즉결심판제도의 운용 실태에 대한 고찰
The Operation Situation and Problem of Summary Conviction System
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Speedy trial are very important values of criminal procedure in terms of finding truth and Due process of law. The constitution guarantees the right to receive the Speedy trial as the fundamental haman rights. Summary judgment actualizes the principle of the Speedy trial. But there is critical opinion that Summary judgment sacrifice other values because of pursuing the Speedy trial. Summary judgment aims at the crime in which an evidence is clear and which the nature of a crime is slight. A prosecutor doesn’t prosecute, and the chief of police station claims a trial to a court directly. The judge of the court can sentence a defendant to the punishment including the fine of under 200,000 wons, detention, or a minor fine. The chief of police station executes the penalty which the judge of the court sentenced. This paper’s purpose solves the practical affairs on trouble which police officers in charge of Summary judgment have experienced. So, I implemented questionnaire study about them, and I arranged and opend that results and analyzed the results of survey and presented substantial solutions. Survey is as follows. The maintenance or abolition of Summary judgment(1), Who should exercise the right of prosecution of Summary judgment(2), Subject of Summary judgment(3 to 5), The abuse of the rignt of prosecution of Summary judgment(6), The absence of the defendant and method of the trial(7 to 10). I wish this paper contributes to the operating system and that the unity of summary conviction.
Abstract
Speedy trial are very important values of criminal procedure in terms of finding truth and Due process of law. The constitution guarantees the right to receive the Speedy trial as the fundamental haman rights. Summary judgment actualizes the principle of the Speedy trial. But there is critical opinion that Summary judgment sacrifice other values because of pursuing the Speedy trial. Summary judgment aims at the crime in which an evidence is clear and which the nature of a crime is slight. A prosecutor doesn’t prosecute, and the chief of police station claims a trial to a court directly. The judge of the court can sentence a defendant to the punishment including the fine of under 200,000 wons, detention, or a minor fine. The chief of police station executes the penalty which the judge of the court sentenced. This paper’s purpose solves the practical affairs on trouble which police officers in charge of Summary judgment have experienced. So, I implemented questionnaire study about them, and I arranged and opend that results and analyzed the results of survey and presented substantial solutions. Survey is as follows. The maintenance or abolition of Summary judgment(1), Who should exercise the right of prosecution of Summary judgment(2), Subject of Summary judgment(3 to 5), The abuse of the rignt of prosecution of Summary judgment(6), The absence of the defendant and method of the trial(7 to 10). I wish this paper contributes to the operating system and that the unity of summary conviction.
참고문헌 (34)
- 신동운, "신형사소송법", 법문사
- 신양균, "형사소송법", 화산미디어
- 이영란, "한국형사소송법", 나남
- 이재상, "형사소송법", 박영사
- "법원실무제요 소년·비송" (2000)
- 田口守一, "刑事訴訟法" (2006), 弘文堂
- 강동욱, "즉결심판제도의 발전적 확대방안", 경찰학연구, 14(1), pp.3~28 (2014), 경찰대학
- 이동희, "경미범죄의 효율적 처리방안 - 일본의 경미범죄 처리제도의 비교법적 시사점을 중심으로-", 형사정책, 15(2), pp.369~384 (2003), 한국형사정책학회
- 김용우, "卽決審判制度에서의 신속성과 절차적 보장문제", 형사정책, 13(1) (2001), 한국형사정책학회
- 김태명, "일본의 미죄처분과 간이송치 제도", 경찰법연구, 9(2), pp.25~55 (2011), 한국경찰법학회
- 김형훈, "卽決事犯處理에 관한 硏究", 교관논문집, (14) (1999), 경찰종합학교
- 김형훈, "즉결심판제도의 바람직한 운용 방향", 치안정책연구, (15) (2001), 치안연구소
- 卽決審判制度에 관한 硏究, "김희옥", 한국형사정책연구원, ~, pp.1992-01 (1993)
- 박상진, "즉결심판제도의 문제점과 입법론적 고찰", 중앙법학, 4(1), pp.1~16 (2002), 중앙법학회
- 백형구, "卽決審判節次의 諸問題 –立法論을 中心으로-", 고시계 (1991)
- 백형구, "즉결심판의 일사부재리의 효력이 미치는 범위", 판례연구, 25(2) (2011), 서울지방변호사회
- 성윤환, "現行 卽決審判制度의 問題點과 改善方案", 중앙법학, 8(3), pp.113~156 (2006), 중앙법학회
- 손동권, "卽決事犯處理節次의 問題點과 改善方案", 형사정책연구, 10(2) (1999)
- 송진경, "경범죄처벌법상 통고처분과 일사부재리의 원칙", 가천법학, 6(2), pp.75~100 (2013), 법학연구소
- 심희기, "경미범죄에 대한 형사정책의 실태와 시민의 반응 – 범측금 통고처분과 즉결심판실무를 중심으로 -", 형사정책연구 (2000)
- 양동철, "통고처분에 따른 범칙금납부의 효력과 일사부재리에 관한 연구", 경희법학, 47(1), pp.223~262 (2012), 법학연구소
- 이병인, "卽決審判과 人權", 법조 (1963), 법조협회
- 이영돈, "즉결심판의 청구 대상에 관한 연구", 경찰학연구, 10(2), pp.21~41 (2010), 경찰대학
- 정진련, "卽決審判節次와 諸問題", 고시계 (2004)
- 최응렬, "즉결심판제도에 관한 고찰", 한국공안행정학회보 (2000), 한국공안행정학회
- 하태훈, "卽決審判節次와 被告人의 人權", 한국법학원보, (85) (2000), 한국법학원
- 한영수, "卽決審判制度에 대한 批判的 考察", 형사정책연구, 9(1) (1998)
- 홍영기, "일사부재리의 효력범위 - 즉결심판을 예로 하여", 저스티스, (123), pp.153~186 (2011), 한국법학원
- 황일호, "즉결심판의 기판력에 대한 판례변경의 필요성", 중앙법학, 9(2), pp.273~292 (2007), 중앙법학회
- 황일호, "즉결심판과 통고처분에 있어서의 일사부재리의 효력", 중앙법학, 12(3), pp.311~342 (2010), 중앙법학회
- 황태정, "즉결심판제도의 문제점과 개선방향" (2003), 한국형사정책연구원
- 경찰청, "경찰통계연보(제57호)", ~ (2013)
- 대검찰청, "2001년~2014년 범죄분석", ~
- 한국형사정책연구원, "범죄와 형사사법 통계정보(CCJS)", ~