본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

태양추적식 자연채광 장치의 집광기 종류에 따른 성능 분석: 포물 반사경 vs. 프레넬 렌즈

Performance Analysis on Solar Tracking Daylighting Systems Using Different Types of Solar Collectors: Parabolic Dish vs. Fresnel Lens

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타공학

초록

This paper presents the effect of solar collectors on the performance of solar tracking daylighting systems. A series of measurements were made for two different types of solar collectors mounted on double axis solar trackers: Parabolic dish concentrator and Fresnel Lens. Indoor light levels were measured at different locations of an office space (longitude: 126.33 E, latitude 33.45 N) as photo sensors were placed on a task plane 80 cm above the floor. To accurately monitor the applicability of the systems, measurements were performed under clear and overcast sky conditions with the roll-screen (on the south window) in the down position. Comparing the illuminance data, the system with Fresnel lens outperformed that of parabolic dish concentrator. On clear days, the former delivered the light levels of 400~600 lux on the task plane whereas the latter recorded 100~200 lux. Depending on the amount of cloud cover, on overcast days, illuminance readings fluctuated to some extent.

Abstract

This paper presents the effect of solar collectors on the performance of solar tracking daylighting systems. A series of measurements were made for two different types of solar collectors mounted on double axis solar trackers: Parabolic dish concentrator and Fresnel Lens. Indoor light levels were measured at different locations of an office space (longitude: 126.33 E, latitude 33.45 N) as photo sensors were placed on a task plane 80 cm above the floor. To accurately monitor the applicability of the systems, measurements were performed under clear and overcast sky conditions with the roll-screen (on the south window) in the down position. Comparing the illuminance data, the system with Fresnel lens outperformed that of parabolic dish concentrator. On clear days, the former delivered the light levels of 400~600 lux on the task plane whereas the latter recorded 100~200 lux. Depending on the amount of cloud cover, on overcast days, illuminance readings fluctuated to some extent.

참고문헌 (7)

  1. Han, H. J., "Design and Preliminary Performance Test of A Daylighting Device with Mini-dishes", Proceedings of SET 2006 (2006)
  2. Olgyay, V. W., "Architectural Lighting" (2002), McGraw-Hill
  3. Augustesen, C., "Lighting Design" (2006), Birkhauser
  4. Han, H. H., "New Developments in Illumination, Heating and Cooling Technologies for Energy-efficient Buildings", Energy, 35, pp.2647~2653 (2010)
  5. 김정태, "반사거울형 태양광 채광시스템의 개발에 관한 연구", 대한건축학회논문집 계획계, 18(6), pp.109~116 (2002), 대한건축학회
  6. Oh, S. J., "Development of an AVR MCU-based Solar Tracker", Journal of Energy Engineering, 20(4), pp.353~357 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)