A hybrid ellipsis analysis of two types of fragments in Korean
2
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Nominal fragments in Korean can take two different forms: case-marked forms and caseless forms. Previous approaches to the two types of fragments are divided into two directions: uniform analyses and hybrid analyses. Uniform analyses are further classified into two species: direct interpretation approaches and ellipsis approaches. The direct interpretation approaches basically assume that fragments are non-sentential XPs. On this view, the unexpressed parts of the fragments’ interpretation are supplied not through syntactic structure but via correspondence with the meaning of the antecedent sentence. The ellipsis approaches, by contrast, assume that fragments have sentential sources and are derived through deletion process. Hybrid analyses, on the other hand, suggest that some fragments involve sentential sources and that others are non-sentential XPs. We propose that both case-marked and caseless fragments involve movement and TP deletion but that their sentential sources are not identical—a hybrid ellipsis analysis. We show that parallel behaviors of two types of fragments are explained under the assumption that they have sentential sources, while non-parallel behaviors are explained because of their different sentential sources. Our analysis further offers fresh accounts for adnonimal modifier fragments and their interesting contrasts.
Abstract
Nominal fragments in Korean can take two different forms: case-marked forms and caseless forms. Previous approaches to the two types of fragments are divided into two directions: uniform analyses and hybrid analyses. Uniform analyses are further classified into two species: direct interpretation approaches and ellipsis approaches. The direct interpretation approaches basically assume that fragments are non-sentential XPs. On this view, the unexpressed parts of the fragments’ interpretation are supplied not through syntactic structure but via correspondence with the meaning of the antecedent sentence. The ellipsis approaches, by contrast, assume that fragments have sentential sources and are derived through deletion process. Hybrid analyses, on the other hand, suggest that some fragments involve sentential sources and that others are non-sentential XPs. We propose that both case-marked and caseless fragments involve movement and TP deletion but that their sentential sources are not identical—a hybrid ellipsis analysis. We show that parallel behaviors of two types of fragments are explained under the assumption that they have sentential sources, while non-parallel behaviors are explained because of their different sentential sources. Our analysis further offers fresh accounts for adnonimal modifier fragments and their interesting contrasts.
참고문헌 (86)
- Abney, Steven, "The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect", Ph.D., pp.1987
- Ahn, Hee-Don, "Preliminary remarks on Korean NP", Papers from the sixty international conference on Korean linguistics, pp.1~15 (1988), Hanshin Publishing Co
- Ahn, Hee-Don, (2012), Hankuk Mwunhwasa
- 안희돈, "On Scope Asymmetries in Fragments", 생성문법연구, 15(4), pp.661~678 (2005), 한국생성문법학회
- 안희돈, "On Form-Function Mismatch Puzzles in Fragments: An Ellipsis Approach", 담화와 인지, 13(1), pp.91~110 (2006), 담화·인지언어학회
- Ahn, Hee-Don, "Selected Papers from the 2006 Cyprus Syntaxfest", pp.29~62 (2009), Cambridge Scholars Publishing
- 안희돈, "Notes on Two Types of Fragments", 언어연구, 28(1), pp.19~35 (2011), 언어정보연구소
- 안희돈, "On Caseless Fragments in Korean", 현대문법연구, (70), pp.25~47 (2012), 현대문법학회
- Ahn, Hee-Don, "On two types of fragments in Korean", Paper presented at Language and Information Society (2014)
- 안희돈, "Right Dislocation vs. Fragment: A Reply to Ko (2014)", 생성문법연구, 25(2), pp.427~446 (2015), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- 안희돈, "Notes on Ellipsis and Movement Asymmetries", 언어, 40(2), pp.249~269 (2015), 한국언어학회
- 안희돈, "A Uniform Analysis of Right Dislocation: A Reply to Ko (2016)", 어학연구, 52(2), pp.213~245 (2016), 언어교육원
- 안희돈, "A Bi-clausal Analysis of Multiple Fragments", 생성문법연구, 27(1), pp.197~220 (2017), 한국생성문법학회
- 안희돈, "On Caseless Fragments and Some Implications", 어학연구, 53(2), pp.247~286 (2017), 언어교육원
- An, Duk-Ho, "Clauses in noncanonical positions at the syntax-phonology interface", Syntax, 10, pp.38~79 (2007)
- An, Duk-Ho, "Syntax at the PF interface: Prosodic mapping, linear order, and deletion", Ph.D., pp.2007
- An, Duk-Ho, "Genitive case in Korean and its implications for noun phrase structure", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 23, pp.361~392 (2014)
- An, Duk-Ho, "Extra deletion in fragment answers and its implication", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 25, pp.313~350 (2016)
- An, Duk-Ho, "A way to avoid islands in fragment answers in Korean", Proceedings of WAFL 13 (2017)
- Baker, Mark, "Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing" (1988), University of Chicago Press
- Barton, Ellen, "Nonsentential constituents" (1990), John Benjamins
- Barton, Ellen, "Views on phrase structure", pp.193~214 (1991), Kluwer
- Barton, Ellen, "The grammar of telegraphic structures : sentential and nonsentential derivation", Journal of English Linguistics, 26, pp.37~67 (1998)
- Barton, Ellen, "Ellipsis and nonsentential speech", pp.71~93 (2005), Springer
- Bošković, Željko, "Now I’m a phase, now I’m not a phase: On the variability of phases with extraction and ellipsis", Linguistic Inquiry, 45, pp.27~89 (2014)
- Bošković, Željko, "The companion to syntax", Wiley-Blackwell
- Choi, Youngju, "Fragments with or without articulated constituents at LF", NELS, 29, pp.177~188 (2009)
- Chomsky, Noam, "Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky, Noam, "Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- 정대호, "On the Descrepancy between Fronted Predicates vs. Fragmented Predicates", 현대문법연구, (50), pp.1~26 (2007), 현대문법학회
- Chung, Sandra, "Sluicing and the lexicon: The point of no return", Proceedings of the thirty-first annual meeting of the Berkely Linguistics Society, pp.73~91 (2005), Department of Linguistics, UC Berkeley
- Chung, Sandra, "Sluicing and logical form", Natural Language Semantics, 3, pp.239~282 (1995)
- Chung, Sandra, "Representing language: Essays in honor of Judith Aissen", pp.31~50 (2011), California Digital Library eScholarship Repository. Linguistic Research Center, University of California, Santa Cruz
- Culicover, Peter W., "Simpler syntax" (2005), Oxford University Press
- Craenenbroeck, Jeroen Van, "Ellipsis, identity, and accommodation", Ms., pp.2012
- Emonds, Joseph., "A unified theory of syntactic categories" (1985), Foris
- Den Dikken, Marcel, "Relators and linkers: The syntax of predication, predicate inversion and copulas" (2006), MIT Press
- Fortin, Cati, "Some (not all) nonsetentials are only a phase", Lingua, 117, pp.67~94 (2007)
- Fukaya, Teruhiko, "Sluicing and stripping in Japanese and some implications", Ph.D., pp.2007
- Fukuya, Teruhiko, "Stripping and sluicing in Japanese and some implications", WCCFL, 18, pp.145~158 (1999)
- Jackendoff, Ray, "Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution" (2002), Oxford University Press
- Jeong, Yongkil, "Comp -ko and case markers", Studies in Generative Grammar, 9, pp.39~87 (1999)
- 하승완, "An Evasion Analysis of Korean Sluicing", 생성문법연구, 27(1), pp.61~80 (2017), 한국생성문법학회
- Han, Chung-hye, "Are there double relative clauses in Korean?", Linguistic Inquiry, 35, pp.315~337 (2004)
- Hankamer, Jorge, "Deletion in coordinate structures" (1979), Garland Press
- "Studies in Generative Grammar", 1994, 1~43
- Huang, C.-T. James, "Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar", Ph.D., pp.1982
- Hornstein, Norbert, "Understanding minimalism" (2005), Cambridge University Press
- Johnson, Kyle, "The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory", pp.439~479 (2001)
- 김광섭, "생략접사", 생성문법연구, 15(3), pp.275~292 (2005), 한국생성문법학회
- 김랑혜윤, "Some Arguments for the In-Situ Remnants", 생성문법연구, 27(3), pp.535~564 (2017), 한국생성문법학회
- 김선웅, "A Predicate Inversion Analysis of Kukes in Korean “Sluicing”", 언어연구, 29(1), pp.217~233 (2012), 언어정보연구소
- 고희정, "Remarks on Right Dislocation Construction in Korean: Challenges to bi-clausal analyses", 어학연구, 50(2), pp.275~310 (2014), 언어교육원
- 고희정, "Gapless Right-Dislocation: The Role of Overt Correlates", 어학연구, 52(1), pp.3~32 (2016), 언어교육원
- Lappin, Shalom, "Handbook of contemporary semantic theory", pp.145~175 (1996), Blackwell
- 이정훈, "韓國語 後補充 構文의 構造", 어문연구(語文硏究), 37(2), pp.31~54 (2009), 한국어문교육연구회
- 이정식, "국어 우전위 요소와 조각구", 생성문법연구, 26(2), pp.115~141 (2016), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Ludlow, Peter, "Ellipsis and non-sentential speech", pp.95~108 (2005), Springer
- Merchant, Jason, "The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis" (2001), Oxford University Press
- Merchant, Jason, "Fragments and ellipsis", Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, pp.661~738 (2004)
- Mikkelsen, Line, "Copula clause: Specification, predication, and equation" (2005), John Benjamins
- Morgan, Jerry, "Issues in linguistics", pp.719~751 (1973), University of Illinois Press
- Morgan, Jerry, "Sentence fragments revisited", CLS, 25, pp.228~241 (1989)
- Park, Bum-Sik, "Locality and identity in ellipsis", Ph.D., pp.2005
- Park, Bum-Sik, "Island-insensitive fragment answers in Korean", Proceedings of the 24th west coast conference on formal linguistics, pp.317~325 (2005), Cascadilla
- 박범식, "Multiple fragment answers in Korean", 언어연구, 30(3), pp.453~472 (2013), 언어정보연구소
- 박범식, "Ways of Deriving Bare Fragments: Case-stranding and Postposition-stranding under Ellipsis", 생성문법연구, 25(4), pp.825~849 (2015), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Park, Bum-Sik, "Rescuing broken dependency in Korean fragments", Paper presented at the 89th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America (2015)
- 박범식, "Left Branch Extraction in Multiple Fragments and Its Implications for Island Violations in Korean", 언어, 41(1), pp.1~19 (2016), 한국언어학회[DOI]
- 박명관, "Pre", postposition Stranding under Sluicing and the Identity Condition on Ellipsis, 2014, pp.(78), 1~19[DOI]
- Pesetsky, David, "The representation of (in)definiteness" (1987), MIT Press
- Pesetsky, David, "Phrasal movement and its kin" (2000), MIT Press
- Ross, John, "Constraints on variables in syntax", Ph.D., pp.1967
- Sag, Ivan, "Deletion and logical form" (1979), Garland Press
- Sailor, Craig, "Tagged for deletion: a typological approach to VP ellipsis in tag questions", M.A., pp.2011
- "Studies in Generative Grammar", 2000, 267~294
- Stainton, Robert, "Non-sentential assertions and semantic ellipsis", Linguistics and Philosophy, 18, pp.281~296 (1995)
- Stainton, Robert, "Utterance meaning and syntactic ellipsis", Pragmatics and Cognition, 5, pp.51~78 (1997)
- Stainton, Robert, "Quantifier phrases, meaningfulness ‘n isolation’ and ellipsis", Linguistics and Philosophy, 18, pp.281~296 (1998)
- Stainton, Robert, "Semantics vs. pragmatics", pp.383~457 (2005), Oxford University Press
- Stainton, Robert, "Words and thoughts: Subsentences, ellipsis, and the philosophy of language" (2006), Oxford University Press
- Tancredi, Christopher, "Deletion, deaccenting and presupposition", Ph.D., pp.1992
- Vicente, Luis, "Syntactic isomorphism and non-isomorphism under ellipsis", Ms., pp.2008
- 위혜경, "Three Types of Fragment", 생성문법연구, 24(1), pp.255~280 (2014), 한국생성문법학회
- Yoon, Junghyoe, "Case drop in Korean - Its empirical and theoretical investigation", Ph.D., pp.2012
- 윤정회, "Bare Fragment Answers as Elliptical Pseudoclefts", 생성문법연구, 24(2), pp.365~384 (2014), 한국생성문법학회