논항관계와 문법성에 대한 연구
A Study on the Argument Relation and Grammaticality.
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The relationship among arguments has something to do with difference in meaning and sometimes grammaticality. In this paper I observed the relationship among subject argument, direct object argument and the object of prepositional phrase based on verbs. As a result this paper shows the followings. (1) While direct object argument has been directly, widely and physically influenced by subject argument, the object of PP has been indirectly, partially and abstractly influenced by subject argument because of distance. (2) Some transitive verbs allow alternation between direct object NP and prepositional phrase NP, but others do not. Alternation between them bring about difference in meaning and sometimes ungrammaticality. (3) These grammatical phenomena could be accounted for by prominent feature of verbs.
Abstract
The relationship among arguments has something to do with difference in meaning and sometimes grammaticality. In this paper I observed the relationship among subject argument, direct object argument and the object of prepositional phrase based on verbs. As a result this paper shows the followings. (1) While direct object argument has been directly, widely and physically influenced by subject argument, the object of PP has been indirectly, partially and abstractly influenced by subject argument because of distance. (2) Some transitive verbs allow alternation between direct object NP and prepositional phrase NP, but others do not. Alternation between them bring about difference in meaning and sometimes ungrammaticality. (3) These grammatical phenomena could be accounted for by prominent feature of verbs.
참고문헌 (15)
- 권경원, "불변화사 구문에 대한 연구", 언어연구, 23(3), pp.339~355 (2007)
- 이기동, "영어동사의 문법" (1994), 신아사
- Bolinger,Dwight, "Meaning and Form." (1977), New York:Longman Group Ltd
- Foley,William, "Semantic Parameters and the Unaccusative Split in the Austronesian Language Family", 29(2), pp.385~430 (2005)
- Goldberg,Adele, "Constructions:A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure." (1995), Chicago:University of Chicago Press
- Inagaki,Daisuke, "On the Locative Alternation.", Tsukuba English Studies, 8, pp.205~236 (1989)
- Iwata,Seizi, "Locative Alternation and Two Levels of Verb Meaning", Cognitive Linguistics, 16, pp.355~407 (2005)
- Jackendoff,Ray, "Semantic Structures." (1990), Cambridge:MIT Press
- Lakoff G, "Metaphors We Live By." (1980), Chicago:The University of Chicago Press
- Langacker,Ronald W, "Concept,Image,and Symbol." (1991), New York:Mouton de Gruyter
- Pinker, Steven, "Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure", Cambridge: Mit Press
- Radford,Andrew, "Transformational Syntax" (1981), .London:Cambridge U.Press
- Rappaport,M., "What to do with theta roles.In Wilkins Wendy(ed),Syntax and Semantics.21:Thematic Relations." (1988), New York:New York Academic Press
- Rappaport,M, "Building Verb Meanings.In Butt,Miriam and Wilhelm Geuder(eds).The Projection of Arguments:Lexical and Compositional Factors.", Stanford:CSLI Publications, 97~134 (1998)
- Rappaport,M, "An Event Structure Account of English Resultatives.", Language, 75, pp.766~797 (2001)