본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

(Non-)symmetrical Derivation of [IO-DO-V] Word Order DOC Type: German and Korean

임익희
한국언어과학회 (The Korean Association Of Language Sciences)|2023.02|언어과학 (Journal of Language Sciences)|제30권 제1호|pp. 175-199|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.14384/kals.2023.30.1.175

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

remnant movement이중 목적어 구문scramblingDOC[IO-DO-V] word ordersemantic completenessfunction saturation[간접목적어-직접 목적어-동사] 어순잔여이동어순 썩기의미적 완전성함수 항목 충족
주제분류언어학

초록

German can undergo word order change into [IO-DO-V] in double object construction(DOC), and Korean also can. However, two languages exhibit different typological properties and derivation aspects in this word order type. The purpose of this paper is to argue the followings: First, in terms of typology, whereas German is a language with a variety of DOCs, Korean is one with highly limited DOCs. Second, whereas the [IO-DO-V] word order DOC type of German is derived by ‘a prior V raising plus remant vP or ApplP topicalization’ mechanism depending on syntactic environments, that of Korean by scrambling. Third, the [IO-DO-V] word order DOC type of Korean has a constraint by which an unsaturated function cannot be scrambled.

Abstract

German can undergo word order change into [IO-DO-V] in double object construction(DOC), and Korean also can. However, two languages exhibit different typological properties and derivation aspects in this word order type. The purpose of this paper is to argue the followings: First, in terms of typology, whereas German is a language with a variety of DOCs, Korean is one with highly limited DOCs. Second, whereas the [IO-DO-V] word order DOC type of German is derived by ‘a prior V raising plus remant vP or ApplP topicalization’ mechanism depending on syntactic environments, that of Korean by scrambling. Third, the [IO-DO-V] word order DOC type of Korean has a constraint by which an unsaturated function cannot be scrambled.

참고문헌 (54)

  1. Abels, K., "Successive Cyclicity, Anti-locality, and Adposition Stranding", Ph. D., pp.2003
  2. Adger, D., "Core Syntax: A Minimalist Approach" (2003), Oxford University Press
  3. Biskup, P., "Labels and Roots", pp.91~116 (2017), De Gruyter Mouton
  4. Bruening, B., "Double Object Constructions Disguised as Prepositional Datives", Linguistic Inquiry, 41, pp.287~305 (2010)
  5. Benjamin Bruening, "Implicit arguments in English double object constructions", Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 39(4), pp.1023~1085 (2020), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
  6. Cho, J. H., "Scrambling in Korean: Crossover, Reconstruction and Binding Theory", Ph.D., pp.1994
  7. Cho, J. H., "Theoretical Issues in Korean Linguistics", pp.255~274 (1994), CSLI
  8. Cho, J. H., "Reconstruction Effects and Intermediate A-position", Studies in Generative Grammar, 6, pp.257~279 (1996)
  9. Choi, H. W., "Optimizing Structure in Context: Scrambling and Information Structure" (1999), CSLI
  10. Chomsky, N., "Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
  11. Cook, P., "Datives and Other Cases: Between Argument Structure and Event Structure", pp.141~184 (2006), John Benjamins
  12. Czepluch, H., "Kasus im Deutschen und Englischen" (1996), Narr Verlag
  13. "Fallick. O. to appear. V2 Word Order in German", ~
  14. Fanselow, G., "Minimale Syntax" (1991), Universitat Passau
  15. Fanselow, G., "Münchhausen-Style Head Movement and the Analysis of Verb Second", Linguistics in Potsdam, 22, pp.9~49 (2004)
  16. Haider, H., "Deutsche Syntax–Generativ" (1993), Narr Verlag
  17. Haider, Hubert, "Scrambling-Non-triggered Chain Formation in OV-Languages", Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 15, pp.203~267 (2003)
  18. Hankamer, J., "What Moves in German VP-Fronting?", LSA Annual Meeting (2005)
  19. Georgala, E., "Applicatives in their Structural and Thematic Function: A Minimalist Account of Multitransitivity", Ph. D., pp.2012
  20. Grewendorf, G., "Scrambling in German and Japanese:Adjunction versus Multiple Specifiers", Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 17, pp.1~65 (1999)
  21. Holmberg, A., "The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax" (1995), Oxford University Press
  22. Hsu, B., "Verb Second and its Deviations: An Argument for Feature Scattering in the Left Periphery", Glossa: a Journal of General Linguistics, 2(1), pp.1~33 (2017)
  23. 임익희, "The Derivational Aspects of Korean Non-contrastive Heavy Adnominal Fragments: Two Strategies", 생성문법연구, 26(1), pp.15~44 (2016), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  24. Kim, K. S., "Why does Head Movement Take Place?", Proceedings of 17 SICOGG, pp.192~208 (2015)
  25. Kim, L., "Asymmetric Ditransitive Constructions: Evidence from Korean", Lingua, 165, pp.28~69 (2015)
  26. Ko, H. J., "Scrambling in Korean Syntax. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics" (2018), Oxford University Press
  27. Krifka, M., "Scope Inversion under the Rise-Fall Contour in German", Linguistic Inquiry, 29, pp.75~112 (1998)
  28. Lenerz, J., "Syntax, Vol. II", pp.1266~1276 (1995), Mouton de Gruyter
  29. Lechner, W., "A Puzzle for Remnant Movement Analyses of Verb-second", Linguistic Inquiry, 40, pp.346~356 (2009)
  30. Lee, E. S., "Types of Scrambling in In Korean Syntax", Ph. D., pp.2007
  31. Lee, H. J., "Ditransitivity Hierarchy, Semantic Compatibility and the Realization of Recipients in Korean Dative constructions", Journal of Linguistics, 56, pp.1~36 (2020)
  32. Lee, Y. S., "Scrambling as Case-driven Obligatory Movement", Ph. D., pp.1993
  33. Mahajan, A. K., "The A", A'-distinction and Movement Theory, MIT, 1990
  34. Miyagawa, S., "Against Optional Scrambling", Linguistic Inquiry, 28, pp.1~25 (1997)
  35. Miyagawa, S., "Ken Hale: A Life in Language", pp.293~338 (2001), MIT Press
  36. Miyagawa, S., "Word Order and Scrambling", pp.177~200 (2003), Blackwell
  37. Mara, F., "On Information Structure, Meaning and Form", pp.87~116 (2007), John Benjamins
  38. Müller, G., "Incomplete Category Fronting: A Derivational Approach to Remnant Movement in German" (1998), Kluwer
  39. Müller, G., "Verb-Second as vP-First", Journal of Comparative German Linguistics, 7, pp.179~234 (2004)
  40. 박명관, "Scrambling in Korean and the Labeling Theory", 현대문법연구, (102), pp.1~30 (2019), 현대문법학회[DOI]
  41. 박명관, "Variation in Double Object Formation with Dative Verbs: English vs. Korean", 영어학, 21, pp.895~911 (2021), 한국영어학회[DOI]
  42. Peter, S., "Sub-Phrasal Syntax in Korean", Language Research, 30, pp.351~386 (1994)
  43. Pylkkänen, L., "Introducing Arguments", Ph. D., pp.2002
  44. Pylkkänen, L., "Introducing Arguments" (2008), MIT Press
  45. Platzack, C., "Topics in Scandinavian Syntax", pp.185~234 (1986), Reidel
  46. Ross, J., "Constraint on Variables in Syntax", Ph. D., pp.1967
  47. Saito, M., "Some Asymmetries in J apanese and their Theoretical Implications", Ph.D., pp.1985
  48. Saito, M., "Long Distance scrambling in Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1, pp.69~118 (1992)
  49. Takano, Y., "Illicit Remnant Movement: An Argument for Feature-Driven Movement", Linguistic Inquiry, 31, pp.141~156 (2000)
  50. Vikner, S., "Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages" (1995), Oxford University Press
  51. Wegener, H., "Strukturen und Merkmale Syntaktischer Kategorien", pp.70~103 (1991), Narr Verlag
  52. Wurmbrand, S., "Licensing Case", Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 18, pp.175~236 (2006)
  53. Yoon, J. M., "Verb Movement and Structure of IP in Korean", Language Research, 26, pp.343~371 (1990)

관련 논문AI추천

In Support of the Non-Derivational Analysis of Korean Ditransitive Constructions김효식, 박자연사단법인 한국언어학회 · 언어학2024 · 제32권 제3호Verb Dynamics? Two Types of Double Object Constructions in Korean and Spanish윤나경한국언어학회 · 언어2023 · 제48권 제2호영어와 한국어의 이중목적어구문이연화한국현대언어학회 · 언어연구2011 · 제26권 제4호Argument-Centered Analysis for Scrambling최영주한국언어학회 · 언어2008 · 제33권 제4호영어의 이중목적어구문 소고이원빈새한영어영문학회 · 새한영어영문학2013 · 제55권 제1호고대영어의 이중 목적어 구문 도출김대익새한영어영문학회 · 새한영어영문학2009 · 제51권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

중학생의 영어 선택의문문 억양습득에 대한 명시적·암시적 형태초점 교수법과 오류수정피드백의 효과강예빈pp. 1-23중국어 재귀사 ‘ziji’의 인칭 제약에 대한 재고찰: 통사적 접근 방식을 중심으로강은지, 허세문pp. 25-64‘이다’의 남북한 통합 문법범주 설정에 대한 연구박효정pp. 65-102외국어로서의 한국어 교육에서 통합 및 분리 형태초점 교수법에 대한 학습자 선호도 연구서애경, 조윤경pp. 103-122「한국어 기초 사전」의 ‘주제 및 상황 범주별’ 어휘 목록의 실제성 검증 연구: 일기예보 말뭉치에 대한 ‘날씨와 계절’, ‘기후’, ‘지리정보’ 어휘 목록의 어휘 텍스트 점유율 분석을 중심으로오세원pp. 123-145
원문 보기