본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

힘 영상도식의 신체화 연구: TV 토론프로그램 참여자의 손짓을 중심으로

A study of embodiment of force schema: focusing on the hand gestures of participants in the TV debate program

임혜원
담화·인지언어학회 (The Discourse and Cognitive Linguistics Society of Korea)|2017.02|담화와 인지 (Discourse and Cognition)|제24권 제1호|pp. 93-112|DOI 10.15718/discog.2017.24.1.93

0

조회

0

다운로드

8

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

신체화몸짓body languageembodiment영상도식image schemahand gesture동작언어손짓힘 영상도식힘 도식force schema
주제분류언어학

초록

The current study examines how the force schema is related to the form of action language from the point of view of cognitive linguistics. Starting from the hypothesis that conceptual structures such as image schema or metaphor are revealed in the subconscious action language, which is simultaneously realized at the point of utterance, this study investigates how the force schema, one of the image schemata, is reflected in hand gestures. Force is an essential element in interaction with the surroundings for human beings living as organisms. The structure of force conceptually plays a central role in understanding human experience as it is combined with force-based activities. Johnson(1987) calls the image schemata including the force schema experiential gestalt, meaning it is an integrated whole structure within our experience, and categorizes it into the structure of force COMPULSION, BLOCKAGE, COUNTERFORCE, DIVERSION, and REMOVAL OF RESTRAINT. As such an image schema is structured based on experience, hand gestures we make while talking naturally reflect the image schemata.

Abstract

The current study examines how the force schema is related to the form of action language from the point of view of cognitive linguistics. Starting from the hypothesis that conceptual structures such as image schema or metaphor are revealed in the subconscious action language, which is simultaneously realized at the point of utterance, this study investigates how the force schema, one of the image schemata, is reflected in hand gestures. Force is an essential element in interaction with the surroundings for human beings living as organisms. The structure of force conceptually plays a central role in understanding human experience as it is combined with force-based activities. Johnson(1987) calls the image schemata including the force schema experiential gestalt, meaning it is an integrated whole structure within our experience, and categorizes it into the structure of force COMPULSION, BLOCKAGE, COUNTERFORCE, DIVERSION, and REMOVAL OF RESTRAINT. As such an image schema is structured based on experience, hand gestures we make while talking naturally reflect the image schemata.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. 권익수, "군대 수신호에 나타난 도상성과 개념적 은유 분석", 담화인지언어학회 2015 가을학술대회 발표논문집, pp.57~67 (2015)
  2. 김영순, "한국인 손동작의 의미와 화용", 한국어의미학, 6, pp.27~47 (2000)
  3. 김영순, "신체언어 연구의 생태학적 관점", 현대문법연구, (29), pp.139~165 (2002), 현대문법학회
  4. 도원영, "말하기에서의 동작 언어에 대한 고찰 －자기소개와 프레젠테이션을 중심으로－", 한국어학, 39, pp.191~221 (2008), 한국어학회
  5. 손세모돌, "신체언어 연구: 발표에서의 신체 동작을 중심으로", 한말연구, 10, pp.115~156 (2002)
  6. 이정은, "미국 대선 후보 공개토론회에 나타난 손짓 언어: 은유적 손짓을 중심으로", 담화와 인지, 23(2), pp.53~79 (2016), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
  7. 임규홍, "한국어 혼자 말하기에서 ‘손짓언어’ 사용의 분석 연구", 담화와 인지, 10(1), pp.191~215 (2003), 담화·인지언어학회
  8. 임지룡, "의미작용과 기호작용의 통합", 현대문법연구, 18, pp.129~146 (1999)
  9. 임지룡, "신체언어와 일상언어 표현의 의사소통적 상관성", 언어과학연구, 17, pp.59~78 (2000)
  10. 임혜원, "동작언어 분석을 통한 영상도식의 신체화 연구 척도 도식을 중심으로", 언어와언어학, (48), pp.135~164 (2010), 언어연구소
  11. 임혜원, "한국어 사용자의 손짓언어 연구 - 잡기", 쥐기 손짓을 중심으로 -, 2015, pp.(30), 303~324[DOI]
  12. 임혜원, "손날의 의미", 기능 연구 – 토론 참여자의 손짓언어를 중심으로 –, 2015, pp.(69), 107~128[DOI]
  13. Armstrong, David E., "Gesture and the nature of language" (1995), Cambridge University Press
  14. Bressem, Jana, "Clusters of image schematic patterns in coverbal gestures", Talk presented at the third conference of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, 2008 (2008)
  15. Cienki, Alan, "STRAIGHT : An image schema and its metaphorical extensions", Cognitive Linguistics, 9(2), pp.107~149 (1998)
  16. Cienki, Alan, "From perception to meaning: Image schema in cognitive linguistics, vol. 29" (2005), Mouton de Gruyter
  17. Cienki, Alan, "Metaphor and gesture", pp.5~25 (2010), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  18. Cienki, Alan., "Multimodality and cognitive linguistics", pp.195~209 (2015), John Benjamins Publishing
  19. Cienki, Alan, "Metaphor and gesture" (2010), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  20. Condon, William S, "Sound film analysis of normal and pathological behavior patterns", Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 143, pp.338~347 (1966)
  21. Condon, William S, "A segmentation of behavior", Journal of Psychiatric, 5, pp.221~235 (1967)
  22. Deane, Paul D, "Grammar in mind and brain: Explorations in cognitive syntax" (1993), Mouton de Gruyter
  23. Iverson, Jana M., "Gesture when there is no visual model. The nature and function of gesture in children's communication", New Directions for Child Development, 79, pp.89~116 (1998)
  24. Johnson, Mark, "The body in the mind" (1987), The University of Chicago Press
  25. Johnson, Mark, "Philosophical implications of cognitive semantics", Cognitive Linguistics, 3(4), pp.345~366 (1992)
  26. Kendon, Adam, "Studies in dyadic communication, eds", pp.177~219 (1972), Pergamon Press
  27. Kendon, Adam, "제스처" (2012), 박이정
  28. Lakoff, George, "Metaphor and thought", pp.202~251 (1993), Cambridge University Press
  29. Lakoff, George, "Metaphors we live by" (1980), The University of Chicago Press
  30. Lakoff, George, "More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor" (1989), The University of Chicago Press
  31. Lücking, Andy, "Finding recurrent features of image schema gestures: The FIGURE corpus", Conference: 10th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (2016)
  32. McNeill, David, "Hand and mind" (1992), The University of Chicago Press
  33. McNeill, David, "Gesture and thought" (2005), The University of Chicago Press
  34. McNeill, David, "Language and gesture", pp.141~161 (2000), Cambridge University Press
  35. Montredon, Jacques, "Metaphor and gesture", pp.171~194 (2010), John Benjamins Publishing Company
  36. Wolff-Michael Roth, "How Does the Body Get Into the Mind?", Human Studies, 25(3), pp.333~358 (2002), Springer Nature[DOI]
  37. Sweetser, Eve, "Actes du 16e Congrès International des Linguistes (CD-ROM)" (1998), Elsevier
  38. Tracy, Jessica, "The spontaneous expression of pride and shame:Evidence for biologically innate nonverbal displays", Proceedings of the National Academies of Sciences, 105, pp.11655~11660 (2008)
  39. Williams, Robert, "Path schemas in gesturing for thinking and teaching", Talk presented at the third conference of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association (2008)
  40. Zlatev, Jordan, "Image schemas, mimetic schemas, and children’s gestures", Cognitive Semiotics, 7(1), pp.3~29 (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

언어적/비언어적 발화 분석을 통한 척도도식의 개념화 양상 연구임혜원담화·인지언어학회 · 담화와 인지2021 · 제28권 제2호미국 대선 후보 공개토론회에 나타난 손짓 언어: 은유적 손짓을 중심으로권익수, 박영은, 이정은, 전진리담화·인지언어학회 · 담화와 인지2016 · 제23권 제2호한국어 사용자의 손짓언어 연구 - 잡기/쥐기 손짓을 중심으로 -임혜원한국화법학회 · 화법연구2015 · 제30호영어 ‘hand’와 한국어 ‘손’의 영상도식에 대한 가치론적 비교분석박기성, 황현미새한영어영문학회 · 새한영어영문학2015 · 제57권 제2호한국수어에 나타난 개념의 신체화 : [봄]. [여름]. [가을], [겨울], [밤], [낮] 수어를 중심으로최영주한국언어과학회 · 언어과학2021 · 제28권 제3호코미디담화에 나타난 손짓언어 분석: 수어 및 구어와의 비교를 중심으로임수진언어과학회 · 언어과학연구2020 · 제92호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

Aspects of Meaning in Interaction: Incomplete Interpretive Hypotheses in L2 Discourse국지연pp. 1-21Medicine for Shoes and Lanterns: The Semantic Network of Yak ‘medicine’ in Korean권익수pp. 23-45종결어미 {-(으)실게요}의 기능과 형성과정안주호pp. 47-67정치은유와 프레임형성: '한국사 교과서 국정화' 정치 담화를 중심으로이창봉, 김은주pp. 69-92인지문법: 언어 본질의 탐구는 일반 인지능력을 떠날 수 없다나익주pp. 113-118
원문 보기