An Evasion Analysis of Korean Sluicing
2
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It is well-known that the derivation of Korean sluicing differs from that of English counterpart. Researchers have proposed a variety of analyses in generative grammar and the standard assumption is that Korean sluicing is derived out of (pseudo-)cleft. However, Kim (2015) poses challenges to the pseudo-cleft analysis, in that it faces empirical problems, both of which involve asymmetries between (pseudo-)clefts and sluicing. This indicates that (pseudo)-cleft cannot be the source of sluicing in Korean. In this paper I adopt Barros, Elliott, and Thoms’ (2014) evasion approach that makes non-isomorphic sources possible for the ellipsis site along with an isomorphic source. Under the evasion approach, PF deletion from the full-fledged structure is just one of the options available for sluicing. Sluicing can also be derived from other sources, such as short sources, (pseudo)-clefts, and predicational sentences. On the assumption that such non-isomorphic sources are all available as long as Question-under-Discussion is satisfied, I will argue that the challenges posed in the previous literature can be resolved.
Abstract
It is well-known that the derivation of Korean sluicing differs from that of English counterpart. Researchers have proposed a variety of analyses in generative grammar and the standard assumption is that Korean sluicing is derived out of (pseudo-)cleft. However, Kim (2015) poses challenges to the pseudo-cleft analysis, in that it faces empirical problems, both of which involve asymmetries between (pseudo-)clefts and sluicing. This indicates that (pseudo)-cleft cannot be the source of sluicing in Korean. In this paper I adopt Barros, Elliott, and Thoms’ (2014) evasion approach that makes non-isomorphic sources possible for the ellipsis site along with an isomorphic source. Under the evasion approach, PF deletion from the full-fledged structure is just one of the options available for sluicing. Sluicing can also be derived from other sources, such as short sources, (pseudo)-clefts, and predicational sentences. On the assumption that such non-isomorphic sources are all available as long as Question-under-Discussion is satisfied, I will argue that the challenges posed in the previous literature can be resolved.
참고문헌 (28)
- AnderBois, Scott, "Issues and alternatives", Doctor, pp.2011
- AnderBois, Scott, "The semantics of sluicing: beyond truth conditions", Language, 90, pp.887~926 (2014)
- Barros, Matthew, "Sluicing and identity in ellipsis", Ph. D., pp.2014
- Barros, Matthew, "There is no island repair", pp.2014
- Bošković, Željko, "The Free Word Order Phenomenon: Its Syntactic Sources and Diversity", pp.13~73 (2005), Mouton de Gruyter
- Chomsky, Noam, "Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research", pp.506~569 (1993), Walter de Gruyter
- Chung, Sandra, "BLS 31:general session and parasession on prosodic variation and change", pp.73~91 (2006)
- Chung, Sandra, "Syntactic identity in sluicing: How much and why", Linguistic Inquiry, 44, pp.1~44 (2013)
- Delahunty, Gerald, "Topics in the syntax and semantics of English cleft sentences", Ph.D., pp.1981
- Griffiths, James, "Contrast and island sensitivity in clausal ellipsis", Syntax, 17, pp.189~234 (2014)
- Missing links: cleft, sluicing, and no da construction in Japanese, "Hiraiwa, Ken", MIT, 35~54, pp.MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 43 (2002)
- Kim, Jeong-Seok, "Syntactic focus movement and ellipsis: A minimalist approach", Doctor, pp.1997
- 김지은, "What Sluicing Comes from in Korean is Pseudo-cleft", 언어, 37(1), pp.69~106 (2012), 한국언어학회
- 김종복, "The Korean Sluicing: As a Family of Constructions", 생성문법연구, 23(1), pp.103~130 (2013), 한국생성문법학회
- Kim, Jong-Bok, "Syntactic and semantic identity in Korean sluicing: A direct interpretation approach", Lingua, 166, pp.260~293 (2015)
- 김선웅, "A Predicate Inversion Analysis of Kukes in Korean “Sluicing”", 언어연구, 29(1), pp.217~233 (2012), 언어정보연구소
- Merchant, Jason, "The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis" (2001), Oxford University Press
- Merchant, Jason, "Topics in Ellipsis", pp.132~153 (2008), Cambridge University Press
- Mikkelsen, Line, "Copula Clause: Specification, Predication, and Equation" (2005), John Benjamins
- Moro, Andre, "The Raising of Predicates: Predicative Noun Phrases and the Theory of Clause Structure" (1997), Cambridge University Press
- Park, Myung-Kwan, "Subject-less clefts in Korean: towards a deletion analysis", Language Research, 37, pp.715~739 (2001)
- 박소영, "한국어 수문문에 대한 분열문 분석 재고", 언어학, (71), pp.113~138 (2015), 사단법인 한국언어학회[DOI]
- Reeve, Matthew, "Clefts", Doctor, pp.2010
- Rodrigues, Cilene, "Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory", pp.175~198 (2009), John Benjamins
- Rooth, Matthew, "A theory of focus interpretation", Natural Language Semantics, 1, pp.75~116 (1992)
- Sohn, Keun-Won, "A non-sluicing, non-clefting approach to copula constructions", Studies in Generative Grammar, 14, pp.561~571 (2000)
- van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen, "Invisible last resort: A note on clefts as the underlying source for sluicing", Lingua, 120, pp.1714~1726 (2010)
- Weir, Andrew, "Fragments and clausal ellipsis", Doctor, pp.2014