논항의 유형과 실현 양상 - 생성 어휘부 이론을 중심으로 -
Types of Argument and their Realization: focusing on the Generative Lexicon Theory
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to suggest that it is impossible to discriminate just between argument and adjunct and to demonstrate that the close relation between the meaning of verb and the argument realization by investigating how each type of argument is realized, based on the subtypes of argument in the Generative Lexicon Theory. Through reviewing the previous studies, I conclude that the semantic obligatoriness should be considered before the syntactic obligatoriness when deciding the argumenthood. In the Generative Lexicon Theory, arguments are classified to true argument, default argument, shadow argument and true adjunct. Among these subtypes of argument, true argument is syntactically and semantically obligatory, whereas default argument and shadow argument are syntactically optional but semantically obligatory. Default argument and shadow argument are discriminated each other because default argument is related to the other true argument within a sentence but shadow argument is incorporated into the meaning of verb. In the argument realization, true argument is realized in a sentence according to the headedness of event structure but default argument and shadow argument are realized as oblique cases. However, in the cognate constructions of Korean and English, shadow argument can be as direct object according to how shadow argument is incorporated into the meaning of its verb. This is another evidence that the meaning of the verb plays a critical role in the argument realization.
Abstract
This paper aims to suggest that it is impossible to discriminate just between argument and adjunct and to demonstrate that the close relation between the meaning of verb and the argument realization by investigating how each type of argument is realized, based on the subtypes of argument in the Generative Lexicon Theory. Through reviewing the previous studies, I conclude that the semantic obligatoriness should be considered before the syntactic obligatoriness when deciding the argumenthood. In the Generative Lexicon Theory, arguments are classified to true argument, default argument, shadow argument and true adjunct. Among these subtypes of argument, true argument is syntactically and semantically obligatory, whereas default argument and shadow argument are syntactically optional but semantically obligatory. Default argument and shadow argument are discriminated each other because default argument is related to the other true argument within a sentence but shadow argument is incorporated into the meaning of verb. In the argument realization, true argument is realized in a sentence according to the headedness of event structure but default argument and shadow argument are realized as oblique cases. However, in the cognate constructions of Korean and English, shadow argument can be as direct object according to how shadow argument is incorporated into the meaning of its verb. This is another evidence that the meaning of the verb plays a critical role in the argument realization.
참고문헌 (23)
- 김영희, "논항의 판별 기준", 한글, (266), pp.139~167 (2004), 한글학회
- 김형정, "‘와’ 보충어의 분포 및 특성", 한글, (274), pp.99~128 (2006), 한글학회
- 김윤신, "활동(motion)·소비(consumption)·창조(creation) 동사의 사건 구조에 대한 연구", 인문논총, (52), pp.125~157 (2004), 인문학연구원
- 김윤신, "한국어 대상 이동 동사의 두 가지 의미 구조 : 교체형과 비교체형", 한국어 의미학, 17, pp.207~229 (2005), 한국어의미학회
- 김윤신, "구문의 구조와 의미", 제45회 국어학회 전국학술대회 발표 자료집, pp.177~188 (2018)
- 김윤신, "구문의 구조와 의미 -논항 교체 구문을 중심으로-", 國語學, (89), pp.285~312 (2019), 국어학회
- 남승호, "의미구조의 표상과 실현", pp.229~281 (2000), 소화출판사
- 남승호, "한국어 이동 동사의 의미구조와 논항교체", 어학연구, 39(1), pp.111~145 (2003)
- 남승호, "한국어 술어의 사건 구조와 논항" (2007), 서울대학교 출판부
- 박철우, "국어의 보충어와 부가어 판별 기준", 언어학, (34), pp.75~111 (2002), 사단법인 한국언어학회
- 연재훈, "국어 중립 동사 구문에 대한 연구", 한글, 203, pp.165~188 (1989)
- 연재훈, "문법 관계 교체 구문의 연구 -장소 보어 교체 구문과 소유주 인상 구문을 중심으로-", 한글, 232, pp.147~182 (1996)
- 우형식, "동사의 결합가 기술에 대한 방법론적 접근", 한글, 225, pp.83~108 (1994)
- 우형식, "국어에서의 보충어 범위", 배달말, 21, pp.29~74 (1995)
- 유현경, "논항과 부가어", 우리말글 연구, 1, pp.175~196 (1994)
- 이병규, "한국어 동사 구문의 잠재 논항 실현에 대하여", 석사, 국어국문, pp.1995
- 이병규, "국어 문법의 탐구III", pp.173~215 (1996), 태학사
- 이은섭, "보충어의 판별 문제와 어휘부 처리에 대한 시론", 어문학, (114), pp.87~118 (2011), 한국어문학회
- 鄭有珍, "국어의 補語 연구", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.1995
- Dowty, D. R., "The Dual Analysis of Adjunct", Complements in Categorial Grammar, 2000, pp.17, 53~78
- Pustejovsky, J., "Generative Lexicon Theory" (1995), The MIT Press
- Pustejovsky, J., "Polysemy: Theoretical and Computational Approaches", pp.68~90 (2000), Oxford University Press
- Somers, H. L., "Valency and Case in Computational Linguistics" (1987), Edinburgh University Press