유엔⋅미국 등의 대테러자금관련법과 대이란제재
Anti-terrorism financing laws and sanctions against Iran of UN and U.S.
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Recent politics, society. religion, Sharpening ethnic conflicts in accordance with the development of science and technology as weapons of mass destruction and indiscriminate killing many and unspecified persons by the international community as well as causing fear in the social chaos in the country and nation terrorist threats and security risks to themselves and are being discussed. Particularly the risk of terrorism beyond the borders of each state combined with the internationalization of crime, should prepare a detailed response to the dangers of terrorism and international organizations, as well as to cope with major countries including the United States to raise a variety of legislative responses have tried. As part of this effort is the most important anti-terterrorism policies by 2001. 9. 11 terrorist as shown in the images caused large-scale acts of terrorism situation in probation and post-punishment alone effective terrorism measures can not be recognized under the fundamental terrorism itself, the most effective prevention, and to prevent terrorist funds blocked for various international legal and regulatory measures have tried to find laws. This paper details the resolution of international organizations and the United States at the center of sanctions against Iran focused on the legal system examined, focusing on laws of our country in the future by reviewing the legal countermeasures to be deployed in the country's anti-terrorism financing laws, is to offer the application of the basic data. To this end, prior to the recent UN sanctions and other international organizations and U.S. anti-terrorism financing legislation and related regulations against Iran, based on this attitude is examined with respect to sanctions section of the international organizations recently against Iran, the United States, and from 22 December 2008 practiced in Korea , "The law of the prohibition on financing activities for the purpose of intimidating the public" and the related sanctions against Iran review was performed.
Abstract
Recent politics, society. religion, Sharpening ethnic conflicts in accordance with the development of science and technology as weapons of mass destruction and indiscriminate killing many and unspecified persons by the international community as well as causing fear in the social chaos in the country and nation terrorist threats and security risks to themselves and are being discussed. Particularly the risk of terrorism beyond the borders of each state combined with the internationalization of crime, should prepare a detailed response to the dangers of terrorism and international organizations, as well as to cope with major countries including the United States to raise a variety of legislative responses have tried. As part of this effort is the most important anti-terterrorism policies by 2001. 9. 11 terrorist as shown in the images caused large-scale acts of terrorism situation in probation and post-punishment alone effective terrorism measures can not be recognized under the fundamental terrorism itself, the most effective prevention, and to prevent terrorist funds blocked for various international legal and regulatory measures have tried to find laws. This paper details the resolution of international organizations and the United States at the center of sanctions against Iran focused on the legal system examined, focusing on laws of our country in the future by reviewing the legal countermeasures to be deployed in the country's anti-terrorism financing laws, is to offer the application of the basic data. To this end, prior to the recent UN sanctions and other international organizations and U.S. anti-terrorism financing legislation and related regulations against Iran, based on this attitude is examined with respect to sanctions section of the international organizations recently against Iran, the United States, and from 22 December 2008 practiced in Korea , "The law of the prohibition on financing activities for the purpose of intimidating the public" and the related sanctions against Iran review was performed.
참고문헌 (10)
- 권한용, "테러자금조달 억제를 위한 국제법적 논의", 동아법학, (44), pp.383~412 (2009), 법학연구소
- 김석호, "미국 經濟制裁法의 국제적 불법성", 법학연구, (30), pp.387~423 (2008), 한국법학회
- 신의기, "테러리즘 관련법제 정비방안", 27 (2002), 한국형사정책연구원
- 오영근, "형법총론" (2009), 박영사, 서울
- 이진국, "테러자금조달억제를 위한 선진 각국의 정책동향", 형사정책연구, 17(4), pp.5~46 (2006), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이훈동, "각국 대테러 관련법의 제정동향 및 추세", 대테러정책연구논총, (6), pp.92~ (2009)
- 전순신, "국제 테러자금의 조달에 대한 법적 규제", 법조, 55(8), pp.19~55 (2006), 법조협회
- Alan Einisman, "Ineffectiveness at Its Best: Fighting Terroism with Economic Sanction", Minnesota Journal of Global Trade, 9, pp.308~309 (2000)
- Mark D. Beckett, "The American Measures: An Overview of the USA Patriot Act and Its Impact on International Finacial Institutions", CFDC, 9, pp.329~ (2006)
- Ilias Bantekas, "The International Law of Terroist Financing", AJIL, 97, pp.324~ (2003)