본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Elliptical Contrastive Topic Construction and Theories of Multi-elemental Fragments

정대호
한국생성문법학회|2021.02|생성문법연구 (Studies in Generative Grammar)|제31권 제1호|pp. 169-193|DOI 10.15860/sigg.31.1.202102.169

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

contrastive topic constructionmultiple fragmentextra deletionright dislocationoblique mergepositional asymmetry
주제분류언어학

초록

To account for the positional (final vs. non-final) asymmetry observed in elliptical contexts (Park 2005, 2013, Park and Shin 2014, Ku and Cho 2014, Chung 2015a, b, among others), several proposals have been made in the literature including An’s (2016, 2018) extra deletion approach, Ahn and Cho’s (2017a, b) repetitive gapless right dislocation analysis, and Chung’s (2015a, b) oblique merge approach. This article addresses a novel type of fragment called an elliptical contrastive topic construction (ECTC, Chung 2020) and examines which of the theories proposed thus far best accounts for the characteristics of the construction. In particular, it will be shown that neither An’s nor Ahn and Cho’s theory properly captures certain important syntactic and semantic properties of the ECTC, while there is some room for Chung’s approach to accommodate them.

Abstract

To account for the positional (final vs. non-final) asymmetry observed in elliptical contexts (Park 2005, 2013, Park and Shin 2014, Ku and Cho 2014, Chung 2015a, b, among others), several proposals have been made in the literature including An’s (2016, 2018) extra deletion approach, Ahn and Cho’s (2017a, b) repetitive gapless right dislocation analysis, and Chung’s (2015a, b) oblique merge approach. This article addresses a novel type of fragment called an elliptical contrastive topic construction (ECTC, Chung 2020) and examines which of the theories proposed thus far best accounts for the characteristics of the construction. In particular, it will be shown that neither An’s nor Ahn and Cho’s theory properly captures certain important syntactic and semantic properties of the ECTC, while there is some room for Chung’s approach to accommodate them.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. 안희돈, "A Bi-clausal Analysis of Multiple Fragments", 생성문법연구, 27(1), pp.197~220 (2017), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  2. 안희돈, "A hybrid ellipsis analysis of two types of fragments in Korean", 언어연구, 34(3), pp.311~359 (2017), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  3. 안희돈, "Notes on Bi-clausal Analysis of Multiple Fragments: A Reply to Chung (2019)", 생성문법연구, 29(3), pp.571~590 (2019), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  4. 안희돈, "On an Apparent Violation of the Left Branch Condition", 생성문법연구, 30(1), pp.155~174 (2020), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  5. An, Duk-Ho, "Extra deletion in fragment answers and its implications", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 25, pp.313~350 (2016)
  6. An Duk-Ho, "Another way to avoid islands", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 27, pp.173~209 (2018)
  7. Bittner, Maria, "The structural determination of Case and agreement", Linguistic Inquiry, 27, pp.1~68 (1996)
  8. Büring, Daniel, "The Meaning of Topic and Focus: The 59th Street Bridge Accent (Routledge Studies in German Linguistics)" (1997), Routledge
  9. Büring, Daniel, "On D-trees, beans, and B-accents", Linguistics and Philosophy, 26(5), pp.511~545 (2003)
  10. Büring, Daniel, "The Architecture of Focus", pp.321~346 (2006), Mouton De Gruyter
  11. Choi, Youngju, "Fragments with and without articulated constituents of LF", Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, pp.177~188 (2009)
  12. Chung, Daeho, "WH-scope identification via quasi-binding", Japanese, 1997, pp.7, 293~309
  13. Chung, Daeho, "Wh-questions without Wh-words", The Preceedings of the 14th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, pp.57~66 (2000)
  14. 정대호, "WH-Ellipsis and the Theory of Ellipsis", 생성문법연구, 13(3), pp.405~428 (2003), 한국생성문법학회
  15. Chung, Daeho, "A string deletion analysis of multi-elemented fragmental answers", Proceedings of 2014 Fall Conference of the Korean Generative Grammar Circle, pp.21~36 (2014)
  16. Chung, Daeho, "An oblique merge analysis of multi-elemental fragment answers in Korean", Proceedings of the 17th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar, pp.68~93 (2015)
  17. 정대호, "On the syntax of multi-focused fragment answers in Korean: An oblique merge analysis", 언어연구, 32(3), pp.573~606 (2015), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  18. Chung, Daeho, "Syntax and semantics of fragmental question ‘XPn -nun?’ in Korean", paper presented at 2020 Dongguk Occasional Workshop on Mismatches in Ellipsis (2020)
  19. Chung, Daeho, "In preparation. Hankwuke tacwung chocem kwumwunkwa sasencek ilchi", pyenghap (Multiple Focus Constructions in Korean and Oblique Agree, ms, pp.Hanyang University
  20. Korean Linguistics 7, "Japanese", pp.1998, Han, Chung-hye
  21. Heinat, Fredrik, "Why phrases probe", Ms, pp.2005
  22. Heinat, Fredrik, "Probing phrases, pronouns, and binding", paper presented GLOW 2006 (2006)
  23. 구나현, "Markers, Index, and Multiple Fragment Answers in Korean", 생성문법연구, 24(3), pp.591~612 (2014), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  24. 전영철, "대조 화제와 대조 초점의 표지 ‘는’", 한글, (274), pp.171~200 (2006), 한글학회
  25. Lamontagne, Greg, "The syntax of adjacency", Proceedings of the Sixth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, pp.173~186 (1987), CSLI Publications
  26. Lee, Chungmin, "Contrative Topic and", or Contrastive Focus, 2003, pp.12, 352~364
  27. Merchant, Jason, "The Syntax of Silence" (2001), Oxford University Press
  28. Merchant, Jason, "Fragments and ellipsis", Linguistic and Philosophy, 27(6), pp.661~738 (2004)
  29. Park, Bum-Sik, "Locality and identity in ellipsis", PhD, pp.2005
  30. 박범식, "Multiple fragment answers in Korean", 언어연구, 30(3), pp.453~472 (2013), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  31. 박명관, "The Syntax of Multiple Fragments in Korean: Overt Absorption, Max-Elide, and Scrambling", 어학연구, 52(3), pp.421~450 (2016), 언어교육원
  32. 박명관, "On the Syntax of Multiple Fragments in Korean", 현대문법연구, (80), pp.1~22 (2014), 현대문법학회[DOI]
  33. Saito, Mamoru, "Additional-wh effects and the adjunction site theory", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 3, pp.195~240 (1994)
  34. Selkirk, Elisabeth, "Handbook of phonological theory", pp.550~569 (1995), Blackwell
  35. Sohn, Keun-Won, "Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics 1, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 24", pp.315~334 (1994), Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT
  36. Takano, Yuji, "Surprising constituents", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 11, pp.243~301 (2002)
  37. Wagner, Michael, "Contrastive topics decomposed", Semantics and Pragmatics, 5, pp.1~54 (2012)
  38. Watanabe, Akira, "Subjacency and s-structure movement of wh-in-situ", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1, pp.255~291 (1992)
  39. Webelhuth, Gert, "Principles and Parameters of Syntactic Saturation" (1992), Oxford University Press

관련 논문AI추천

NUN-marked vs. Non-NUN-marked Fragmental Questions in Korean정대호인지과학연구소 · Journal of Cognitive Science2022 · 제23권 제3호Some Notes on Ahn and Cho‘s (2017a, b, c) Approach to Fragment Answers in Korean정대호한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2019 · 제29권 제2호Fragments and Ellipsis in Korean박범식한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2008 · 제18권 제1호A hybrid ellipsis analysis of two types of fragments in Korean안희돈, 조성은한국현대언어학회 · 언어연구2017 · 제34권 제3호A Bi-clausal Analysis of Multiple Fragments안희돈, 조성은한국생성문법학회 · 생성문법연구2017 · 제27권 제1호On the syntax of multi-focused fragment answers in Korean: An oblique merge analysis정대호한국현대언어학회 · 언어연구2015 · 제32권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)

Semantic Compatibility Condition in American English: A Big Data-based Trend Analysis of Ethnic Slurs윤수원pp. 1-24Where and Why are Labels Necessary?Barrie Michael Jonathan Mathewpp. 25-52Specified Subject Condition Effects in Korean Multiple Subject Constructions and Their Implications윤정미pp. 53-85Toward a Uniform Analysis of Romance SE성문현, Barrie Michael Jonathan Mathewpp. 87-105한국어 유사수문구문의 두 가지 구조와 특정성이숙희pp. 107-128
원문 보기