Korean Clausal Comparatives Revisited: Korean has genuine clausal comparatives
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper argues that Korean has genuine clausal comparatives which have degree abstraction-structures involved. This paper examines kes- comparatives in Korean which have clausal forms at surface, dividing them into two sub-types: predicative and attributive kes-comparatives. Predicative kes-comparatives have individual- denoting DP structures, getting a phrasal analysis whereas attributive kes- comparatives are ambiguous between degree-denoting CP structures and individual- denoting DP structures, getting either a clausal analysis or a phrasal analysis. Korean is not distinct from English in that they both have clausal comparatives which involve degree abstraction structures. The degree abstraction parameter, proposed by Beck et al. (2004), is not applicable to Korean comparatives.
Abstract
This paper argues that Korean has genuine clausal comparatives which have degree abstraction-structures involved. This paper examines kes- comparatives in Korean which have clausal forms at surface, dividing them into two sub-types: predicative and attributive kes-comparatives. Predicative kes-comparatives have individual- denoting DP structures, getting a phrasal analysis whereas attributive kes- comparatives are ambiguous between degree-denoting CP structures and individual- denoting DP structures, getting either a clausal analysis or a phrasal analysis. Korean is not distinct from English in that they both have clausal comparatives which involve degree abstraction structures. The degree abstraction parameter, proposed by Beck et al. (2004), is not applicable to Korean comparatives.
참고문헌 (38)
- Beck, S, "Parametric Variation in the Semantics of Comparison: Japanese vs. English", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 13, pp.289~344 (2004)
- Bhatt, R, "Reduced and Unreduced Phrasal Comparatives", Umass & University of Tokyo, ~ (2008)
- Bresnan,J, "Syntax of the Comparative Clause Construction in English", Linguistic Inquiry, 4, pp.275~343 (1973)
- 최현숙, "On the Categorial Ambiguity of the Morpheme kes in Korean", 어학연구, 43(2), pp.229~264 (2007), 언어교육원
- 최현숙, "On the nature of the optionality of the morpheme te in Korean phrasal comparatives", 생성문법연구, 18(4), pp.717~741 (2008), 한국생성문법학회
- Choe, Hyon-Sook, "Korean Clausal Comparatives as Subcomparatives", TEAL, 5 (2008)
- Chomsky,N, "On Wh-movement in Formal Syntax" (1977), Academic Press
- Fox,D, "Economy and Semantic Interpretation" (2000), MIT Press
- Hackl,M, "Comparative Quantifiers", 박사, pp.2000
- Hazout, I, "Comparative Ellipsis and Logical Form", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 13, pp.1~37 (1995)
- Hankamer, J, "Why There are Two than’s in English", CLS, 9, pp.179~191 (1973)
- Heim,I, "Notes on comparative and relative matters", University of Texas, ~ (1985)
- Heim, I, "Degree Operators and Scope", Proceedings of SALT X, pp.40~64 (2000)
- Izvorski, R, "A Solution to the Subcomparative Paradox", WCCFL, 14, pp.203~219 (1995)
- Kennedy,C, "Projecting the Adjective: The Syntax and Semantics of Gradability and Comparison", UCSC, ~ (1997)
- Kennedy,C, "Modes of Comparison", Proceedings of CLS, 43 (2008)
- Kennedy, C, "Attributive Comparative Deletion", NLLT, 18, pp.89~146 (2000)
- Kennedy, C, "The Case of the Missing CP and the Secret Case", 석사, pp.2001
- Kim,Jong-Bok, "Syntax and Semantics of Korean Comparative Constructions: a Constraint-based Approach", ~ (2009)
- Ko, Young-Geun, "Wulimal Munpeplon (The Grammar of Korean)", Cipmuntang, ~ (2008)
- Lechner,W, "Comparatives and DP Structure", 박사, pp.1999
- Lechner, W, "Reduced and Phrasal Comparatives", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 19(4), pp.683~735 (2001)
- Lechner,W, "Ellipsis in Comparatives" (2004), Mouton de Gruyter
- Lechner, W, "On Binding Scope and Ellipsis Scope" (2006), Oxford University Press
- Lin,J, "Chinese Comparatives and Their Implicational Parameters", Natural Language Semantics, 17, pp.1~27 (2009)
- Link,G, "The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: a lattice-theoretic approach in Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language", pp.302~323 (1987), De Gruyter
- Merchant, J, "Fragments and Ellipsis", Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, pp.661~738 (2004)
- Merchant,J, "Ellipsis in Comparatives", University of Chicago, ~ (2006)
- Napoili, J. D, "Comparative Ellipsis: a phrase structure account", Linguistic Inquiry, 14, pp.675~694 (1983)
- Park,So-Young, "Functional Categories: the Syntax of DP and DegP", 박사, pp.2008
- Park,So-Young, "Three Types of Korean Comparatives", J, 2009, pp.16, ~[DOI]
- Pancheva,R, "Phrasal and Clausal Comparatives in Slavic", Proceedings of FASL, 14 (2006)
- Pancheva,R, "More Students Attended FASL than CONSOLE", Proceedings of FASL, 18 (2010)
- Rullman,H, "Maximality in the Semantics of Wh-constructions", 박사, pp.1995
- Shimoyama, J, "Clausal Comparatives and Cross-linguistic Variation", Proceedings of NELS, 39
- Sudo,Y, "Invisible Degree Nominals in Japanese Clausal Comparatives", Proceedings of WAFL, 5 (2009)
- Xiang,M, "A Phrasal Analysis of Chinese Comparatives", Proceedings of CLS, 39 (2003)
- 윤항진, "The structure of kes-clefts and the syntactic status of kes in Korean", 생성문법연구, 18(3), pp.459~475 (2008), 한국생성문법학회