그림-문장 검증 과제에 나타난 한국어 격조사의 의미ㆍ통사적 처리의 차이
Differences in the semantic and syntactic processing of Korean case markers in the picture-sentence verification task
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study investigates the semantic and syntactic processing of case markers in Korean sentence processing, reexamining two leading theories: Modular Theory (Fodor 1983) and Interactive Theory (Bates & MacWhinney 1987). The former proposes that semantic processing is independent from syntactic processing,whereas they are interacting each other simultaneously in the latter. The accuracy and response time of the judgment by native speakers of Korean were measured in a picture-sentence verification task where the participants judged whether a set of pictures and the aurally presented corresponding sentences matched each other. Control sentences were compared with corresponding sentences in a semantically unmatched condition and a syntactically ill-formed (thereby unmatched) condition. Also, in each condition,subject dropped sentences were compared with object dropped sentences. The results from 40 participants revealed (i) that syntactically ill-formed sentences were processed more accurately and rapidly than semantically unmatched sentences as well as control sentences, (ii) that semantically unmatched sentences were processed more slowly than semantically matched sentences in object dropped sentences, but no such differences were found in subject dropped sentences, and (iii) that subject dropped sentences were processed as rapidly as object dropped sentences in matched conditions, but object dropped sentences were processed more rapidly than subject dropped sentences in unmatched conditions. The findings were interpreted to indicate independent processing levels for semantic and syntactic processing, which conforms to the predictions of Modular Theory, not to the Interactive Theory.
Abstract
This study investigates the semantic and syntactic processing of case markers in Korean sentence processing, reexamining two leading theories: Modular Theory (Fodor 1983) and Interactive Theory (Bates & MacWhinney 1987). The former proposes that semantic processing is independent from syntactic processing,whereas they are interacting each other simultaneously in the latter. The accuracy and response time of the judgment by native speakers of Korean were measured in a picture-sentence verification task where the participants judged whether a set of pictures and the aurally presented corresponding sentences matched each other. Control sentences were compared with corresponding sentences in a semantically unmatched condition and a syntactically ill-formed (thereby unmatched) condition. Also, in each condition,subject dropped sentences were compared with object dropped sentences. The results from 40 participants revealed (i) that syntactically ill-formed sentences were processed more accurately and rapidly than semantically unmatched sentences as well as control sentences, (ii) that semantically unmatched sentences were processed more slowly than semantically matched sentences in object dropped sentences, but no such differences were found in subject dropped sentences, and (iii) that subject dropped sentences were processed as rapidly as object dropped sentences in matched conditions, but object dropped sentences were processed more rapidly than subject dropped sentences in unmatched conditions. The findings were interpreted to indicate independent processing levels for semantic and syntactic processing, which conforms to the predictions of Modular Theory, not to the Interactive Theory.
참고문헌 (18)
- 김기혁, "언어유형론(언어의 통일성과 다양성)" (2010), 소통
- 정진희, "제2언어로서의 한국어 영주어와 영목적어 습득 연구", 석사, pp.2011
- Bloom, Paul, "Subjectless sentences in child language", Linguistic Inquiry, 21, pp.491~504 (1990)
- Bates, Elizabeth, "Competition, variation, and language learning, In Mechanisms of language acquisition", pp.157~193 (1987), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- Carpenter, Patricia A, "Sentence comprehension: a psycholinguistic processing model of verification", Psychological Review, 82(1), pp.45~73 (1975)
- Fodor, Janet. D, "Modularity of mind" (1983), MIT Press
- Forster, Ken. I, "Levels of processing and the structure of the language processor, In Sentence processing" (1979), Erlbaum Press
- Frazier, Lyn, "The sausage machine: a new two stage parsing model", Cognition, 6, pp.291~326 (1978)
- Gough, Philip, B, "Grammatical transformations and speed of understanding", Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 4, pp.107~111 (1965)
- Haegeman, Liliane, "Introduction to Government and Binding Theory" (1991), Blackwell
- Just, Marcel, A, "Comprehension of negation with quantification", Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, pp.244~253 (1971)
- Kim, Youngjin, "The effects of case marking information on Korean sentence processing", Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, pp.687~714 (1999)
- Knoeferle, Pia, "Comprehending how visual context influences incremental sentence processing: insights from ERPs and picture-sentence verification", Psychophysiology, 48, pp.495~506 (2011)
- MacDonald, Maryellen. C, "The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution", Psychological Review, 101, pp.676~703 (1994)
- MacWhinney, Brian, "The cross-linguistic study of sentence processing" (1989), Cambridge University Press
- Mueller, Jutta L, "ERP evidence for different strategies in the processing of case markers in native speakers and non-native learners", BMC Neuroscience, 8(18) (2007)[DOI]
- Vincenzi, Marica De, "Differences in the perception and time course of syntactic and semantic violations", Brain and Language, 85, pp.280~296 (2003)
- Yamashita, Hiroko, "The Effects of Word-Order and Case Marking Information on the Processing of Japanese", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26(2), pp.163~188 (1997)