On a Word Order Restriction in Korean Comparatives
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, I discuss and examine the following word order restriction in Korean comparatives: The overt compared constituent (DP or AdvP) does not undergo scrambling, unlike regular DPs or AdvPs. During the discussion, adapting Choe (2014)'s proposal which suggests a functional category to explain the structure of comparatives, I speculate that the compared constituent is the projection of the functional category and that it may not undergo scrambling because of the following word order restriction: A certain type of functional category projection containing a null operator does not undergo scrambling in Korean.
Abstract
In this paper, I discuss and examine the following word order restriction in Korean comparatives: The overt compared constituent (DP or AdvP) does not undergo scrambling, unlike regular DPs or AdvPs. During the discussion, adapting Choe (2014)'s proposal which suggests a functional category to explain the structure of comparatives, I speculate that the compared constituent is the projection of the functional category and that it may not undergo scrambling because of the following word order restriction: A certain type of functional category projection containing a null operator does not undergo scrambling in Korean.
참고문헌 (5)
- 최현숙, "On the Operator Movement in Korean Comparatives: Is It LBE or Pied-piping?", 생성문법연구, 21(3), pp.485~500 (2011), 한국생성문법학회
- Choe, Hyon Sook, "The functional category COM(PARISON) and its double complement structure", Nels 43, 1, pp.51~64 (2014), GLSA
- Chomsky, Noam, "Formal Syntax", pp.71~132 (1977), Academic Press
- Kennedy, Christopher, "Comparative deletion and optionality in syntax", Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 20, pp.553~621 (2002)
- Sag, Ivan, "Deletion and Logical Form", Ph.D, pp.1976