의미 변화와 형식 변화
Meaning change and form change
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, examples of semantic changes preceding formal changes in particular grammatical changes in the history of Korean will be presented, and their reasons will be discussed. First, using the dative subject construction, I will investigate the mismatch between the grammatical role and the case marking strategy. Second, changes in the words ‘웃기다’ and ‘틀리다’ are used to show the retention of previous inflectional patterns despite a change in part of speech. I will also argue that the empty morphemes and the late change in the order of prefinal endings are transitional forms that appear because the meaning change and the form change did not take place simultaneously. This discrepancy in language change suggests that inflected words are not always generated online. The speaker has a propensity to maintain the linguistic form he or she heard. Hence, there are instances in which words composed of grammatical morphemes should not be interpreted logically and systematically. This is why we need to understand the history of language in order to develop a comprehensive synchronic grammar.
Abstract
In this study, examples of semantic changes preceding formal changes in particular grammatical changes in the history of Korean will be presented, and their reasons will be discussed. First, using the dative subject construction, I will investigate the mismatch between the grammatical role and the case marking strategy. Second, changes in the words ‘웃기다’ and ‘틀리다’ are used to show the retention of previous inflectional patterns despite a change in part of speech. I will also argue that the empty morphemes and the late change in the order of prefinal endings are transitional forms that appear because the meaning change and the form change did not take place simultaneously. This discrepancy in language change suggests that inflected words are not always generated online. The speaker has a propensity to maintain the linguistic form he or she heard. Hence, there are instances in which words composed of grammatical morphemes should not be interpreted logically and systematically. This is why we need to understand the history of language in order to develop a comprehensive synchronic grammar.
참고문헌 (34)
- 고영근, "중세국어의 시상과 서법" (1981), 탑출판사
- 김민국, "여격 주어 논의의 쟁점과 방향", 형태론, 19(1), pp.80~119 (2017)
- 김영욱, "공형태소에 대하여", 전농어문연구, 9, pp.181~198 (1997)
- 김태우, "{-삽-}의 기능 변화 연구" (2022), 태학사
- 나진석, "우리말의 때매김 연구" (1971), 과학사
- 박부자, "선어말어미 ‘--’ 통합순서의 변화에 대하여 -‘-시-’와의 통합을 중심으로-", 國語學, (46), pp.227~254 (2005), 국어학회
- 박진호, "국어의 시대별 변천 연구 3" (1998), 국립국어연구원
- 박진호, "보조사의 역사적 연구", 國語學, (73), pp.375~435 (2015), 국어학회[DOI]
- 석주연, "노걸대와 박통사의 언어" (2003), 태학사
- 안병희, "한국문화사대계 V", pp.165~261 (1967)
- 유필재, "현대국어 해라체 의문형 어미 ‘-느냐", 으냐, -니’의 변화, 2018, pp.54(1), 79~96[DOI]
- 이현희, "중세국어 구문연구" (1994), 신구문화사
- 이현희, "‘둏다’ 구문에 대한 통시적 연구", 진단학보, 87, pp.71~126 (1999)
- 임지룡, "‘틀리-’의 형용사 용법과 의미에 관한 연구", 어문학, (121), pp.53~72 (2013), 한국어문학회
- 장윤희, "공형태 분석의 타당성 검토", 형태론, 1(2), pp.227~244 (1999)
- 최동주, "국어 시상체계의 통시적 변화" (2015), 태학사
- Andersen, S. R., "A-morphous Morphology" (1992), Cambridge University Press
- Beard, R., "Indo-European Lexicon: A Full Synchronic Theory" (1981), North-Holland Publishing Company
- Bermúdez-Otero, R., "The Oxford Handbook of Historical Phonology", pp.375~400 (2015), Oxford University Press
- Bybee, J., "Morphology: A Study of the Relation Between Meaning and Form" (1985), John Benjamins
- Bybee, J., "The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World" (1994), The University of Chicago Press
- Cole, P., "The acquisition of subjecthood", Language, 56(4), pp.719~743 (1980)
- Haiman, J., "Perspectives on Grammaticalization", pp.3~28 (1994), John Benjamins
- Haspelmath, M., "Essais de typologie et de linguistique générale", pp.541~554 (2010), Presses de L'École Normale Supérieure
- Hofstadter, D., "사고의 본질: 유 추, 지성의 연료와 불길" (2017), 아르테
- Knott, J., "Subject, Voice and Ergativity", pp.53~59 (1995), School of Oriental and African Studies
- Labov, W., "Resolving the Neogrammarian controversy", Language, 57(2), pp.267~308 (1981)
- McCawley, J. D., "Studies in Linguistic Semantics", pp.97~113 (1971), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
- Michaelis, L., "Type shifting in construction grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion", Cognitive Linguistics, 15(1), pp.1~67 (2004)
- Mielke, J., "The Emergence of Distinctive Features" (2008), Oxford University Press
- Shibatani, M., "The Grammar of Causation and Interpersonal Manipulation" (2002), John Benjamins
- Stump, G., "Inflectional Morphology: A Theory of Paradigm Structure" (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Traugott, E., "On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change", Language, 65(1), pp.31~55 (1989)
- van der Auwera, J., "Modality’s semantic map", Linguistic Typology, 2, pp.79~124 (1998)