본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Base-generated Fragment Approach to Sluicing Constructions

2

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

Sluicing in Korean is distinguished from that in wh-fronting languages in that it requires a copula as well as a wh-phrase in embedded contexts. Observing certain parallelism between sluicing and fragments in Korean such as presence of a copula and case connectivity, this paper argues that sluiced sentences in Korean should be treated as fragments that appear both in embedded and matrix contexts. In contrast to previous analyses that posit either ellipsis or a null pronominal within the sluiced clauses, this paper proposes that Korean sluiced sentences be analyzed as base-generated fragments along the lines of Ginzburg and Sag (2000).

Abstract

Sluicing in Korean is distinguished from that in wh-fronting languages in that it requires a copula as well as a wh-phrase in embedded contexts. Observing certain parallelism between sluicing and fragments in Korean such as presence of a copula and case connectivity, this paper argues that sluiced sentences in Korean should be treated as fragments that appear both in embedded and matrix contexts. In contrast to previous analyses that posit either ellipsis or a null pronominal within the sluiced clauses, this paper proposes that Korean sluiced sentences be analyzed as base-generated fragments along the lines of Ginzburg and Sag (2000).

참고문헌 (16)

  1. Chan Chung, "Korean Copula Constructions: A Construction and Linearization Perspective", 언어, 27(2), pp.171~193 (2002), 한국언어학회
  2. Chung, S., "Sluicing and logical form", Natural Language Semantics, 3, pp.239~282 (1995)
  3. Culicover, P. W., "Simpler syntax" (2005), Oxford University Press
  4. Ginzburg, J., "Interrogatives: questions, facts, and dialogue, In Handbook of contemporary semantic theory", pp.385~422 (1996), Blackwell
  5. Ginzburg, J., "Interrogative investigations: The form, meaning, and use of English interrogatives" (2000), CSLI Publications
  6. 조정민, "Sluicing? It's Just One of Copular Constructions", 언어학, 13(2), pp.143~167 (2005), 대한언어학회
  7. Merchant, J., "The syntax of silence" (2001), Oxford University Press
  8. Nishiyama, K., "Syntactic movement of overt wh-phrases in Japanese and Korean", Japanese, 1996, pp.5, 337~351
  9. Kim, J. -S., "Sluicing in Japanese and Korean", Korean Journal of Linguistics, 25(2), pp.271~290 (2000)
  10. Park, M. -K., "Subject-less clefts in Korean : towards a deletion analysis", Language Research, 37(4), pp.715~739 (2001)
  11. 박명관, "On Postposition Pied Piping and Stranding in Subjectless Cleft Constructions of Korean", 현대문법연구, 57(57), pp.43~68 (2009), 현대문법학회
  12. Pollard, C., "A unified theory of scope for quantifiers and wh-phrases", Journal of Linguistics, 34(2), pp.415~445 (1998)
  13. Ross, J. R., "Guess who?", Proceedings of the 5th annual meeting of Chicago linguistic society, pp.252~286 (1969), Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago
  14. Sohn, K. -W., "A non-sluicing, non-clefting approach to copular constructions (written in Korean)", Studies in Generative Grammar, 10, pp.267~295 (2000)
  15. Takahashi, D., "Sluicing in Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 3, pp.241~265 (1994)
  16. Yoo, E. J., "Quantifiers and wh-interrogatives in the syntax- semantics interface", 박사, pp.1997

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)