환유로 본 소유 표현
A Research on Possessional Expression in View of Metonymy
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Metonymy is a cognitive process in our conceptual structure. Possessional Expression in Idealized Cognitive Model is divided into four types, such as ①'possessum→possessor' schema, ②'part→whole' schema, ③'whole→part' schema, ④'part event→whole event' schema. Types ①,②, and ③ are 'referential metonymy' of space contiguity. Type ④ is 'predicative metonymy' of time contiguity. Those source domain of four types become reference point, and they approach target domain. Schema ①, ②, and ④ are metonymic extensional transfer, which 'part' indicates 'whole'. The schema ③'whole→part' is metonymic reduction transfer, which source and target domain are asymmetric. Next, the continuum of source domain and target domain are as follows: In type ① source domain adjoins target domain spatially. In type ② source domain is included in target domain spatially. In type ③ source domain includes target domain spatially. In type ④ source domain is included in target domain temporally. In case of Possessional Expression, 'part→whole' schema appears more often than 'whole→part' and spatial metonymy appears more extensively than temporal metonymy.
Abstract
Metonymy is a cognitive process in our conceptual structure. Possessional Expression in Idealized Cognitive Model is divided into four types, such as ①'possessum→possessor' schema, ②'part→whole' schema, ③'whole→part' schema, ④'part event→whole event' schema. Types ①,②, and ③ are 'referential metonymy' of space contiguity. Type ④ is 'predicative metonymy' of time contiguity. Those source domain of four types become reference point, and they approach target domain. Schema ①, ②, and ④ are metonymic extensional transfer, which 'part' indicates 'whole'. The schema ③'whole→part' is metonymic reduction transfer, which source and target domain are asymmetric. Next, the continuum of source domain and target domain are as follows: In type ① source domain adjoins target domain spatially. In type ② source domain is included in target domain spatially. In type ③ source domain includes target domain spatially. In type ④ source domain is included in target domain temporally. In case of Possessional Expression, 'part→whole' schema appears more often than 'whole→part' and spatial metonymy appears more extensively than temporal metonymy.
참고문헌 (17)
- 김동환, "인지언어학과 의미", pp.480~484 (2005), 태학사
- 김종도, "인지문법의 디딤돌", pp.121~130 (2002), 박이정
- 김종도, "환유의 세계", pp.164~ (2005), 경진문화사
- 이수련, "한국어 소유 표현 연구", pp.88~ (2006), 박이정
- 이정화, "은유-실용 입문서", pp.266~ (2003), 한국문화사
- 임지룡, "인지의미론", pp.193~201 (1997), 탑출판사
- 정원용, "은유와 환유", pp.154~156 (1999), 신지학원
- 정희자, "담화와 비유어", pp.280~295 (2004), 한국문화사
- Barcelona, A, "Clarifying and Applying the Notions of Metaphor and Metonymy with Cognitive Linguistics: An Update:Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparision and Contrast", pp.207~277 (2002), Mouton de Gruyter
- Dirven.R, "Metonymy and metaphor : Different mental strategies of onceptualisation in:Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparision and Contrast", Mouton de Gruyter, 93, pp.75~112 (2002)
- Fauconnier.G, "Mappings in Thought and Language" (1977), Cambridge University Press
- Feyaerts K, "Refining the Inheritance Hypothesis: Interaction between metaphoric and metonymic hierarchies:Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads", pp.59~78 (2003), Mouton de Gruyter
- Goossens,L, "Metaphtonymy: The Interaction of Metaphor and Metonymy in Expressions for Linguistic Action", Cognitive Linguistics, 1(3), pp.323~340 (1990)
- Lakoff, G, "Metaphor We Live By" (1980), University of Chicago Press
- Lakoff, G, "Woman, Fire and Dangerous things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind" (1994), University of Chicago Press
- Langacker,R, "Reference-point Constructions", Cognitive Linguistics, 4, pp.30~55 (1993)
- Seto,Ken-Ichi, "Distinguishing Metonymy from synecdoche in:Metonymy in Language and Thought" (1999), John Benjamins Publishing Company