본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

Semantic Effects of a Pre-verbal Argument on the Online Processing of Korean Sentences: An Eye-tracking Study

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The goal of this study was to examine the role of the lexical semantic information of pre-verbal arguments in the online processing of sentences. More specifically, it was examined whether the semantic information of the subject can predictively restrict the semantic domain of the upcoming argument even before the verb is introduced into the string. Given that the speakers of SOV languages can produce and process verb-final sentences without any difficulties, other information than that from a verb should be involved in the sentence processing so that the speakers do not have to wait until the end of a clause. In our eye-tracking experiment, 38 participants showed anticipatory eye-movements to the picture of the direct object (e.g., food) as soon as hearing a semantically related subject (e.g., cook), but did not when the subject (e.g., Yenghi) was semantically neutral to the object. These results confirm the predictive mechanism of the parsing system and the semantic effect of a pre-verbal argument: that is, using the semantic information of a pre-verbal argument which is available early in the input, the parser can rapidly limit the semantic type of the following argument. In this way, a verb-final language can be processed immediately and incrementally.

Abstract

The goal of this study was to examine the role of the lexical semantic information of pre-verbal arguments in the online processing of sentences. More specifically, it was examined whether the semantic information of the subject can predictively restrict the semantic domain of the upcoming argument even before the verb is introduced into the string. Given that the speakers of SOV languages can produce and process verb-final sentences without any difficulties, other information than that from a verb should be involved in the sentence processing so that the speakers do not have to wait until the end of a clause. In our eye-tracking experiment, 38 participants showed anticipatory eye-movements to the picture of the direct object (e.g., food) as soon as hearing a semantically related subject (e.g., cook), but did not when the subject (e.g., Yenghi) was semantically neutral to the object. These results confirm the predictive mechanism of the parsing system and the semantic effect of a pre-verbal argument: that is, using the semantic information of a pre-verbal argument which is available early in the input, the parser can rapidly limit the semantic type of the following argument. In this way, a verb-final language can be processed immediately and incrementally.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. Altmann, G. T. M., "Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference", Cognition, 73, pp.247~264 (1999)
  2. Altmann, G. T. M., "Interaction with context during human sentence processing", Cognition, 30, pp.191~238 (1988)
  3. Bader, M., "German verb-final clauses and sentence processing: evidence for immediate attachment, In Perspectives on sentence processing" (1994), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  4. Chambers, C. G., "Actions and affordances in syntactic ambiguity resolution", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(3), pp.687~696 (2004)
  5. Crain, S., "On not being led up the garden path: The use of context by the psychological parser, In Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives", pp.320~357 (1985), Cambridge University Press
  6. Frazier, L, "Sentence processing: A tutorial review, In Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading", pp.305~330 (1987), Elsevier Science
  7. Frazier, L., "The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model", Cognition, 6, pp.291~325 (1978)
  8. Frazier, L., "Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: eye-movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences", Cognitive Psychology, 14, pp.178~210 (1982)
  9. Hare, M., "The wind chilled the spectators, but the wine just chilled: Sense, structure, and sentence comprehension", Cognitive Science, 33, pp.610~628 (2009)
  10. Kamide, Y., "Anticipatory processes in sentence processing", Language and Linguistics Compass, 2(4), pp.647~670 (2008)
  11. Kamide, Y., "Incremental pre-head attachment in Japanese parsing", Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, pp.631~662 (1999)
  12. Kamide, Y., "The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye-movements", Journal of Memory and Language, 49, pp.133~156 (2003)
  13. Kim, Y., "Korean Syntactic and Thematic", Referential Processes: Roles of case markers, 1996, pp.8(2), 207~235
  14. 김영진, "안구운동 추적을 통한 한국어 중의성 해소과정 연구", 인지과학, 15(4), pp.49~59 (2004), 한국인지과학회
  15. Knoeferle, P., "The coordinated interplay of scene, utterance, and world knowledge: evidence from eye tracking", Cognitive Science, 30(3), pp.481~529 (2006)
  16. Koh, S., "The resolution of the dative NP ambiguity in Korean", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, pp.265~273 (1997)
  17. Kwon, N, "Processing of syntactic and anaphoric gap-filler dependencies in Korean: Evidence from self-paced reading time, ERP and eye-tracking experiments", 박사, pp.2008
  18. Kwon, N., "Last resort gap strategy in processing long-distance dependencies", Paper presented at The 19th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing (2006)
  19. 이미선, "안구이동추적을 통해 살펴본 관계절의 통사처리 과정", 인지과학, 20(4), pp.507~533 (2009), 한국인지과학회
  20. Lin, Chien-Jer C., "Grammar and parsing: A typological investigation of relative-clause processing", 박사, pp.2006
  21. MacDonald, M., "Lexical Nature of Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution", Psychological Review, 4, pp.676~703 (1994)
  22. McRae, K., "People use their knowledge of common events to understand language, and do so as quickly as possible", Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(6), pp.1417~1429 (2009)
  23. McRae, K., "A basis for generating expectancies for verbs from nouns", Memory & Cognition, 33(7), pp.1174~1184 (2005)
  24. Mitchell, D. C., "Statistical versus linguistic determinants of parsing bias: Cross-linguistic evidence", Paper presented at the 5th Annual CUNY Conference on Sentence Processing (1992)
  25. Miyamoto, E. T., "Case Markers as Clause Boundary Inducers in Japanese", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(4), pp.307~347 (2002)
  26. Miyamoto, E. T., "Filler-gap dependencies in the processing of scrambling in Japanese", Language and Linguistics, 5, pp.153~166 (2004)
  27. Novick, J. M., "Studying the Grammatical Aspects of Word Recognition: Lexical Priming, Parsing, and Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(1), pp.57~75 (2003)
  28. Rayner, K., "The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing", Journal of verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, pp.358~374 (1983)
  29. Spivey, M. J., "Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, pp.1521~1543 (1998)
  30. Tanenhaus , M. K., "Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension", Science, 268, pp.1632~1634 (1995)
  31. Taraban, R., "Parsing and Comprehension. A multiple constraint view, In Comprehension processes in reading" (1990), Erlbaum
  32. Trueswell, J. C., "Toward a lexicalist framework for constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution, In Perspectives on sentence processing" (1994), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  33. Trueswell, J. C., "Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution", Journal of Memory and Language, 33, pp.285~318 (1994)
  34. Trueswell, J. C., "Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, pp.528~553 (1993)
  35. Van Berkum, J. J. A., "Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(3), pp.443~467 (2005)
  36. Van Berkum, J. J. A., "When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect", Cognitive Brain Research, 17(3), pp.701~718 (2003)
  37. Van Gompel, R. P. G., "Syntactic parsing, In The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics", pp.289~307 (2007), Oxford University Press
  38. Vissers, C. T. W. M., "Monitoring in language perception: The effect of misspellings of words in highly constrained sentences", Brain Research, 1106(1), pp.150~163 (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)