만주어 격 표지 be의 분포와 기능
Distribution and Functions of Manchu Case Marker be
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines the distribution and functions of be in Manchu language. be, the accusative Case of Manchu, always maintains the single form regardless of phonological environment. Although it is usually used in independent form, it can also be combined with other words. As Manchu language has free word order, be appears in all positions in a sentence except for the back of a predicate. In some cases, only the accusative arguments appear in transitive verb sentences because nominative arguments are often deleted. The usage of be is determined by whether an accusative argument is a specific object or not. In other words, the occurrence of the accusative Case marker be is related to the specificity or definiteness of a noun. be basically serves as an accusative Case marker, while it sometimes functions as a topic marker or an indicator of transitivity. Furthermore, be can substitute Case marker of locative noun phrase.
Abstract
This paper examines the distribution and functions of be in Manchu language. be, the accusative Case of Manchu, always maintains the single form regardless of phonological environment. Although it is usually used in independent form, it can also be combined with other words. As Manchu language has free word order, be appears in all positions in a sentence except for the back of a predicate. In some cases, only the accusative arguments appear in transitive verb sentences because nominative arguments are often deleted. The usage of be is determined by whether an accusative argument is a specific object or not. In other words, the occurrence of the accusative Case marker be is related to the specificity or definiteness of a noun. be basically serves as an accusative Case marker, while it sometimes functions as a topic marker or an indicator of transitivity. Furthermore, be can substitute Case marker of locative noun phrase.
참고문헌 (18)
- 도정업, "≪滿文老檔≫과 ≪滿洲實錄≫의 만주문 대조 연구", 알타이학보, (25), pp.1~35 (2015), 한국알타이학회[DOI]
- 박철우, "한국어 정보구조에서의 화제와 초점", 박사, 언어학, pp.1998
- 연재훈, "타동성의 정의를 위한 원형이론적 접근", 언어, 22(1), pp.107~132 (1997)
- 연재훈, "한국어 구문 유형론" (2011), 태학사
- T.Otgontuul, "한국어와 만주어 격어미 비교 연구: 청어노걸대를 중심으로", 석사, 국어학, pp.2003
- Togtokh Otgontuul, "한국어, 몽골어, 만주어 격어미 비교 연구", 박사, 국어학, pp.2009
- 이정민, "(비)한정성", (불)특정성 대 화제(Topic), 단계 층위 술어와도 관련하여-, pp.국어학, 1992[DOI]
- 전영철, "한국어의 소위 특정성 표지들에 대하여", 언어, 30(4), pp.715~743 (2005), 한국언어학회
- 전영철, "대조 화제와 대조 초점의 표지 ‘는’", 한글, (274), pp.171~200 (2006), 한글학회
- 전영철, "‘이", 가’ 주제설에 대하여, 2009, pp.16(3), 217~238[DOI]
- 채완, "助詞‘는’의 意味", 국어학, 4, pp.93~113 (1976)
- 趙志忠, "從「淸文啓蒙」看淸代前期滿族人的雙語使用", 滿語硏究, 1, pp.26~31 (2000)
- 岸田文隆, "三譯總解 底本考", 알타이학보, 2, pp.87~103 (1990)
- 河內良弘, "滿洲語文語入門" (2002), 京都大學校學術出版會
- Hooper, P. J., "Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse", Language, 56, pp.251~299 (1980)
- Gorelova, L. M., "Manchu Grammar" (2002), Brill
- Lyons, C., "Definiteness" (1999), Cambridge Univ. Press
- Norman, J., "A Sketch of Sibe Morphology", Central Asiatic Journal, 18(3), pp.159~173 (1974)