본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

“Say Something”: Korean University Students’ English Requests in Computer Chatting

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The present study explores South Korean university students’requesting behavior in cross-cultural interaction via computer. A total of 296natural request tokens were collected from 180 Internet chatting sessionsbetween South Korean and Japanese university students. The focus of the dataanalysis was on South Korean students’ choice of request strategy types andtheir use of mitigating devices. In addition, it examined gender differences intheir requesting behavior. The analysis showed that the Korean universitystudents employed a variety of request strategies, including both direct andindirect, although their preference for mood derivables (i.e., imperatives)appeared stronger than that for other types. With regard to their mitigatingbehavior, the South Korean students predominantly used grounders (i.e.,expressions providing the underlying reasons preceded or followed by arequest token) and politeness markers such as please. Gender differences werefound in the preference for request strategies. Overall, male students favoredmood derivables over the other strategy types to a great degree than didfemale students. However, no gender difference was observed in their use ofmitigation strategy. Discussion on the findings of the study is included.

Abstract

The present study explores South Korean university students’requesting behavior in cross-cultural interaction via computer. A total of 296natural request tokens were collected from 180 Internet chatting sessionsbetween South Korean and Japanese university students. The focus of the dataanalysis was on South Korean students’ choice of request strategy types andtheir use of mitigating devices. In addition, it examined gender differences intheir requesting behavior. The analysis showed that the Korean universitystudents employed a variety of request strategies, including both direct andindirect, although their preference for mood derivables (i.e., imperatives)appeared stronger than that for other types. With regard to their mitigatingbehavior, the South Korean students predominantly used grounders (i.e.,expressions providing the underlying reasons preceded or followed by arequest token) and politeness markers such as please. Gender differences werefound in the preference for request strategies. Overall, male students favoredmood derivables over the other strategy types to a great degree than didfemale students. However, no gender difference was observed in their use ofmitigation strategy. Discussion on the findings of the study is included.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. Beebe, Leslie M., "Speech acts across cultures: Challenge to communication in a second language", pp.65~86 (1996), Mouton de Gruyter
  2. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana., "Learning to say what you mean in a second language : A study of the speech act performance of learners of Hebrew as a second language", Applied Linguistics, 3(1), pp.29~59 (1982)
  3. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana., "Requests and apologies : A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns(CCSARP)", Applied Linguistics, 5(3), pp.196~213 (1984)
  4. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana., "Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies" (1989), Ablex
  5. Brown, Penelope., "Politeness: Some universals in language usage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
  6. Byon, Andrew S., "Sociopragmatic analysis of Korean requests : Pedagogical settings", Journal of Pragmatics, 36, pp.1673~1704 (2004)
  7. Chang, Kum Young., "Linguistic politeness in requests by Korean learners of English", Journal of Linguistic Studies, 14(1), pp.63~91 (2009)
  8. Child, Jeffrey T., "Let’s be Facebook friends : Exploring parental Facebook friend requests from a Communication Privacy Management(CPM)perspective", Journal of Family Communication, 13(1), pp.46~59 (2013)
  9. Economidou-Kogetsidis, Maria., "Cross-cultural and situational variation in requesting behaviour : Perceptions of social situations and strategic usage of request patterns", Journal of Pragmatics, 42, pp.2262~2281 (2010)
  10. Ellis, Rod., "Learning to communicate in the classroom : A study of two language learners’ requests", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, pp.1~23 (1992)
  11. Eisenchlas, Susana A., "Gendered discursive practices on-line", Journal of Pragmatics, 44, pp.335~345 (2012)
  12. García, Carmen., "Disagreeing and requesting by Americans and Venezuelans", Linguistics and Education, 1, pp.299~322 (1989)
  13. Golato, Andrea., "Studying compliment responses : A comparison of DCTs and recordings of naturally occurring talk", Applied Linguistics, 24, pp.90~121 (2003)
  14. Goodwin, Marjorie H., "Women and language in literature and society", pp.157~173 (1980), Prager
  15. 한지원, "‘I want to skip your class’: Being polite in Korean interlanguage requests", 언어연구, 26(3), pp.161~179 (2009), 언어정보연구소
  16. Han, Sangkyung., "The interlanguage pragmatic development of the speech act of requests by Korean non-native speakers of English in an ESL setting", Ph.D., pp.2005
  17. Holmes, Janet., "Language and communication", pp.89~115 (1983), Longman
  18. 정은혁, "Requesting by Korean EFL University Learners with Respect to Power", 영어영문학, 51(5), pp.1133~1152 (2005), 한국영어영문학회
  19. “Could you calm down more?”: Requests and Korean ESL learners, "Kim, Julie.", 67~82, pp.Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 11 (1995)
  20. 김덕영, "한국인 대학생들의 중간어 요청화행에 관한 연구", 언어학, 16(1), pp.1~18 (2008), 대한언어학회
  21. Ko, Insoo., "Pragmatic transfer in EFL", ESL requests, 1998, pp.23(3), 399~430
  22. Koike, Dale A., "Pragmatic competence and adult L2 acquisition : Speech acts in interlanguage", The Modern Language Journal, 73(3), pp.279~289 (1989)
  23. 이문우, "Cross-cultural and Acquisitional Aspects of Interlanguage Pragmatics", 담화와 인지, 20(2), pp.193~212 (2013), 담화·인지언어학회
  24. Park, Kyung-Ja., "Cross-cultural distance learning and language acquisition" (2003), Hankook Publishing
  25. Rose, Kenneth R., "An exploratory cross-sectional study of interlanguage pragmatic development", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, pp.27~67 (2000)
  26. Sachs, Jacqueline., "Language, gender and sex in comparative perspective", pp.178~188 (1987), Cambridge University Press
  27. Searle, John. R., "Speech Acts" (1969), Cambridge University Press
  28. Searle, John. R., "Syntax and semantics: Speech acts", pp.59~82 (1975), Academic Press
  29. Searle, John. R., "Classification of illocutionary acts", Language in Society, 5, pp.1~23 (1976)
  30. Sotillo, Susana M, "Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication", Language Learning & Teaching, 4(1), pp.82~119 (2000)
  31. Suh, Jae-Suk., "ESL Korean learners’ use of external and internal modifications in request realization", Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED430400), ~ (1999)
  32. Takahashi, Satomi., "Margaret A. DuFon. 1989. Cross-linguistic influence in indirectness:The case of English directives performed by native Japanese speakers", ERIC database. (ED370439), ~ (1989)
  33. Thomas, Jenny., "Cross-cultural pragmatic failure", Applied Linguistics, 4(2), pp.91~112 (1983)
  34. Warschauer, Mark., "The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages", pp.207~212 (2001), Cambridge University Press
  35. West, Candace., "Language and gender: A reader", pp.328~353 (1998), Blackwell

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)