현대중국어 ‘是(shi)’ 부가의문문 형태의 질문-대답인접쌍에 대한 연구
A study on adjacency pairs of shi tag question-answer based on a spoken corpus of Mandarin Chinese
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study investigates several aspects of Chinese shi tag questions, includingtheir distributional properties, the sequential structures of those questions asadjacency pairs, and their functions in conversational contexts. Unlike previousstudies using invented data to analyze tag questions, this study focuses on shitag questions in naturally occurring conversation. In particular, the questions,shiba, shibushi, shima and bushima are examined for their respective functions. Analysis of the data shows that the functions of shi tag questions can be classifiedinto three major categories: 1) certaining the truth or falsity of previous informationdelivered by the speaker him/herself; 2) checking another interlocutor’s previousinformation by asking for it again; and 3) performing social, interactional functions. Chinese shi tag question utterances seem to function in conversation by inducingthe interlocutor’s collaboration, understanding, and preferred answers within theircommon speech actions. These findings suggest linkages between interaction anddiscourse functions for shi tag questions and the study may offer support fromChinese to the hypothesis that grammaticalization is a result of repeated daily,routinized use of language.
Abstract
This study investigates several aspects of Chinese shi tag questions, includingtheir distributional properties, the sequential structures of those questions asadjacency pairs, and their functions in conversational contexts. Unlike previousstudies using invented data to analyze tag questions, this study focuses on shitag questions in naturally occurring conversation. In particular, the questions,shiba, shibushi, shima and bushima are examined for their respective functions. Analysis of the data shows that the functions of shi tag questions can be classifiedinto three major categories: 1) certaining the truth or falsity of previous informationdelivered by the speaker him/herself; 2) checking another interlocutor’s previousinformation by asking for it again; and 3) performing social, interactional functions. Chinese shi tag question utterances seem to function in conversation by inducingthe interlocutor’s collaboration, understanding, and preferred answers within theircommon speech actions. These findings suggest linkages between interaction anddiscourse functions for shi tag questions and the study may offer support fromChinese to the hypothesis that grammaticalization is a result of repeated daily,routinized use of language.
참고문헌 (29)
- 김정은, "중국어 긍정응답어 ‘好’, ‘是’, ‘对’의 화용적 특징 고찰", 중국어문학논집, 69(69), pp.33~55 (2011), 중국어문학연구회
- 연동숙, "한중 긍정응답 대조 및 오류분석", 중국학연구, 24, pp.183~196 (2003), 중국학연구회
- 이준호, "현대중국어 '是' 부가의문문의 담화기능 연구", 석사, 중어중문학과, pp.2012
- Atkinson, J. Maxwell., "Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis" (1984), Cambridge University Press
- Bybee, Joan., "The effect of usage on degrees of constituency : the reduction of don’t in English", Linguistics, 37(4), pp.575~596 (1999)
- Du Bois, John W, "The discourse basis of ergativity", Language, 63(4), pp.805~855 (1987)
- Ford, Cecilia E., "Interaction and grammar", pp.134~184 (1996), Cambridge University Press
- Freed, Alice F., "The form and function of questions in informal dyadic conversation", Journal of Pragmatics, 21, pp.621~644 (1994)
- Heritage, John, "The limits of questioning: negative interrogatives and hostile question content", Journal of Pragmatics, 34(10-11), pp.1427~1446 (2002)
- Hopper, Paul., "The new psychology of language: cognitive and functional approaches to language structure", pp.155~176 (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum
- Koshik, Irene., "Wh-questions used as challenges", Discourse Studies, 5(1), pp.51~77 (2003)
- Li, Charles N., "Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar" (1981), University of California Press
- Norrick, Neal R., "Hunh-tags and evidentiality in conversation", Journal of Pragmatics, 23, pp.687~692 (1995)
- Ochs, Elinor., "Interaction and Grammar" (1996), Cambridge University Press
- Sacks, Harvey., "Lectures on conversation" (1972), Blackwell
- Sacks, Harvey., "A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation", Language, 50(4), pp.696~735 (1974)
- Schegloff, Emanuel., "Opening up closings", Semiotica, 7, pp.289~327 (1973)
- Schegloff, Emanuel., "Structures of social action", pp.28~53 (1984), Cambridge University Press
- Weber, Elizabeth G., "Varieties of questions in English conversation" (1993), John Benjamins
- 中國社會科學院語言研究所詞典編輯室, "現代漢語詞典" (2007), 商務印書館
- 呂叔湘, "中國文法要略" (1982), 商務印書館
- 嚴偉劍, "疑問代詞“怎麼”“怎樣”“怎麼樣”語用對比分析", 浙江外國語學院學報, 2, pp.8~12 (2012)
- 方梅, "載語法化與語法研究（二）" (2005), 商務印書館
- 李鹹菊, "北京話話語標記“是不是”“是吧”探析", 語言教學與研究, 2, pp.83~89 (2009)
- 虞海村, "作爲話語標記語的“是吧”", 沙洋師範高等專科學校學報, 12(3), pp.50~53 (2011)
- 邵敬敏, "“是不是VP”問句的肯定性傾向及其類型學意義", 世界漢語教學, 61, pp.23~36 (2002)
- 邵敬敏, "“Ｘ不Ｘ”附加問研究", 徐州師範學院學報, 4, pp.86~90 (1990)
- 閆亞平, "附加問句的修此功能", 碩士, pp.2006
- 陶煉, "“是不是”問句說略", 中國語文, 263, pp.105~107 (1998)