형용사(구) 형성에 대한 완료의 역할 연구
A Study on the Role of Completive for Adjectival Formation
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, the phenomenon of how the morphemes of completive contribute to adjectival derivation is examined. It is considered a typical phenomenon of European participles. The verbal phrase sometimes presents the static situation like an adjectival phrase when it is conjugated with completive or past morphemes. These morphemes make the VPs to be static when it is conjugated with either passive or achievement verbs. In case that ‘-n’ is conjugated directly with the roots of the verbs, the verb is derived to adjectives on the lexical level. However ‘-eot-’ cannot make adjective on lexical level because it cannot delete the voice as well as the thematic role on the lexical structure. Despite the difference of morphological present situation between European and Korean adjectival categories, the universality of the role of completive morphemes for adjectival derivation is suggested.
Abstract
In this paper, the phenomenon of how the morphemes of completive contribute to adjectival derivation is examined. It is considered a typical phenomenon of European participles. The verbal phrase sometimes presents the static situation like an adjectival phrase when it is conjugated with completive or past morphemes. These morphemes make the VPs to be static when it is conjugated with either passive or achievement verbs. In case that ‘-n’ is conjugated directly with the roots of the verbs, the verb is derived to adjectives on the lexical level. However ‘-eot-’ cannot make adjective on lexical level because it cannot delete the voice as well as the thematic role on the lexical structure. Despite the difference of morphological present situation between European and Korean adjectival categories, the universality of the role of completive morphemes for adjectival derivation is suggested.
참고문헌 (27)
- 강명윤, "DP와 국어의 명사구-지시사"그"를 중심으로", 한국어학, 13, pp.15~51 (2001)
- 국립국어원, "표준국어대사전" (2001), 두산동아
- 김선영, "‘잘생기다’류 용언에서의 ‘-었-’의 文法的 地位와 機能", 어문연구(語文硏究), 41(3), pp.67~92 (2013), 한국어문교육연구회
- 김선영, "상태 동사와 ‘잘생기다’류", 진단학보, (120), pp.159~191 (2014), 진단학회
- 박옥줄, "불문의 구조-하" (1999), 서울대학교출판부
- 배주채, "'잘생기다' 류의 품사", 한국학연구, (32), pp.375~409 (2014), 한국학연구소
- 오충연, "국어 피동의 상", 어문학, (100), pp.111~141 (2008), 한국어문학회
- 오충연, "대격의 교체를 보이는 구성에 대하여", 國語學, (55), pp.27~54 (2009), 국어학회
- 오충연, "국어 결과 구문의 범주 설정에 대한 연구", 언어연구, 26(3), pp.595~619 (2010), 한국현대언어학회
- 오충연, "국어의 완료상과 구문구조", 국어국문학, (166), pp.109~140 (2014), 국어국문학회
- 윤우열, "과거분사의 문법적 지위에 대하여", 프랑스문화예술연구, 41, pp.159~178 (2012), 프랑스문화예술학회
- 이연화, "AP 결과술어와 PP 결과술어의 비교", 언어연구, 24(2), pp.281~297 (2008), 한국현대언어학회
- 이해정, "독일어 제 I 분사의 문법성에 관한 시간 의미론적 고찰", 독일어문화권연구, (15), pp.243~269 (2006), 독일어문화권연구소
- 이환묵, "학교문법의 윤곽과 성립", 영어사, 4, pp.2~29 (1996), 한국영어학회
- 최종찬, "힌디어 분사의 특성과 제약", 담화와 인지, 9(1), pp.205~228 (2002), 담화·인지언어학회
- Alexiadou, A., "The Argument Structure of Adjectival Participles Revisited", Lingua, 149, pp.118~138 (2014)
- Levin, B., "The Formation of Adjectival Passives", Linguistic Inquiry, 17(4), pp.623~661 (1986)
- Brown, R., "A First Language: the Early Stages" (1973), Harvard University
- Comrie, B., "Aspect" (1976), Cambridge University Press
- Embick, D., "On the Structure of Resultative Participles in English", Linguistic Inquiry, 35, pp.355~392 (2004)
- Grimshaw, J., "Argument Structure" (1990), MIT Press
- Guéron, J., "On the Difference between Telicity and Perfectivity", Lingua, 118, pp.1816~1840 (2008)
- Kádár, E., "The Role of the Predicative Participle Construction in the C’sango Tense-aspect System", Philobiblon, XV, pp.194~225 (2010)
- Kim, Min-Joo, "The Absence of the Adjective Category in Korean", Ms., pp.2005
- Kratzer, A., "Building Stative", Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (2000), Berkeley Linguistics Society
- Smith, C. S., "The Parameter of Aspect" (1990), Kluwer
- Vendler, Z., "Linguistics in Philosophy" (1967), Cornell University