목적어 자리 ‘을/를’, ‘은/는’, 무표지 ‘Ø’의 대립적 특성 분석
An Analysis of the Contrastive Functions of ul/lul, un/nun and Null marker ‘Ø’
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this research is to study the contrastive characteristics of postpositions ul/lul, un/nun, and null maker ‘Ø’ in the place of object NPs. These three postpositions are different in the part of sentence that contains recognizable sisters. A speaker recognizes not only a part of sentence, but also its recognizable sisters outside the range of what is expressed in a sentence. Ul/lul has recognizable sisters of object and chooses an expressed object among them. Un/nun used in the place of object contains recognizable sisters of predicate. Omitting these particles, the sentence does not possess recognizable sisters of either object or predicate. Such basic characteristics is closely related to the function discussed in the original research on these three postpositions. The fact that ul/lul contains recognizable sisters of object is associated with that this postposition acts as objective case marking. The fact that un/nun possesses recognizable sisters of predicate is related to that this postposition, depending on the flow of a sentence, represents the contrastive meaning. And, the fact that null maker ‘Ø’ does not have any recognizable sister is tied to that any attention or focus is not given to the object.
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to study the contrastive characteristics of postpositions ul/lul, un/nun, and null maker ‘Ø’ in the place of object NPs. These three postpositions are different in the part of sentence that contains recognizable sisters. A speaker recognizes not only a part of sentence, but also its recognizable sisters outside the range of what is expressed in a sentence. Ul/lul has recognizable sisters of object and chooses an expressed object among them. Un/nun used in the place of object contains recognizable sisters of predicate. Omitting these particles, the sentence does not possess recognizable sisters of either object or predicate. Such basic characteristics is closely related to the function discussed in the original research on these three postpositions. The fact that ul/lul contains recognizable sisters of object is associated with that this postposition acts as objective case marking. The fact that un/nun possesses recognizable sisters of predicate is related to that this postposition, depending on the flow of a sentence, represents the contrastive meaning. And, the fact that null maker ‘Ø’ does not have any recognizable sister is tied to that any attention or focus is not given to the object.
참고문헌 (23)
- 고석주, "한국어 조사의 연구 : '-가'와 '-를'을 중심으로", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2001
- 고석주, "현대 한국어 조사의 연구Ⅰ- ‘격 개념’과 조사 ‘-가’와 ‘-를’을 중심으로" (2004), 한국문화사
- 김귀화, "국어의 격 연구" (1988), 한국문화사
- 김미형, "조사 ‘이", 가’와 ‘은, 담화와 인지, pp.2011, 18(3)[DOI]
- 김재욱, "격조사의 기능에 관한 인지의미론적 연구", 박사, pp.2000
- 김태호, "The use and non-use of the subject and object markers ka and lul in conversational Korean", 언어학, 17(4), pp.55~78 (2009), 대한언어학회
- 김형주, "텔레비전 시사토론 대화의 구조와 전략", 박사, pp.2010
- 류구상, "조사 {를}에 대한 연구", 국어국문학, 102, pp.117~138 (1989)
- 서정수, "국어문법연구" (1992), 한국문화사
- 宣友容, "국어조사 ‘이", 가’, ‘을, 석사, pp.서울大學校 大學院[DOI]
- 신현숙, "목적격 표지", -를, 언어, pp.1982, 7(1)[DOI]
- 신현숙, "한국어 현상-의미 분석" (1991), 상명대학교 출판부
- 를’ 연구, "국어 격 조사 ‘을", pp.1988, 이광호
- 이선희, "조사 {-를}의 의미와 그 문법적 실현", 박사
- 이정민, "언어학사전" (1982), 한신문화사
- 이정택, "조사 ‘를’의 의미, In 이용주박사 회갑기념논문집", pp.492~516 (1989), 한샘
- 이한정, "Contrastive Focus, Usage Probability and Gradients in Korean Case Ellipsis", 담화와 인지, 18(3), pp.219~244 (2011), 담화·인지언어학회
- 임홍빈, "{을", 를} 조사의 의미와 통사, 1979, pp.2, 91~130[DOI]
- 채완, "조사 ‘는’의 의미", 국어학, 4, pp.93~113 (1976), 국어학회
- 시정곤, "국어의 격과 조사" (1999), 월인
- 홍기선, "한국어 대격의 의미", 언어, 19(1), pp.287~311 (1994)
- Kim, Taeho, "Subject and object markings in conversational Korean", 박사, pp.2008
- Lee, Hanjung, "Explaining variation in Korean case ellipsis: economy versus iconicity", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 19, pp.291~318 (2010)