본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

인터뷰 대화에서 나타나는 관계범주 조정에 기반을 둔 칭찬전략 연구

Complimentary strategies through relationship category adjustment in interview talk

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This study attempts to show how entertainment-oriented talk-show interactions between the host and the guest are organized as a type of semi-institutional talk, which exhibits the characteristics of both ordinary conversation and institutional talk in terms of many aspects of its discursive configuration. The purpose of this study is to address the participants’ complementary work based on their mutual knowledge about membership category. The conversational data examined here are excerpted from ‘Talk Asia’ of CNN, in which the host interviews a single guest with celebrity or expert status, addressing various topics concerning the guest’s personal life, career, or relationship with others. Within a conversational analytic framework, this study analyzes that, when the host questions about the guest’s relationship member who has not participated in this show, creating complimentary context, the guest usually uses category transformation or category comparison strategies and maximizes compliment for the relationship category in their own way. In other words, this study indicates that the participants in interview talk perform the categorization work such as transformation or comparison as a resource for organizing complimentary discursive action.

Abstract

This study attempts to show how entertainment-oriented talk-show interactions between the host and the guest are organized as a type of semi-institutional talk, which exhibits the characteristics of both ordinary conversation and institutional talk in terms of many aspects of its discursive configuration. The purpose of this study is to address the participants’ complementary work based on their mutual knowledge about membership category. The conversational data examined here are excerpted from ‘Talk Asia’ of CNN, in which the host interviews a single guest with celebrity or expert status, addressing various topics concerning the guest’s personal life, career, or relationship with others. Within a conversational analytic framework, this study analyzes that, when the host questions about the guest’s relationship member who has not participated in this show, creating complimentary context, the guest usually uses category transformation or category comparison strategies and maximizes compliment for the relationship category in their own way. In other words, this study indicates that the participants in interview talk perform the categorization work such as transformation or comparison as a resource for organizing complimentary discursive action.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. Atkinson, J. Maxwell, "Order in court: The organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings" (1979), Macmillan
  2. Clayman, Steven, E., "Generating news: The interactional organisation of news interviews", PhD, Department of Sociology, pp.1987
  3. Clayman, Steven, E., "Sequence and solidarity. Advances in group processes: Group cohesion, trust, and solidarity", pp.229~253 (2002), Elsevier Science
  4. Clayman, Steven, "The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  5. Drew, Paul, "‘Open’ class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation", Journal of Pragmatics, 28(1), pp.69~101 (1997)
  6. Greatbatch, David, "Aspects of topical organization in news interviews : The use of agenda-shifting procedures by interviewees", Media Culture & Society, 8(4), pp.441~455 (1986)
  7. Greatbatch, David, "A turn-taking system for British news interviews", Language in Society, 17(3), pp.401~430 (1988)
  8. Heritage, John., "Garfinkel and ethnomethodology" (1984), Polity Press
  9. Heritage, John, "Oh-prefaced responses to inquiry", Language in Society, 27(3), pp.291~334 (1998)
  10. Heritage, John., "Questioning in medicine. ‘Why do you ask?’: The function of questions in institutional discourse", pp.42~68 (2010), Oxford University Press
  11. Heritage, John, "Epistemics in action : Action formation and territories of knowledge", Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), pp.1~29 (2012)
  12. Heritage, John, "Well-prefaced turns in English conversation : A conversation analytic perspective", Journal of Pragmatics, 88, pp.88~104 (2015)
  13. Heritage, Joh, "Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis", pp.93~137 (1991), University of California Press
  14. Heritage, John, "Grammar and Institution : Questions and questioning in the broadcast news interview", Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(1), pp.1~60 (1995)
  15. Hutchby, Ian., "Confrontation talk: Arguments, asymmetries, and power on talk radio" (1996), Lawrence Erlbaum
  16. Ilie, Cornelia, "Question-response argumentation in talk shows", Journal of Pragmatics, 31, pp.975~999 (1999)
  17. Ilie, Cornelia, "Semi-institutional discourse : The case of talk shows", Journal of Pragmatics, 33, pp.209~254 (2001)
  18. Ilie, Cornelia., "Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, vol. 12", pp.489~494 (2006), Elsevier
  19. Jefferson, Gail, "Caveat speaker : Preliminary notes on recipient topic-shift implicature", Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26, pp.1~30 (1993)
  20. Kim, Kyu-hyun., "Word order in discourse", pp.247~296 (1995), John Benjamins
  21. Lee, Seung-hee., "Handbook of conversation analysis", pp.415~432 (2013), Cambridge University Press
  22. Lerner, Gene, "‘Finding face’ in the preference structures of talk-in-interaction", Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, pp.303~321 (1996)
  23. Lerner, Gene., "Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation", pp.225~256 (2004), John Benjamins
  24. Mandelbaum, Jenny, "Couples sharing stories", Communication Quarterly, 35(2), pp.144~170 (1987)
  25. McHoul, Alec, "The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom", Language in Society, 7, pp.183~213 (1978)
  26. disagreements, "Second assessments: A study of some features of agreements", pp.1975, Pomerantz, Anita, M.
  27. Pomerantz, Anita, M., "Studies in the organization of conversational interaction", pp.79~112 (1978), Academic Press
  28. Pomerantz, Anita, M., "Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis", pp.57~101 (1984), Cambridge University Press
  29. Pomerantz, Anita, M., "Pursuing a response. Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis", pp.152~163 (1984), Cambridge University Press
  30. Pomerantz, Anita M., "Preference. Handbook of conversation analysis", pp.210~228 (2013), Cambridge University Press
  31. Robinson, Jeffrey D, "The Sequential Organization of “Explicit” Apologies in Naturally Occurring English’", Research on Language and Social Interaction, 37(3), pp.291~330 (2004)
  32. Sacks, Harvey., "Talk and social organisation", pp.54~69 (1987), Multilingual Matters
  33. Sacks, Harvey., "Lectures on conversation, Volumes 1 & 2" (1992), Blackwell
  34. Sacks, Harvey, "A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation", Language, 50(4), pp.696~735 (1974)
  35. Schegloff, Emanuel A., "Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis" (2007), Cambridge University Press
  36. Tolson, Andrew., "Television talk shows: Discourse, performance, spectacle" (2001), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)