한일 무역 갈등을 둘러싼 한국 사회의 프레임 전쟁:신문 사설 제목을 중심으로
The framing war in the Korean society on the Korea-Japan trade conflict issue: Focusing on newspaper editorial titles
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to show that there is a wide cleavage of perception on the Korea-Japan trade conflict between conservatives and progressives in Korea, by analyzing more than one hundred editorial titles from four Korean daily newspapers issued July 1, 2019 through August 10, 2019, two of which are typically conservative and the other two are relatively progressive. It is argued that the cleavage can be attributed to different streams of conceptual metaphors and frames underlying those editorial titles. Whether conservative or progressive, most Koreans commonly conceptualize Japan as well as their own country, Korea, as a person who lives in a community, metaphorically thinking of THE TRADE CONFLICT AS A PHYSICAL BATTLE, in particular considering JAPAN AS A RASCAL. However, conservatives and progressives are sharply opposing in ways they conceive of the current Korean government, its capability to cope, and the best prospective solution. Conservatives tend to think of THE KOREAN GOVERNMENT AS A STUPID BONEHEAD and DEREGULATION AS THE BEST COUNTERMEASURE, while progressives conceive of THE KOREAN GOVERNMENT AS A CONFIDENT FIGHTER and REQUIRED REGULATION AS THE BEST COUNTERMEASURE.
Abstract
This paper aims to show that there is a wide cleavage of perception on the Korea-Japan trade conflict between conservatives and progressives in Korea, by analyzing more than one hundred editorial titles from four Korean daily newspapers issued July 1, 2019 through August 10, 2019, two of which are typically conservative and the other two are relatively progressive. It is argued that the cleavage can be attributed to different streams of conceptual metaphors and frames underlying those editorial titles. Whether conservative or progressive, most Koreans commonly conceptualize Japan as well as their own country, Korea, as a person who lives in a community, metaphorically thinking of THE TRADE CONFLICT AS A PHYSICAL BATTLE, in particular considering JAPAN AS A RASCAL. However, conservatives and progressives are sharply opposing in ways they conceive of the current Korean government, its capability to cope, and the best prospective solution. Conservatives tend to think of THE KOREAN GOVERNMENT AS A STUPID BONEHEAD and DEREGULATION AS THE BEST COUNTERMEASURE, while progressives conceive of THE KOREAN GOVERNMENT AS A CONFIDENT FIGHTER and REQUIRED REGULATION AS THE BEST COUNTERMEASURE.
참고문헌 (21)
- 권익수, "Charlie Hebdo 만평에 나타난 인지 기제 분석", 담화와 인지, 22(1), pp.1~23 (2015), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
- 권익수, "햇볕 정책, 그리고 개념적 은유", 담화와 인지, 22(3), pp.19~37 (2015), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
- 나익주, "조지 레이코프" (2017), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 나익주, "도덕성 은유와 프레임 전쟁:적폐 청산을 중심으로", 담화와 인지, 26(2), pp.1~25 (2019), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
- 이창봉, "정치은유와 프레임형성: '한국사 교과서 국정화' 정치 담화를 중심으로", 담화와 인지, 24(1), pp.69~92 (2017), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
- Edelman, Murray, "Politics as symbolic action: Mass arousal and quiescence" (1971), Markham
- Fillmore, Charles, , pp.111~137 (1982), Hanshin
- Fillmore, Charles, "Frames and the semantics of understanding", Quaderni di Semantica, 6(2), pp.222~254 (1985)
- Johnson, Mark, "Philosophical perspectives on metaphor" (1981), University of Minnesota Press
- Lakoff, George, "Metaphor and thought", pp.202~251 (1993), Cambridge University Press
- Lakoff, George, "Moral politics: How conservatives and liberals think" (2002), University of Chicago Press
- Lakoff, George, "Thinking points: Communicating Our American values and vision" (2006), Farrar, Straus and Giroux
- Lakoff, George, "Whose freedom?: The battle over America’s most important idea" (2006), Farrar, Straus and Giroux
- Lakoff, George, "The political mind: Why We can’t understand the 21st century politics with the 18th century reason" (2008), Penguin
- Lakoff, George, "Don’t think of an elephant!" (2014), Chelsea Green
- Lakoff George, "The little blue book: The essential guide to thinking and talking democratic" (2012), Free Press
- Lakoff George, "Your brain’s politics: How the science of mind explains the political divide" (2016), Societas
- Lakoff, George, "Metaphors we live by" (2002), University of Chicago Press
- Lakoff, George, "Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to the Western thoughts" (1999), University of Chicago Press
- Langacker, Ronald W., "Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction" (2008), Oxford University Press
- Schank, Roger, "Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge sructures" (1977), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates