Specified Subject Condition Effects in Korean Multiple Subject Constructions and Their Implications
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
One basic restriction for multiple subject constructions in Korean is that it is preferable for the first, non-argument subject to be linked to a gap in the second, argument subject position. In this paper, I first show that the effect of this condition can be explained in terms of the Specified Subject Condition (Chomsky 1973) if we assume that multiple subject constructions involve A-movement. Positing A-movement, however, will face problems with various locality constraints in that the posited A-movement can violate the constraints on both A- and A’-movements, and I explore this issue in the latter part of the paper. An answer for this problem, I suggest, can be found if we acknowledge that non-clause-bounded A-movement is syntactically possible in Korean and that the Tensed S Condition and the Specified Subject Condition have a processing nature, similar to Island Constraints.
Abstract
One basic restriction for multiple subject constructions in Korean is that it is preferable for the first, non-argument subject to be linked to a gap in the second, argument subject position. In this paper, I first show that the effect of this condition can be explained in terms of the Specified Subject Condition (Chomsky 1973) if we assume that multiple subject constructions involve A-movement. Positing A-movement, however, will face problems with various locality constraints in that the posited A-movement can violate the constraints on both A- and A’-movements, and I explore this issue in the latter part of the paper. An answer for this problem, I suggest, can be found if we acknowledge that non-clause-bounded A-movement is syntactically possible in Korean and that the Tensed S Condition and the Specified Subject Condition have a processing nature, similar to Island Constraints.
참고문헌 (38)
- Baker, Mark, "Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing" (1988), University of Chicago Press
- Barss Andrew, "Chains and anaphoric dependence", Ph. D, pp.1986
- Chomsky, Noam, "A Festschrift for Morris Halle", pp.232~286 (1973), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
- Chomsky, Noam, "Barriers" (1986), MIT Press
- Cole, Peter, "Subjecthood and islandhood: evidence from Quechua", Linguistic Inquiry, 12, pp.1~30 (1981)
- Dowty, David, "Themaitc proto-roles and argument selection", Language, 67, pp.547~619 (1991)
- Erteschik-Shir, Nomi, "More on extractability from quasi-NPs", Linguistic Inquiry, 12, pp.665~670 (1981)
- Grimshaw, Jane, "Argument Structure" (1990), MIT Press
- Han, Chung-Hye, "Are there 'double relative clauses' in Korean?", Linguistic Inquiry, 35, pp.315~337 (2004)
- Hofmeister, Peter, "Cognitive constraints and island effects", Language, 86, pp.366~415 (2010)
- Jackendoff, Ray, "Semantic Structures" (1990), MIT Press
- Jake, Janice, "Raising in Kipsigis", Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 9(2), pp.131~155 (1979)
- Jang, Young-Jun, "Multiple subjects and characteristic property", Discourse and Cognition, 5, pp.99~116 (1998)
- 김종복, "Parsing Two Types of Multiple Nominative Constructions: A Constructional Approach", 언어와 정보, 11(1), pp.25~38 (2007), 한국언어정보학회
- Kluender, Robert, "Island Constraint", pp.223~258 (1992), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Kluender, Robert, "Syntax and Semantics, vol. 29: The Limits of Syntax", pp.241~279 (1998), Academic Press
- Kluender, Robert, "Subjacency as a processing phenomenon", Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, pp.573~633 (1993)
- Kuno, Susumu, "The Structure of the Japanese Language" (1973), MIT Press
- Kuno, Susumu, "Functional Syntax" (1987), University of Chicago Press
- Kuroda, Sige-Yuki, "The categorical and the thetic judgment", Foundations of Language, 9, pp.153~185 (1972)
- Ladusaw, William A., "Thetic and categorical, stage and individual, weak and strong", Proceedings of SALT-IV, pp.220~229 (1994), CLC Publications
- Rizzi, Luigi, "Relativized Minimality" (1990), MIT Press
- Ross, J. Robert, "Constraints on variables in syntax", Ph. D., pp.1967
- Schütze, Carlson T., "Korean “Case stacking” isn’t: unifying nonCase uses of Case particles", Proceedings of NELS, 26, pp.351~366 (1996)
- Seiter, William, "Studies in Niuean Syntax" (1980), Garland Publishing
- The distribution of topic- and nominative-marked phrases in Korean: The universality of IP structure, "Suh, Sungki", 278~298, pp.MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 16 (1992)
- Sungki Suh, "The Distribution of Multiple Subject Constructions in Korean", 어학연구, 39(4), pp.839~857 (2003), 언어교육원
- Yoon, James H, "Some queries concerning the syntax of multiple subject constructions in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 2, pp.138~162 (1987)
- Yoon, James H., "The independence of grammatical case from interpretive factors", paper presented at the 2004 Linguistic Society of Korean International Conference (2004)
- Yoon, James H., "Raising of major arguments in Korean and Japanese", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25, pp.615~653 (2007)
- Yoon, Jong-Yeol, "Korean syntax and generalized X-bar theory", Ph. D, pp.1990
- Yoon, Jeong-Me, "ECM and multiple subject constructions in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 3, pp.369~382 (1989)
- Yoon, Jeong-Me., "The syntax of A-chains: a typological study of ECM and scrambling", Ph. D, pp.1991
- Yoon, Jeong-Me, "Non-clause-bounded A-movement: a cross-linguistic study of ECM constructions", Language Research, 29, pp.495~534 (1993)
- 윤정미, "Aspect and Agentivity in Korean Multiple Subject Constructions", 생성문법연구, 19(2), pp.211~237 (2009), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 윤영은, "The English Resultative and Experiential Perfects: A Reply to Mittwoch (2008)", 언어, 36(1), pp.133~155 (2011), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 윤정미, "Constructions Sharing Similar Restrictions with MSCs in Korean and the Processing Approach to Island Effects", 생성문법연구, 25(2), pp.377~411 (2015), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 윤정미, "On the nature of the restrictions for Multiple Subject Constructions in Korean", 언어연구, 35(3), pp.415~447 (2018), 언어정보연구소[DOI]