본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

On the syntax of multi-focused fragment answers in Korean: An oblique merge analysis

1

조회

0

다운로드

14

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

As observed in the literature (Park 2005, 2013, Park and Shin 2014, Ku and Cho 2014, among others), focus elements in a multi-focused fragment answer in Korean behave asymmetrically depending on their positions: Focus elements in a non-final position retain their dependent markers, while those in the final position optionally delete them. This paper first shows that the restriction is merely a subcase of a superordinate constraint, which states that a focus element in a non-final position pied-pipes the minimal node that dominates it and c-commands the following focus element(s), whereas a focus element in the final position optionally pied-pipes its dominating node(s). It is argued then that the pied-piping for non-final focus elements is caused by an economy-driven oblique merge operation that clusters elements with a focus feature before the complex focus element formed in this way moves to the focus licensing functional phrase. Focus clustering due to the same oblique merge operation is attested in other constructions containing multiple focus elements.

Abstract

As observed in the literature (Park 2005, 2013, Park and Shin 2014, Ku and Cho 2014, among others), focus elements in a multi-focused fragment answer in Korean behave asymmetrically depending on their positions: Focus elements in a non-final position retain their dependent markers, while those in the final position optionally delete them. This paper first shows that the restriction is merely a subcase of a superordinate constraint, which states that a focus element in a non-final position pied-pipes the minimal node that dominates it and c-commands the following focus element(s), whereas a focus element in the final position optionally pied-pipes its dominating node(s). It is argued then that the pied-piping for non-final focus elements is caused by an economy-driven oblique merge operation that clusters elements with a focus feature before the complex focus element formed in this way moves to the focus licensing functional phrase. Focus clustering due to the same oblique merge operation is attested in other constructions containing multiple focus elements.

참고문헌 (47)

  1. Ahn, Hee-Don, "A study on fragments: Focused on English and Korean" (2012), Hankwukmwunwhasa
  2. 안희돈, "한국어 어미와 선어말어미의 형태론적 처리: 점화실험을 중심으로", 언어과학연구, 59(59), pp.181~202 (2011), 언어과학회
  3. Hee-Don Ahn, "Layered Nominal Structures: Implications for Caseless Nominals", 언어, 31(2), pp.165~185 (2006), 한국언어학회
  4. 안희돈, "Unpronounced Case Markers and Apparent Subject-Object Asymmetry", 현대문법연구, 43(43), pp.55~80 (2006), 현대문법학회
  5. 조성은, "Selected Papers from the 2006 Cyprus Syntaxfest", pp.29~62 (2009), Cambridge Scholars Publishing
  6. 안희돈, "Notes on Two Types of Fragments", 언어연구, 28(1), pp.19~35 (2011), 언어정보연구소
  7. 안희돈, "On Caseless Fragments in Korean", 현대문법연구, 10(70), pp.25~47 (2012), 현대문법학회
  8. Büring, Daniel, "The architecture of focus", pp.321~346 (2006), Mouton De Gruyter
  9. Choi, Youngju, "Fragments with and without articulated constituents of LF. In Anisa Schardi, Martin Walkow and Muhammad Abdurrahman(eds. ), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, 177-188", Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, pp.177~188 (2009)
  10. Chomsky, Noam, "Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), The MIT Press
  11. Chomsky, Noam, "Structueres and beyond", pp.104~131 (2004), Oxford University Press
  12. Culicover, Peter, "Simpler syntax" (2005), Oxford University Press
  13. Agreement is feature sharing, "Frampton, John", Northeastern University, ~ (2000)
  14. Gärtner, Hans-Martin, "In Rrebekah Baglini, Timothy Grinsell, Jonathan Keane, Adam Roth Singerman, and Julia Thomas(eds", CLS, 46(1), pp.137~146 (2014), The Chicago Linguistic Society
  15. Ginzburg, Jonathan, "Interrogative investigations: The form, meaning, and use of English interrogatives" (2000), CSLI Publications
  16. Grewendorf, Günther, "Multiple wh-fronting", Linguistic Inquiry, 32, pp.87~122 (2001)
  17. Hartmann, Katharina, "Right node raising and gapping: Interface conditions on prosodic deletion" (2000), John Benjamins
  18. Ha, Seungwan, "Ellipsis, right node raising, and across-the-board movement", PhD, pp.2008
  19. Hong, Yong-Tcheol, "Incorporation theory and the distribution of case morphemes", Studies in Generative Grammar, 4, pp.1~43 (1994)
  20. "French Language Education", 2004, 295~314
  21. 홍용철, "명사구 내 보충어에의 격 표지 부재와 인접에 의한 가시성 조건 만족", 생성문법연구, 25(3), pp.603~629 (2015), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  22. 김종복, "Fragments in Korean: A Direct Interpretation Approach", 생성문법연구, 25(3), pp.703~733 (2015), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  23. Ko, Heejeong, "Right dislocation as specificational focus", Talk presented at Workshop on Korean-Japanese Linguistics at SNU (2014), Seoul National University
  24. 고희정, "Two Ways to the Right: A Hybrid approach to Right-dislocation in Korean", 어학연구, 51(1), pp.3~40 (2015), 언어교육원
  25. 구나현, "Markers, Index, and Multiple Fragment Answers in Korean", 생성문법연구, 24(3), pp.591~612 (2014), 한국생성문법학회
  26. 이정훈, "韓國語 後補充 構文의 構造", 어문연구(語文硏究), 37(2), pp.31~54 (2009), 한국어문교육연구회
  27. Merchant, Jason, "The syntax of silence" (2001), Oxford University Press
  28. Merchant, Jason, "Fragments and ellipsis", Linguistic and Philosophy, 27(6), pp.661~738 (2004)
  29. Morgan, Jerry, "Sentence fragments revisited", CLS, 25, pp.228~241 (1989), Chicago Linguistic Society
  30. Park, Bum-Sik, "Locality and identity in ellipsis", PhD, pp.2005
  31. 박범식, "Multiple fragment answers in Korean", 언어연구, 30(3), pp.453~472 (2013), 언어정보연구소
  32. Park, Myung-Kwan, "A morpho-syntactic study of Korean verbal inflection", PhD, pp.1994
  33. Park, Myung-Kwan, "Sluicing in English and Korean", Handout presented at the Linguistic Society of Korea Winter Workshop (1998)
  34. 박명관, "On the Syntax of Multiple Fragments in Korean", 현대문법연구, (80), pp.1~22 (2014), 현대문법학회[DOI]
  35. Pesetsky, David, "Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.355~426 (2001), The MIT Press
  36. Pesetsky, David, "The syntax of time", pp.495~537 (2004), The MIT Press
  37. Rezac, Milan, "The fine structure of cyclic agree", Syntax, 6, pp.156~182 (2003)
  38. Rudin, Catherine, "On multiple questions and multiple wh-fronting", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6, pp.445~501 (1988)
  39. Sabel, Joachim, "Deriving multiple head and phrasal movement : The cluster hypothesis", Linguistic Inquiry, 32, pp.532~547 (2001)
  40. Saito, Mamoru, "Additional-wh effects and the adjunction site theory", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 3, pp.195~240 (1994)
  41. Schwarzschild, Roger, "GIVENness, avoid F and other constraints on the placement of focus", Natural Language Semantics, 7(2), pp.141~177 (1999)
  42. Selkirk, Elisabeth, "Handbook of phonological theory", pp.550~569 (1995), Blackwell
  43. Adjunction to argument, free ride and a minimalist program, In Formal Approaches to Japanese Linguistics 1, "Sohn, Keun-Won", Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT, ~, pp.MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 24 (1994)
  44. Watanabe, Akira, "Subjacency and S-structure movement of wh-in-situ", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1, pp.255~291 (1992)
  45. Korean verbal inflection and checking theory. In The Morphology-syntax Connection, "Yoon, James Hye-Suk", 251~270, pp.MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 22 (1994)
  46. Yoon, James Hye-Suk, "Coordination (a)symmetries", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 7, pp.3~32 (1997), Hanshinmwunhwasa
  47. Yoon, J. Hye-Suk, "The architecture of right dislocation in Korean and Japanese", 석사, pp.2009

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)