본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

가정적 인용표지의 담화 전략 연구

On discourse strategy of hypothetical quotatives in Korean.

구현정
담화·인지언어학회 (The Discourse and Cognitive Linguistics Society of Korea)|2015.08|담화와 인지 (Discourse and Cognition)|제22권 제2호|pp. 1-27|DOI 10.15718/discog.2015.22.2.1

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

grammaticalizationevidentialityconcessivediscourse strategystance markerhypothetical quotativepreemptivepseudo-quotative
주제분류언어학

초록

This research traces the developmental paths of the hypothetical quotatives -tayto and -layto from historical corpora and analyzes the development in view of grammaticalization mechanisms, with a special focus on their cognitive motivations. It further explores the discourse strategies they perform, thus identifying the relationship between the discourse strategies and grammatical markers. Following the grammaticalization principles, this paper argues that the development of those forms exhibits the divergence of the locution verb hA-, coexistence of multiple forms along the path (i.e., layering), phonological reduction and syntagmatic coalescence, among others. These hypothetical quotatives that originated from a source construction involving the grammatical devices for marking ‘quotation’ and ‘concessive’, also acquired the function as markers of intensified hypotheticality (i.e., irrealis hypothetical), and developed as markers of the speaker’s stance such as discontent. As a result of these functional expansions, the forms came to be recruited for strategically preempting the potential opposition from the discourse partner.

Abstract

This research traces the developmental paths of the hypothetical quotatives -tayto and -layto from historical corpora and analyzes the development in view of grammaticalization mechanisms, with a special focus on their cognitive motivations. It further explores the discourse strategies they perform, thus identifying the relationship between the discourse strategies and grammatical markers. Following the grammaticalization principles, this paper argues that the development of those forms exhibits the divergence of the locution verb hA-, coexistence of multiple forms along the path (i.e., layering), phonological reduction and syntagmatic coalescence, among others. These hypothetical quotatives that originated from a source construction involving the grammatical devices for marking ‘quotation’ and ‘concessive’, also acquired the function as markers of intensified hypotheticality (i.e., irrealis hypothetical), and developed as markers of the speaker’s stance such as discontent. As a result of these functional expansions, the forms came to be recruited for strategically preempting the potential opposition from the discourse partner.

참고문헌 (80)

  1. 구현정, "조건월의 화행", 국어학, 19, pp.453~472 (1989)
  2. 구현정, "조건의 의미에 관한 인지적 접근—인접 범주와의 관련성을 중심으로", 어문학연구, 7, pp.91~122 (1998), 상명대학교 어문학연구소
  3. 구현정, "패러다임과 패러다임의 결합：조건표지 확대 현상의 문법화적 접근", 한글, (287), pp.45~71 (2010), 한글학회
  4. 권재일, "한국어 인용 구문 유형의 변화와 인용 표지의 생성", 언어학, (22), pp.59~79 (1998), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  5. 김수태, "우리말의 인용표지에 대하여", 국어국문학, 31, pp.239~272 (1994)
  6. 김수태, "‘-다고, -느냐고, -으라고, -자고’에 대하여", 우리말연구, 9, pp.83~109 (1999)
  7. 김수태, "‘-다니, 느냐니, 으라니, -자니’에 대하여", 문창어문논집, 37, pp.499~524 (2000)
  8. 김수태, "‘-다면서, -으라면서, -자면서’에 대하여", 언어과학, 8(1), pp.5~21 (2001)
  9. 김수태, "융합씨끝 '-다지, -으라지'에 대하여", 한글, (258), pp.105~136 (2002), 한글학회
  10. 김종현, "유사 인용문의 발화 효과와 화자의 태도", 언어학, (26), pp.75~104 (2000), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  11. 김형주, "텔레비전 시사토론 대화의 구조와 전략", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.2010
  12. 박승윤, "양보와 조건", 담화와 인지, 14(1), pp.63~84 (2007), 담화·인지언어학회
  13. 박재연, "현대국어 반말체 종결어미 연구", 석사, 국어학, pp.1998
  14. 박진완, "현대국어의 형성과 변천 1: 음운․형태", pp.237~308 (2000), 박이정
  15. 안경화, "한국어 인용 구문의 연구 : 유형과 융합도를 중심으로", 박사, 언어학, pp.1995
  16. 안명철, "국어학의 새로운 인식과 전개. 김완진 선생님회갑기념논총", pp.723~743 (1991), 민음사
  17. 안주호, "후기 근대국어의 인용문 연구", 자하어문논집, 8, pp.359~408 (1991)
  18. 안주호, "인용문과 인용표지의 문법화에 대한 연구", 담화와 인지, 10(1), pp.145~165 (2003), 담화·인지언어학회
  19. 엄정호, "국어의 보문과 보문자" (2005), 태학사
  20. 우순조, "국어 어미의 통사적 지위", 국어학, 30, pp.225~256 (1997)
  21. 유명희, "‘-다고’와 ‘-답시고’에 대하여", 한국어문학연구, 8(1), pp.151~188 (1997)
  22. 이금희, "인용문 형식의 문법화？문법화 과정과 문법화 정도에 대하여", 國語學, (48), pp.233~258 (2006), 국어학회
  23. 이동혁, "현대국어의 형성과 변천 1: 음운․형태", pp.207~237 (2000), 박이정
  24. 이성하, "문법화의 이해" (1998), 한국문화사
  25. 이승욱, "종결어미의 통합적 관계. 난정 남광우박사 회갑기념논총" (1980), 일조각
  26. 이승재, "융합형의 형태 분석과 형태의 화석", 주시경학보, 10, pp.59~80 (1992)
  27. 이지양, "융합형 ‘래도’에 대하여", 관악어문연구, 10, pp.309~331 (1985)
  28. 李弼永, "현대국어의 인용구문에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1993
  29. 이필영, "통사적 구성에서의 축약에 대하여: ‘다-, 이라-, 더라-, 러-, 노라-’형을 중심으로", 국어학, 26, pp.1~32 (1995)
  30. 이현희, "중세국어 내적 화법의 성격", 한신대 논문집, 3, pp.191~228 (1986)
  31. 이현희, "국어 종결어미 발달에 대한 관견", 국어학, 11, pp.143~163 (1987), 국어학회
  32. 전정미, "설득 화법의 원리와 방법", 화법연구, 8, pp.31~54 (2005)
  33. 채숙희, "結果의 ‘-라고’와 目的의 ‘-자고’에 對하여", 어문연구(語文硏究), 39(3), pp.97~119 (2011), 한국어문교육연구회
  34. 최웅환, "인용표지의 생성", 언어과학연구, 16, pp.557~582 (1999)
  35. Aikhenvald, Alexandra, "Evidentiality" (2004), Oxford University Press
  36. Aikhenvald, Alexandra, "Studies in evidentiality" (2003), John Benjamins
  37. Buchstaller, Isabelle., "Quotatives: New trends and sociolinguistic implications" (2014), Wiley Blackwell
  38. Buchstaller, Isabelle, "Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives" (2012), John Benjamins
  39. Bybee, Joan L., "The evolution of grammar:tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world" (1994), The University of Chicago Press
  40. Chafe, Wallace, "Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology", pp.261~272 (1986), Ablex
  41. Chappell, Hilary, "Variation in the grammaticalization of complementizers from verba dicendi in Sinitic languages", Linguistic Typology, 12, pp.45~98 (2008)
  42. Clift, Rebecca, "Indexing stance: Reported speech as an interactional evidential", Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10(5), pp.569~595 (2006)
  43. Clift, Rebecca, "Reporting talk: Reported speech in interaction", pp.1~15 (2007), Cambridge University Press
  44. Du Bois, John W., "Iconicity in syntax", pp.343~365 (1985), John Benjamins
  45. Fitzmaurice, Susan, "Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the historical construction of interlocutor stance: From stance markers to discourse markers", Discourse Studies, 6(4), pp.427~448 (2004)
  46. Frajzyngier, Zygmunt, "Grammaticalization of the complex sentence: A case study in Chadic" (1996), John Benjamins
  47. Givón, Talmy., "Discourse and syntax: Syntax and semantics 12" (1979), Academic Press
  48. Goffman, Erving, "Frame analysis" (1986), Northeastern University Press
  49. Gvozdanović, Jadranka, "Reported speech: Forms and functions of the verb", pp.57~71 (1996), John Benjamins
  50. Haiman, John, "Iconicity in syntax" (1985), John Benjamins
  51. 하이네, "The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization", pp.56~68 (2011), Oxford University Press
  52. 하이네, "The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization", pp.342~355 (2011), Oxford University Press
  53. Heine, Bernd, "문법의 인지적 기초" (2004), 박이정
  54. Heine, Bernd, "World lexicon of grammaticalization" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  55. Himmelmann, Nikolaus P., "What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components", pp.21~42 (2004), Mouton de Gruyter
  56. Hopper, Paul J., "The iconicity of the universal categories “noun” and “verb”. Iconicity in syntax", pp.151~183 (1985), John Benjamins
  57. Hopper, Paul J., "Approaches to grammaticalization:Typological studies in language", pp.17~35 (1991), John Benjamins
  58. Hopper, Paul J., "Grammaticalization" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  59. Hopper, Paul J., "Transitivity in grammar and discourse", Language, 56(2), pp.251~299 (1980)
  60. Kaltenböck, Gunther, "On thetical grammar", Studies in Language, 35(4), pp.848~893 (2011)
  61. Klamer, Marian, "How report verbs become quote markers and complementizers", Lingua, 110, pp.69~98 (2000)
  62. Koo, Hyun Jung, "On an emerging paradigm of sentence-final particles of discontent: A grammaticalization perspective", Language Sciences, 37, pp.70~89 (2013)
  63. Kwon, Iksoo., "Viewpoints in the Korean verbal complex: Evidence, perception, assessment, and time", 박사, pp.2012
  64. Lehmann, Christian, "Thoughts on grammaticalization" (1995), Lincom Europa
  65. Lichtenberk, Frantisek, "Language change and heterosemy in grammaticalization", Language, 67(3), pp.475~509 (1991)
  66. Lord, Carol, "Historical change in serial verb constructions (Typological Studies in Language (TSL) 26)" (1993), John Benjamins
  67. Mayes, Patricia, "Quotation in spoken English", Studies in Language, 14(2), pp.325~363 (1990), John Benjamins
  68. Meillet, Antoine, "Linguistique Historique et Linguistique Génerale", pp.130~148 (1948)
  69. Rhee, Seongha, "Through a borrowed mouth: Reported speech and subjectification in Korean", LACUS Forum, 34, pp.201~210 (2009)
  70. Rhee, Seongha, "Context-induced reinterpretation and (inter)subjectification: The case of grammaticalization of sentence-final particles", Language Sciences, 34, pp.284~300 (2012)
  71. Rhee, Seongha, "Rhetorical reportatives and intersubjectification", Paper presented at New Reflections on Grammaticalization V Conference (2012)
  72. Rhee, Seongha, "“I know you are not, but if you were asking me”: On emergence of discourse markers of topic presentation from hypothetical questions", Journal of Pragmatics, 60, pp.1~16 (2014)
  73. Sohn, Sung-Ock, "Historical development of quotative constructions in Korean", Japanese Korean Linguistics, 18, pp.126~143 (2011)
  74. Sperber, Dan, "Metarepresentations: A multidisciplinary perspective" (2000), Oxford University Press
  75. Spronck, Stef., "Quotatives:Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives", pp.71~116 (2012), John Benjamins
  76. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, "Approaches to grammaticalization: Typological studies in language", pp.189~218 (1991), John Benjamins
  77. Tynan, John, "On conditionals again", pp.115~142 (1997), John Benjamins
  78. von der Gabelentz, Georg, "An introduction to language" (1901), Hartcourt Brace
  79. Wiemer, Björn, "Database on evidentiality markers in European" (2010), Akademie Verlag
  80. Wierzbicka, Anna, "On conditionals again", pp.15~59 (1997), John Benjamins

관련 논문AI추천

‘-기는’ 구문의 문법화구현정담화·인지언어학회 · 담화와 인지2012 · 제19권 제3호From Politeness Discourse Strategy to Grammar: Grammaticalization of Stance Markers이성하언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2011 · 제59호Bare Direct Quotation and Speaker’s Stance in Korean이성하언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2007 · 제43호引用標識 ‘하고’의 文法化이강혁한국어문교육연구회 · 어문연구(語文硏究)2024 · 제52권 제3호“아니, 안 하는 게 아니잖아”: 부정 표현의 문법화구현정담화·인지언어학회 · 담화와 인지2008 · 제15권 제3호Analogy­-driven grammaticalization: A case of grammaticalization of sentence­-final markers from concomitance-­connectives이성하한국현대언어학회 · 언어연구2014 · 제31권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

한국어 구어 말뭉치에서 접속부사 중첩 구성 연구김현지pp. 29-52L2 한국어 학습자의 종속절 산출과 통사적 복합도김영주, 백준오pp. 53-74자기칭찬 회피를 위한 구성원 범주화 장치의 사용유여란pp. 75-99중앙아시아 고려말 의문사의 담화 기능:‘무슥, 무스, 무스거, 무슨’을 중심으로이기갑pp. 101-128상호작용적 자원으로서의 현대중국어 어기조사 ‘吧’이지원pp. 129-149
원문 보기