본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어 학습자의 쓰기에 나타난 어휘 다양도 및 어휘 밀도 연구

A Study on the Lexical Variation and Lexical Density Shown in Writing of KFL Learners

1

조회

0

다운로드

41

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The purpose of this study is to examine the lexical variation and lexical density shown in writing of KFL learners. In summary, first, the language-specific TTR of NNS subjects was no more than 40% of all. Second, the rate of TTR was as follows: Vietnamese < Japanese < Chinese. Third, TTR was in inverse proportional to text-length. Fourth, the analysis of titled word/morpheme TTR showed various aspects from their languages. Fifth, spoken text and written text were told to have less and more than 40% of LD respectively(McCarthy, 1990), yet the Korean learners' LD did not exceed 40% although the learners' LD was written text. Thus the theory of Faerch(1984) which states LD was decided by text-type seems to be more persuasive. Sixth, it was not easy to identify NNS and NS when a text type of LD was similar. Seventh, comparing to common noun which has high proportion of LD rate of NNS, verb was two times lower than that of common noun. Eighth, LD rank of NNS was followed by common noun, verb, adjective and common adverb

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the lexical variation and lexical density shown in writing of KFL learners. In summary, first, the language-specific TTR of NNS subjects was no more than 40% of all. Second, the rate of TTR was as follows: Vietnamese < Japanese < Chinese. Third, TTR was in inverse proportional to text-length. Fourth, the analysis of titled word/morpheme TTR showed various aspects from their languages. Fifth, spoken text and written text were told to have less and more than 40% of LD respectively(McCarthy, 1990), yet the Korean learners' LD did not exceed 40% although the learners' LD was written text. Thus the theory of Faerch(1984) which states LD was decided by text-type seems to be more persuasive. Sixth, it was not easy to identify NNS and NS when a text type of LD was similar. Seventh, comparing to common noun which has high proportion of LD rate of NNS, verb was two times lower than that of common noun. Eighth, LD rank of NNS was followed by common noun, verb, adjective and common adverb

참고문헌 (31)

  1. 강범모, "국어 사용 빈도" (2009), 한국문화사
  2. 강성윤, "Personal Home Page tools" (2002), 아카데미소프트
  3. 김광해, "국어 어휘론 개설" (1993), 집문당
  4. 김영선, "국어 한자어의 형태 분석과 품사 태그", 언어과학, 15(2), pp.21~40 (2008), 한국언어과학회
  5. 김영태, "아동언어장애의 진단 및 치료" (2002), 학지사
  6. 문금현, "한국어 어휘 교육의 현황과 과제", 언어와 문화, 6(1), pp.109~135 (2010), 한국언어문화교육학회
  7. 배도용, "우리말 신체류 어휘의 구성방식과 범주적 은유 양상 연구", 언어과학, 17(4), pp.79~98 (2010), 한국언어과학회
  8. 배도용, "한국어 학습자 쓰기에 나타난 어휘 사용빈도 예비 조사", 동남어문논집, 1(31), pp.175~197 (2011), 동남어문학회
  9. 배종우, "빈도 추출기 2.0(시험판)" (2011)
  10. 서상규, "국어정보학 입문" (1999), 태학사
  11. 서정현, "한국어 교육용 어휘 선정을 위한 신문 사설의 어휘 사용 분석 연구 : 신문 사설 말뭉치 분석을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2007
  12. 안경화, "중간언어 어휘론 연구의 과제와 전망", 이중언어학, (23), pp.167~186 (2003), 이중언어학회
  13. 원미진, "한국어 어휘 교육 연구의 방향 모색", 한국어교육, 22(2), pp.255~279 (2011), 국제한국어교육학회
  14. 이원석, "중학 영어 교과서 듣기 대본의 참여자 수와 성별에 따른 대화 특징", 언어과학, 15(1), pp.141~162 (2008), 한국언어과학회
  15. 이준호, "한국어 어휘 교육 연구사 - 학위 논문을 중심으로-", 문법 교육, 9, pp.305~336 (2008), 한국문법교육학회
  16. 장경희, "중ㆍ고등학생의 어휘 다양도 연구", 한국어 의미학, 27, pp.225~242 (2008), 한국어의미학회
  17. 정동빈, "영어어휘학습지도" (2009), 한국문화사
  18. 진대연, "한국어 쓰기능력 구성요소로서의 어휘에 대한 연구", 이중언어학, (30), pp.385~418 (2006), 이중언어학회
  19. 하빛나, "국어과 학습부진아의 표현어휘 사용 양상 연구 : 중학교 1학년의 학습자 말뭉치 분석을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2009
  20. Faerch, C., "Learner Language and Language Learning" (1984), Cyldendal
  21. Granger, S., "Learner English on Computer" (1998), Longman
  22. 안동환, "코퍼스언어학개론" (2010), 한국문화사
  23. Leech, G., "Corpora Theories and Linguistic Performance, In Directions in Corpus Linguistics", pp.8~29 (1992), Mouton de Gruyter
  24. Nation, I.S.P., "Learning Vocabulary in Another Language" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  25. 이정민, "외국어 학습 연구 방법론" (2009), 한국문화사
  26. McCarthy, M. J., "어휘" (2003), 범문사
  27. Meunier, F., "Computer Tools for the Ananlysis of Learner Corpora, In Learner English on", pp.19~37 (1998), Longman
  28. Read, J., "Assessing Vocabulary" (2000), Cambridge University Press
  29. Svartvik, J., "Directions in Corpus Linguistics" (1992), Mouton de Gruyter
  30. Thornbury, S., "How to Teach Vocabulary" (2002), Longman
  31. Ure, J. N., "Lexical Density and Register Differentiation", Applications of Linguistics: Selected Papers of the Second International Congress of Applied Linguistics, pp.131~145 (1971), Cambridge University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)