본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국어 ‘명사성 형용사’ 단어 부류의 정립: 그 유형론과 부사 파생

The Korean Nouny Adjectives: their typology and adverbial derivation

1

조회

0

다운로드

16

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

The aims of this paper are two-folded. The first one is to propose that 'ida' of 'gyeongjejeok(=economic)-ida' and 'hada' of 'yumyeong(=famous)-hada' be analysed as copulas in Korean grammar. The second one is to examine the possibility of analyzing '-(eu)ro2' as a derivational suffix deriving adverb from adjectivals such as 'sijeok(=poetic)', 'gyeongjejeok(=economic)', etc. This derivational suffix '-(eu)ro2' is distinguished from the case particle '-(eu)ro1' in 'doggi-ro(=with an axe)'. The suffix '-hi/-i' is the same case, which derives adverbs from adjectivals such as 'joyong(=quiet)', 'ggaeggeut(=clean)', etc. These two above-mentioned discussions are based on Mok(2003) and Mok(2009c), which analyzed 'hada' and 'ida' as support verbs on the syntactico-semantic level. It was shown there that the lexemes X's in the construction 'X-hada' and the lexemes Y's in the construction 'Y-ida' behave the same syntactico-semantically. For this, I compared 'yumyeong-hada(=be famous)' with 'gyeongjejeok-ida(=be economic)'. Both 'yumyeong(=famous)' and 'gyeongjejeok(=economic)' do not function as an argument of predicates, and have the same adjectival properties, so that 'ida' and 'hada' are in complementary distribution. I define this kind of lexemes as 'nouny adjectives', including 'adnominals' in contrast with verby adjectives such as 'keuda(=be big)', 'nopta(=be high)', etc.

Abstract

The aims of this paper are two-folded. The first one is to propose that 'ida' of 'gyeongjejeok(=economic)-ida' and 'hada' of 'yumyeong(=famous)-hada' be analysed as copulas in Korean grammar. The second one is to examine the possibility of analyzing '-(eu)ro2' as a derivational suffix deriving adverb from adjectivals such as 'sijeok(=poetic)', 'gyeongjejeok(=economic)', etc. This derivational suffix '-(eu)ro2' is distinguished from the case particle '-(eu)ro1' in 'doggi-ro(=with an axe)'. The suffix '-hi/-i' is the same case, which derives adverbs from adjectivals such as 'joyong(=quiet)', 'ggaeggeut(=clean)', etc. These two above-mentioned discussions are based on Mok(2003) and Mok(2009c), which analyzed 'hada' and 'ida' as support verbs on the syntactico-semantic level. It was shown there that the lexemes X's in the construction 'X-hada' and the lexemes Y's in the construction 'Y-ida' behave the same syntactico-semantically. For this, I compared 'yumyeong-hada(=be famous)' with 'gyeongjejeok-ida(=be economic)'. Both 'yumyeong(=famous)' and 'gyeongjejeok(=economic)' do not function as an argument of predicates, and have the same adjectival properties, so that 'ida' and 'hada' are in complementary distribution. I define this kind of lexemes as 'nouny adjectives', including 'adnominals' in contrast with verby adjectives such as 'keuda(=be big)', 'nopta(=be high)', etc.

참고문헌 (53)

  1. 고영근, "우리말 문법론" (2008), 집문당
  2. 김영욱, "불완전계열에 대한 형태론적 연구", 국어학, 24, pp.87~109 (1994)
  3. 김주상, "용언 활용형에서 기원한 관형사 연구", 국어연구, (217) (2010)
  4. 南美惠, "四字成語의 유형과 문법", 어문연구(語文硏究), 35(1), pp.139~164 (2007), 한국어문교육연구회
  5. 남미혜, "國語 固有語 名詞의 不完全 曲用 硏究", 어문연구(語文硏究), 37(3), pp.81~104 (2009), 한국어문교육연구회
  6. 노명희, "현대국어 한자어 연구" (2005), 태학사
  7. 노명희, "語根 槪念의 再檢討", 어문연구(語文硏究), 37(1), pp.59~84 (2009), 한국어문교육연구회
  8. 시정곤, "한국어 문법론의 연구 현황과 과제" (2003), 박이정
  9. 목정수, "A Continuity of Adjectives in Korean -from a prototypical perspective", 언어학, 8(45), pp.87~111 (2006), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  10. 목정수, "형태론과 통사론 사이에: 통사론적 단위 설정을 중심으로", 한국어학, 37, pp.127~147 (2007), 한국어학회
  11. 목정수, "일본어 형용사와 형용동사의 유형론적 함의:한국어 형용사 어근 등의 품사 분류와 관련하여", 언어연구, 25(3), pp.23~37 (2008), 언어정보연구소
  12. 목정수, "한국어 명사성 형용사의 설정 문제 -유형론적 접근과 국어교육적 활용", 국어교육, 38(128), pp.387~418 (2009), 한국어교육학회
  13. 목정수, "수상한 수식 구조에 대하여-부사의 境界에서", 어문론집, 40(40), pp.5~38 (2009), 중앙어문학회
  14. 목정수, "한국어, 문법 그리고 사유" (2009), 태학사
  15. 목정수, "계사 유형론의 관점에서 본 한국어 ‘(시적)이다", (유명)하다’의 정체, 2010, pp.9(19), 99~125[DOI]
  16. 송정근, "현대국어 감각형용사의 형태론적 연구", 박사, pp.2007
  17. 송철의, "언어 변화와 언어의 화석, In 국어사 자료와 국어학의 연구", pp.352~370 (1993), 문학과지성사
  18. 유재원, "우리말 역순사전" (1985), 정음사
  19. 이성규, "日本語形容動詞の一問題", 日本学報, 56(1), pp.1~17 (2003)
  20. 이종인, "번역은 글쓰기다" (2009), 즐거운상상
  21. 이창열, "日本語の名詞⋅形容動詞⋅形容詞⋅動詞についての分析", 日語日文学硏究, 17(1), pp.349~373 (1990)
  22. 이현희, "현대국어의 화석과 그 역사적 해석", 國語學, 27(45), pp.275~288 (2005), 국어학회
  23. 장윤희, "공시적 형태 분석에서의 언어 화석 처리 방안", 제54차 한국어학회전국학술대회 발표문 (2010)
  24. 하경식, "日本語における形容語の研究: 韓国語の形容詞との対照を通して", 박사, pp.2006
  25. 허웅, "20세기 우리말의 형태론" (1995), 샘 문화사
  26. Anward, J., "Parts of speech, In Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook" (2001), Walter de Gruyter
  27. Backhouse, A. E., "Inflected and Uninflected Adjectives in Japan, In Adjective Classes: A Cross-Linguistic Typology", pp.50~73 (2004), Oxford University Press
  28. Beck, D., "The Typology of Parts of Speech Systems" (2002), Routledge
  29. Bhat, D. N. S., "The Adjectival Category. Criteria for differentiation and identification" (1999), John Benjamins
  30. Blackwell, A. A., "On the acquisition of the syntax of English adjectives", CLS, 36(2), pp.361~375 (2000)
  31. Bolinger, Dwight, "Adjectives in English: Attribution and Predication", Lingua, 18, pp.1~34 (1967)
  32. Chin, Andy C., "Grammaticalization of GIVE in the Yue Dialects", Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on the Yue Dialects (2005), Chinese Language Association
  33. Croft, W., "Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations" (1991), University of Chicago Press
  34. Croft, W., "Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic theory in Typological Perspective" (2001), Oxford University Press
  35. Dixon, R. M. W., "Where have all the adjectives gone", Studies in Language, 1, pp.19~80 (1977)
  36. Dixon, R.M.W., "Adjective Classes: A Cross-Linguistic Typology" (2004), Oxford University Press
  37. Dixon, R. M. W., "Basic Linguistic Theory Vo1. 1, Methodology" (2010), Oxford Univ. Press
  38. Dixon, R. M. W., "Basic Linguistic Theory Vo1. 2, Grammatical Topics" (2010), Oxford Univ. Press
  39. Feuillet, J., "Introduction à la typologie linguistique" (2006), Honoré Champion
  40. Hengeveld, H., "Non-verbal predication" (1992), Mouton de Gruyter
  41. Lee, H. H. B., "Korean grammar" (1989), Oxford University Press
  42. Li, "A mechanism for the development of copula morphemes", pp.419~444 (1977)
  43. Li, C.N., "Mechanisms of syntactic change" (1977), University of Texas Press
  44. Newman, J., "Give: A Cognitive Linguistic Study" (1996), Mouton de Gruyter
  45. Pustet, R., "Copulas: Universals in the Categorization of the Lexicon" (2003), Oxford University Press
  46. Schachter, P., "Parts-of-speech systems, In Language Typology and Syntactic Description", pp.1~60 (2007), Cambridge University Press
  47. Sohn, H.-M., "Korean" (1994), Routledge
  48. Sohn, H.-M., "The Korean Language" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  49. Sohn, H.-M., "The Adjective Class in Korean, In Adjective Classes: A Cross-Linguistic Typology", pp.223~241 (2004), Oxford University Press
  50. Song, J. J., "The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology" (2011), Oxford University Press
  51. Stassen, L., "Intransitive predication" (1997), Clarendon
  52. Vogel, P., "Approaches to the typology of word classes" (2000), Mouton de Gruyter
  53. Wetzer, H., "The Typology of Adjectival Predication" (1996), Mouton de Gruyter

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)