contradictions.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. Axelrod, Robert, "The Evolution of Cooperation" (1984), Basic Books
  2. , Vol. 64 (June 2000), , 2000
  3. (January 15, 2007), , 2007
  4. (January 14, 2007), , 2007
  5. (October 31, 2005), , 2005
  6. (June 16, 2003), , 2003
  7. (July 19, 2002), , 2002
  8. 정상화, "체제유지의 관점에서 본 북한 경제 개혁의 함의 및 평가", 국방연구, 48(2), pp.155~184 (2005), 국가안전보장문제연구소
  9. 정세진, "이행학적 관점에서 본 최근 북한경제 변화 연구", 국제정치논총, 43(1), pp.209~230 (2003), 한국국제정치학회
  10. Chung, Young-Chul, (2004), Sunin Publishers
  11. Hong, Yong-Pyo, "North Korea's First 50 Years and the Opening of the Kim Jong-il Era – Searching for a Viable Policy towards North Korea", Korea and World Affairs, 22(4) (1998)
  12. (July 4, 2002), , 2002
  13. Keohane, Robert O., "Reciprocity in International Relations", International Organization, 40(1) (1986)
  14. Kim, Chang Ha, "The immortal Juche idea" (1984), Foreign Languages Publishing House
  15. 김근식, "김정일 시대 북한의 新발전전략: 실리사회주의를 중심으로", 국제정치논총, 43(4), pp.197~218 (2003), 한국국제정치학회
  16. 김근식, "김정일 시대 북한의 당 ? 정 ? 군 관계 변화 수령제 변화의 함의를 중심으로", 한국정치학회보, 36(2), pp.349~366 (2002), 한국정치학회
  17. Kim, Gwang-Woon, (2003), Sunin Publishers
  18. 김연철, "북한 신경제 전략의 성공 조건: 시장제도 형성과 탈냉전 국제환경", 국가전략, 8(4), pp.5~24 (2002), 세종연구소
  19. Kim, Young-Yoon, "Choigeun Gyungjegwanryun Bubjeo Jongbireur Tonghaeseo Bon Bukhan Byunhwaeui Teukjinggwa Jeonmang. in: Characteristics and Prospect of the Recent North Korea’s Change of Economy-Related Law Reforms", 한국유럽행정학회보, 6 (2006), 한국유럽행정학회
  20. Kim, Young-Yoon, "Bukhaneui Gyungje Donghyang. in: Trends in North Korea’s Economic Reform", A paper presented at the 35th Conference of North Korea Economy Forum (2005)
  21. Ko, Il-Dong, "Bukhaneui JaejongWuigiwa Jaejonganjongeur Wihan Gwaje. in: Budget Crisis of North Korea and Tasks for Budgetary Stabilization", A paper presented at the 35th Conference of North Korea Economy Forum (2005)
  22. Lee, Young-Hoon, "Changes in North Korea’s Economic Policies and Prospects: Centering on Price", Review on Finance and Economy, 220 (2005)
  23. (April 20, 2000), , 2000
  24. "North Korea Newsletter(2000)", ~ (2000)
  25. North Korea Research Center, "Sejong Institute, Chosun Rodongdangeui Oegwuakdanche. in: Satellite Organs of Chosun Workers Party" (2004), Hanwool
  26. Park, Hyoung-Joong, "BoobungaehyukGwa Sijangdoyibhyung Gaehyukeui Goobun: Bukhangwa Soryuneui Bigyoreur Joongsimeuro. in: Distinguishing Partial Reforms and Market-Oriented Reforms: A Comparison of North Korea and Soviet Union", 현대북한연구, 5(2) (2002), 북한대학원대학교
  27. Podkaminer, Leon, "Ten Lessons from a Decade of Transition", The Vienna Institute Monthly Report, 4 (1999)
  28. "The Pyongyang Times (October 28, 2006)", ~ (2006)
  29. (January 1, 2005), , 2005
  30. (January 1, 2007), , 2007
  31. Sigal, Leon, "Bush Administration’s Policy toward North Korea", A paper presented at ‘The Bush Administration’s Policy toward North Korea: Prospects for Inter-Korean Relations Conference’ (2001), The Institute of the Far Eastern Studies, Kyungnam University, School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University, and The Korea Press
  32. (October 4, 2005), , 2005
  33. Ten years of Transmission: Macroeconomic Lessons, "Wyplosz, Charles", The World Bank, ~, pp.Policy Research Working Paper 2288 (2000)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)