본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Host’s Receipt Work in Korean Talk-Show Interactions: Managing Norms through Categorization Work

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper examines host-guest interactions in Korean talk shows with special reference to how the host’s receipt work addressing the guest’s response is organized. Using conversation analysis (CA) and membership categorization analysis (MCA), it analyzes the sequential development in which the host formulates or re-presents the guest’s answer by proposing a version of reality alternative to the one proposed by the guest. This formulation process is shown to be organized by category-transformative work obliquely performed by the host as a way of grounding the subsequent interactions on the host’s own terms and agendas. The normative character of the host’s formulation practice is noted, which furnishes the host with the basis for engaging in an array of morally-implicative face/identity work vis-à-vis the guest. With the import of soliciting or mobilizing the TV-viewing audiences’s co-alignment, various features of the host’s categorization work displayed in this process embody the host’s orientation to his/her role as the gatekeeper of information and cultural mediator who closely and omnirelevantly attends to regulating norms and establishing the terms of interaction as verbally hygienic, normatively solid, and morally safe.

Abstract

This paper examines host-guest interactions in Korean talk shows with special reference to how the host’s receipt work addressing the guest’s response is organized. Using conversation analysis (CA) and membership categorization analysis (MCA), it analyzes the sequential development in which the host formulates or re-presents the guest’s answer by proposing a version of reality alternative to the one proposed by the guest. This formulation process is shown to be organized by category-transformative work obliquely performed by the host as a way of grounding the subsequent interactions on the host’s own terms and agendas. The normative character of the host’s formulation practice is noted, which furnishes the host with the basis for engaging in an array of morally-implicative face/identity work vis-à-vis the guest. With the import of soliciting or mobilizing the TV-viewing audiences’s co-alignment, various features of the host’s categorization work displayed in this process embody the host’s orientation to his/her role as the gatekeeper of information and cultural mediator who closely and omnirelevantly attends to regulating norms and establishing the terms of interaction as verbally hygienic, normatively solid, and morally safe.

참고문헌 (53)

  1. Besnier, Niko, "Information withholding as a manipulative and collusive strategy in Nukulaelae gossip", Language in Society, 18, pp.315~341 (1989)
  2. Cameron, Deborah, "Verbal hygiene" (1995), Routledge
  3. Drew, Paul, "Studies in language and social interaction: In honor of Robert Hopper", pp.293~308 (2002), Lawrence Erbaum Associates
  4. Fairclough, Norman, "Approaches to media discourse", pp.142~162 (1998), Blackwell
  5. Fetzer, Anita, "Political discourse and mediated and public discourse", Journal of Pragmatics, 38, pp.143~153 (2006)
  6. Richard Fitzgerald, "Categories, norms and inferences: Generating entertainment in a daytime talk show", Discourse, Context & Media, 1(4), pp.151~159 (2012), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  7. Fitzgerald, Richard, "Advances in membership categorization analysis" (2015), Sage
  8. Fitzgerald, Richard, "Omnirelevance and interactional context", Australian Journal of Communication, 36(3), pp.45~64 (2009)
  9. Garfinkel, Harold, "Studies in ethnomethodology" (1967), Prentice Hall
  10. Garfinkel, Harold, "Theoretical sociology", pp.338~366 (1970), Appleton Century Crofts
  11. Goffman, Erving, "Forms of talk" (1981), Basil Blackwell
  12. Heritage, John, "Garfinkel and ethnomethodology" (1984), Polity Press
  13. Heritage, John, "Handbook of discourse analysis, volume 3: Discourse and dialogue", pp.95~117 (1985), Academic Press
  14. Heritage, John, "Action formation and its epistemic (and other) backgrounds", Discourse Studies, 15(5), pp.551~578 (2013)
  15. Heritage, John, "Talk in action: Interactions, identities, and institutions" (2010), Wiley-Blackwell
  16. Heritage, John, "The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-Interaction", Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), pp.15~38 (2005)
  17. Heritage, John, "Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology", pp.123~162 (1979), Irvington
  18. Heritage, John, "Aspects of the properties of formulations in natural conversations: Some instances analysed", Semiotica, 30(3, pp.4) (1980), 245~262
  19. Hester, Stephen, "Culture in action: Studies in membership categorization analysis" (1997), University Press of America
  20. Hutchby, Ian, "“Active listening”: Formulations and the elicitation of feelings-talk in child counseling", Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(3), pp.303~329 (2005)
  21. Ilie, Cornelia, "Question-response argumentation in talk shows", Journal of Pragmatics, 31(8), pp.975~999 (1999)
  22. Jefferson, Gail, "Talk and social organization", pp.86~100 (1987), Mulilingual Matters
  23. Jefferson, Gail, "On the sequential organization of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation", Social Problems, 35(4), pp.418~442 (1988)
  24. Jefferson, Gail, "Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation", pp.43~59 (2004), John Benjamins
  25. 김규현, "A Conversation Analysis of Korean Sentence-Ending Modal Suffixes -ney, -kwun(a), and -ta: Noticing as a Social action", 사회언어학, 12(1), pp.1~36 (2004), 한국사회언어학회
  26. Kim, Kyu-hyun, "Formulating practices in Korean TV talk shows: The host’s category work as morally-ordered action", Paper presented at the 14th International Pragmatics (IPrA) Conference (2015), University of Antwerp
  27. Lee, Hyo Sang, "Tense, aspect, and modality: A discourse-pragmatic analysis of verbal affixes in Korean from a typological perspective", Ph.D., pp.1991
  28. Kim, Kyu-hyun, "Cognitive constraints on expressing newly perceived information, with reference to epistemic modal suffixes in Korean", Cognitive Linguistics, 4(2), pp.135~167 (1993)
  29. Kim, Kyu-hyun, "A discourse-pragmatic analysis of the committal-ci in Korean", Journal of Pragmatics, 20, pp.327~358 (1999)
  30. Lee, Ji-Eun, "Inyongmwun-uy tayhwapwunsek yenkwu: pangsong tamhwa-eyse nathana-nun hankwuke mokwuke hwaca-uy naylethibu", pinaylethibu inyongmwun-ey sayong-ul cwungsim-elo (A conversation analysis of indirect quotation: The use of narrative, Paper presented at the Discourse and Cognitive Linguistics Society of Korea Workshop, pp.2012[DOI]
  31. Lerner, Gene. H., "Finding “face” in the preference structure of talk-in-interaction", Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(3), pp.303~321 (1996)
  32. Lerner, Gene. H., "On the place of linguistic resources in the organization of talk-in-Interaction: A co-investigation of English and Japanese grammatical practices", Journal of Pragmatics, 31(1), pp.49~75 (1999)
  33. Levinson, Stephen. C., "Pragmatics" (1983), Cambridge University Press
  34. Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, "A rapport and impression management approach to public figures’ performance of talk", Journal of Pragmatics, 37, pp.611~631 (2005)
  35. Newman, Judith, "Why do people tell all on talk shows?", New Woman, pp.216~219 (1992)
  36. Ochs, Elinor, "Rethinking context", pp.335~358 (1993), Cambridge University Press
  37. Penz, von Hermine, "Language and control in American TV talk shows" (1996), Gunter Narr Verlag
  38. Pollner, Melvin, "Mundane reasoning", Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 4, pp.35~54 (1974)
  39. Pomerantz, Anita, "Telling my side: ‘Limited access’ as a fishing device", Sociological Inquiry, 50, pp.186~198 (1980)
  40. Pomerantz, Anita, "Handbook of language and social interaction", pp.149~171 (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum
  41. Sacks, Harvey, "Directions in sociolinguistics", pp.325~345 (1972), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
  42. Sacks, Harvey, "Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis", pp.413~419 (1984), Cambridge University Press
  43. Sacks, Harvey, "Lectures on conversation, volumes 1 & 2" (1992), Blackwell
  44. Sacks, Harvey, "A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation", Language, 50(4), pp.696~735 (1974)
  45. Schegloff, Emanuel A., "Presequences and indirection: Applying speech act theory to ordinary conversation", Journal of Pragmatics, 12, pp.55~62 (1988)
  46. Schegloff, Emanuel A., "Interaction and grammar", pp.70~85 (1996), Cambridge University Press
  47. Schegloff, Emanuel A., "A tutorial on membership categorization", Journal of Pragmatics, 39, pp.462~482 (2006)
  48. Schegloff, Emanuel A., "Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis, volume 1" (2007), Cambridge University Press
  49. Schegloff, Emanuel A., "Categories in action: Person-reference and membership categorization", Discourse Studies, 9(4), pp.433~461 (2007)
  50. Stokoe, Elizabeth, "Moving forward with membership categorization analysis: Methods for systematic analysis", Discourse Studies, 14(3), pp.277~303 (2012)
  51. Tolson, Andrew, "‘Being yourself’: The pursuit of authentic celebrity", Discourse Studies, 3(4), pp.443~457 (2001)
  52. Thornborrow, Joanna, "Narrative, opinion and situated argument in talk show discourse", Journal of Pragmatic, 39, pp.1436~1453 (2007)
  53. Wilkinson, Sue, "Surprise as an interactional achievement : Reaction tokens in conversation", Social Psychology Quarterly, 69(2), pp.150~182 (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)