본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Bound Noun tung in Korean

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper discusses the syntax of a bound noun tung in Korean. Choi (2018) and Park (2019, 2020) have recently examined the semantic and pragmatic use of the bound noun tung. The bound noun has two different (or even opposite) meanings (Choi 2018, Park 2019; 2020)-it can refer to the listed entities before the bound noun tung in a sentence or include similar entities that are not mentioned in a sentence. Also, the bound noun tung can be followed by a noun that interprets or generalizes the listed entities (Park 2019, 2020). Basically, I assume that the meaning of the bound noun tung is a pro-form following Choi (2018) and Park (2019, 2020). I provide the syntactic argument that the bound noun tung merges in small n. I further assume that it is affixal and thus attracts a N head into small n which is in line with other bound nouns in Korean (Kim 2017a, 2017b, 2017c). It is also argued that the noun that provides the interpretation/generalization is an appositive of the phrases headed by the bound noun tung and merges in D following Radford (2004).

Abstract

This paper discusses the syntax of a bound noun tung in Korean. Choi (2018) and Park (2019, 2020) have recently examined the semantic and pragmatic use of the bound noun tung. The bound noun has two different (or even opposite) meanings (Choi 2018, Park 2019; 2020)-it can refer to the listed entities before the bound noun tung in a sentence or include similar entities that are not mentioned in a sentence. Also, the bound noun tung can be followed by a noun that interprets or generalizes the listed entities (Park 2019, 2020). Basically, I assume that the meaning of the bound noun tung is a pro-form following Choi (2018) and Park (2019, 2020). I provide the syntactic argument that the bound noun tung merges in small n. I further assume that it is affixal and thus attracts a N head into small n which is in line with other bound nouns in Korean (Kim 2017a, 2017b, 2017c). It is also argued that the noun that provides the interpretation/generalization is an appositive of the phrases headed by the bound noun tung and merges in D following Radford (2004).

참고문헌 (14)

  1. Bae, Sun-Hee, "NP languages do not have NP-Ellipsis: examination of Korean and Japanese", Ms, pp.2012
  2. Choi, Youn, "Hankwuke pokswuphyohyen 'tul'ey tayhan kochal - uyconmyengsa 'tul'ul cwungsimulo - (A study on Korean plural particle “deul” - with focus on a bound noun “deul” -)", emwunyenkwu, 46(4), pp.91~117 (2018)
  3. Kim, Tae Sik, "Small Projections and Grammaticalization in Korean", Doctor, pp.2011
  4. Kim, Tae Sik, "Bound nouns, ellipsis or pro-form?", Studies in Generative Grammar, 26(1), pp.1~14 (2016)
  5. Kim, Tae Sik, "Bound noun man in Korean", Studies in Generative Grammar, 27(1), pp.81~105 (2017)
  6. Kim, Tae Sik, "Bound noun tongan in Korean", Studies in Generative Grammar, 27(2), pp.367~394 (2017)
  7. Kim, Tae Sik, "The relationship between semantic bleaching and syntax: a case from bound noun cwung in Korean", Studies in Generative Grammar, 27(3), pp.565~589 (2017)
  8. Kim, Tae Sik, "Bound Noun Pa in Korean", Studies in Modern Grammar, 120, pp.27~49 (2023)
  9. Park, Hye-Jin, "kwuke hakswultheyksuthuey sayongtoyn uycon myengsa ‘tung(等)’ kwumwuney tayhan yenkwu-heyci(hedge) phyohyenuloseuy uymikinungey cwumokhaye-. (A Study on the Syntax of Dependent nouns ‘Deung’ used in Korean Academic Text -by focusing on the semantic function as a hedge-)", Korean Semantics, 65, pp.109~133 (2019)
  10. Park, Hye-Jin, "sinmwun kisaey sayongtoyn uycon myengsa tung(等) kwumwunuy uymikinungey tayhan yenkwu (A Study on the Syntax of Dependent nouns ‘Deung’ used in newspaper articles)", Korean Semantics, 69, pp.283~314 (2020)
  11. Radford, Andrew, "Minimalist Syntax, Exploring the structure of English" (2004), Cambridge University Press
  12. Rizzi, Luigi, "Relativized minimality" (1990), The MIT Press
  13. Roberts, Ian, "Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  14. van Gelderen, Elly, "Grammaticalization as Economy" (2004), John Benjamins

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (2건)