본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

정부출연연구기관의 기관평가에서목표 모호성의 영향에 관한 연구

Influence of Goal Ambiguity in Institutional Evaluation of Government-funded Research Institutes

구훈영
한국산업경영시스템학회 (KOREAN SOCIETY OF INDUSTRIAL AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING)|2020.12|한국산업경영시스템학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering)|제43권 제4호|pp. 84-92|DOI 10.11627/jkise.2020.43.4.084

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Goal AmbiguityOrganization PerformanceInstitutional Evaluation
주제분류산업공학

초록

In order to analyze the organizational performance of government-funded research institutes, four independent variables (organization size, organization age, evaluation system, organization location) and goal ambiguity were empirically analyzed. Although there are existing studies on institutional evaluation, which is the organizational performance of government-funded research institutes, there are differences in research in that it is an empirical analysis analyzed from the perspective of goal ambiguity and that the evaluation system, which is the specificity of institutional evaluation, is included in the analysis. As a result of the analysis, organizational location was the only independent variable that had a direct significant effect on organizational performance, and goal ambiguity showed a significant mediating effect for all independent variables. This indicates that goal ambiguity plays an important role in the organizational performance of government-funded research institutes, and to reduce this, increase the size of the organization, pay attention to establishment of the organization for organizational age, and that it is desirable to have an independent research group in the government department for the organization location. In addition, it was supported that the improvement effect of the evaluation system is proceeding in a desirable direction in terms of goal ambiguity.

Abstract

In order to analyze the organizational performance of government-funded research institutes, four independent variables (organization size, organization age, evaluation system, organization location) and goal ambiguity were empirically analyzed. Although there are existing studies on institutional evaluation, which is the organizational performance of government-funded research institutes, there are differences in research in that it is an empirical analysis analyzed from the perspective of goal ambiguity and that the evaluation system, which is the specificity of institutional evaluation, is included in the analysis. As a result of the analysis, organizational location was the only independent variable that had a direct significant effect on organizational performance, and goal ambiguity showed a significant mediating effect for all independent variables. This indicates that goal ambiguity plays an important role in the organizational performance of government-funded research institutes, and to reduce this, increase the size of the organization, pay attention to establishment of the organization for organizational age, and that it is desirable to have an independent research group in the government department for the organization location. In addition, it was supported that the improvement effect of the evaluation system is proceeding in a desirable direction in terms of goal ambiguity.

참고문헌 (54)

  1. 안은영, "임무중심형 종합평가에서 지질자원 분야 출연연구기관의 연구개발 우수성 평가지표연구", 자원환경지질, 49(4), pp.325~333 (2016), 대한자원환경지질학회[DOI]
  2. Anderson, D. M., "Goal Clarity, Task Significance, and Performance : Evidence from a Laboratory Experiment", Journal of Public Administration Re- search and Theory, 26(2), pp.211~225 (2016)
  3. Bae, B., "Amos 24 structural equation modeling" (2017), Cheongram
  4. 배정회, "한국의 국가연구개발 성과평가(1999～2013) 전개와 특징", 기술혁신연구, 22(4), pp.165~198 (2014), 기술경영경제학회[DOI]
  5. Botti, A., "Goal Ambiguity in Public Orga- nizations : A Systematic Literature Review", Internatio- nal Journal of Business and Management, 14(7), pp.137~ (2019)
  6. Boyne, G. A., "Sources of public service improvement :A critical review and research agenda", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(3), pp.367~394 (2013)
  7. 조현정, "자체평가 관대화에 대한 실증분석 - 국가연구개발사업을 중심으로 -", 한국혁신학회지, 10(2), pp.1~37 (2015), 한국혁신학회
  8. Choi, W., "A Study on the Factors and Influences of Changes in the Institutional Evaluation System-Focusing on the Institutional Evaluation System of Governmentfunded Research Institutes in the Science and Technology Field", Doctor, pp.2018
  9. 최영훈 백종윤, "정부출연연구기관의 기관평가지표체계의 성찰: BSC모형을 중심으로 한 탐색적 시도", 정부학연구, 12(1), pp.163~193 (2006), 정부학연구소
  10. Chun, Y. H., "Goal ambiguity and organizational performance in U.S. federal agencies", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(4), pp.529~557 (2005)
  11. Chun, Y. H., "Goal Ambiguity in U. S. Federal Agencies", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(1), pp.1~30 (2005)
  12. Gonzalez-Mule, E., "Channeled Autonomy : The Joint Effects of Autonomy and Feedback on Team Perfor-mance Through Organizational Goal Clarity", Journal of Management, 42(7), pp.2018~2033 (2016)
  13. 하연섭, "사업특성별 성과관리제도의 유효성에 관한 연구 : 2012년 재정사업 자율평가 결과를 중심으로", 한국행정연구, 22(3), pp.61~90 (2013), 한국행정연구원[DOI]
  14. 황병상, "정부출연연구기관평가의 발전방안 논고:기초기술연구회의 평가사례에 대한 메타평가를 중심으로", 한국정책학회보, 14(1), pp.121~149 (2005), 한국정책학회
  15. Jung, C. S., "Developing the concept of program goal ambiguity and explaining federal pro- gram performance", Academy of Management Procee- dings, (1), pp.1~6 (2008)
  16. Jung, C. S., "Extending the theory of goal ambiguity to programs : Examining the relation-ship between goal ambiguity and performance", Public Administration Review, 74(2), pp.205~219 (2014)
  17. Jung, C. S., "Developing and validating new concepts and measures of program goal ambiguity in the US federal government", Administration & Society, 44(6), pp.675~701 (2012)
  18. Jung, C. S., "Navigating a rough terrain of public manage-ment : Examining the relationship between organizational size and effectiveness", Journal of Public Admi-nistration Research and Theory, 23(3), pp.663~686 (2013)
  19. Jung, C. S., "Organizational goal ambiguity and perfor- mance : Conceptualization, measurement, and relation- ships", International Public Management Journal, 14(2), pp.193~217 (2011)
  20. Jung, C. S., "Why are goals important in the public sector? Exploring the benefits of goal clarity for reducing turnover intention", Journal of Public Administration Rese-arch and Theory, 24(1), pp.209~234 (2014)
  21. 김혜영, "정책목표 모호성이 정책집행에 미치는 영향", 국가정책연구, 20(1), pp.73~96 (2006), 국가정책연구소
  22. Kim, M., "A Study on the Improvement Plan for Evaluation of Government-funded Research Institutes in the Field of Science and Technology-Focusing on Management Performance Evaluation Indicators", Master, pp.2009
  23. 김서용, "공공조직에서 모호성이 조직효과성에 미치는 영향분석: 모호성의 유형별 효과와 공공봉사동기의 조절기능을 중심으로", 한국행정연구, 24(1), pp.139~171 (2015), 한국행정연구원[DOI]
  24. 김순영, "FA", AHP 기법을 활용한 국방연구개발사업 메타평가 지표 개발에 관한 연구, 2009, pp.12(1), 113~136[DOI]
  25. 2017 National R&D Project Top Evaluation Report (Intermediate Evaluation), "KISTEP", ~ (2018)
  26. 2018 Top evaluation report of research in- stitutes contributing to science and technology, "KISTEP", ~ (2019)
  27. 2019 National R&D Project Top Evaluation Report (Intermediate Evaluation), "KISTEP", ~ (2020)
  28. 2019 Top evaluation report of research in- stitutes contributing to science and technology, "KISTEP", ~ (2020)
  29. 구훈영, "제조업종 연구개발투자의 혁신 및 기업성과에서공동연구개발과 무형자산의 역할", 한국산업경영시스템학회지, 43(1), pp.79~86 (2020), 한국산업경영시스템학회[DOI]
  30. 권오영, "중앙행정기관 목표 모호성에 미치는 영향요인에 관한 연구 - 모니터링, 정치적 현저성을 중심으로 -", 한국정책학회보, 24(2), pp.363~390 (2015), 한국정책학회
  31. 권태욱, "목표모호성, 사업성과, 그리고 관리적 재량: 한국 행정부처의 재정사업 분석", 한국행정학보, 49(2), pp.119~147 (2015), 한국행정학회[DOI]
  32. 권태욱, "정책사업목표의 대상집단 모호성 : 목표모호성 하위차원의 개념, 측정, 그리고 타당화", 한국행정연구, 25(4), pp.149~174 (2016), 한국행정연구원[DOI]
  33. Lee, C., "Direction of development of evaluation system of government-funded research institutes : Focusing on evaluation cases of science and technology research institutes", Journal of the Korean Society for Policy Studies, 8(3), pp.325~349 (1999)
  34. 이찬구, "정부출연 연구기관 평가에서 지적자본 모형의 적용 필요성", 한국행정학보, 39(1), pp.195~217 (2005), 한국행정학회
  35. Lee, S., "Evaluation of the R&D performance of a govern- ment-funded research institute using DEA", Doctor, pp.2016
  36. Locke, E. A., "Goal setting and task performance : 1969-1980", Psychological Bulletin, 90(1), pp.125~152 (1981)
  37. Matland, R. E., "Synthesizing the implementation literature : The ambiguity-conflict model of policy imple-mentation", Journal of public administration research and theory, 5(2), pp.145~174 (1995)
  38. 남인석, "DEA 모형을 이용한 정부출연연구기관의 상대적 효율성 분석", 한국산업경영시스템학회지, 31(1), pp.1~10 (2008), 한국산업경영시스템학회
  39. 남영호, "과학기술계 출연연구기관 기관평가지표의 BSC 관점 분석", 기술혁신연구, 13(1), pp.265~293 (2005), 기술경영경제학회
  40. Noh, H., "A Study on the Compre-hensive Evaluation Model for Government-funded Rese-arch Institutes; Development of evaluation factors and weight setting", Journal of the Korean Society for Policy Studies, 5(1), pp.30~54 (1996)
  41. Pandey, S. K., "Connecting the dots in public management : Political environment, organizational goal ambiguity, and the public manager’s role ambiguity", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(4), pp.511~532 (2006)
  42. 박정호, "공공조직 성과분석을 위한 다차원지표 활용의 딜레마: 주관적 성과인식과 객관적 지표 비교를 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 49(2), pp.93~117 (2015), 한국행정학회[DOI]
  43. Pinder, C. C., "Work motivation in organizational beha-vior" (2014), Psychology Press
  44. Rainey, H. G., "A conceptual framework for analysis of goal ambiguity in public organizations", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), pp.71~99 (2015)
  45. Rainey, H. G., "Public Management and Performance", pp.34~59 (2013), Cambridge University Press
  46. Regan, P. M., "Personal information policies in the United States and Britain : The dilemma of implementation considerations", Journal of Public Policy, 4(1), pp.19~38 (1984)
  47. Rizzo, J. R., "Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations", Admini-strative Science Quarterly, 15(2), pp.150~163 (1970)
  48. Scriven, M., "An Introduction to Meta-Evaluation", Educ Prod Rep (1969)
  49. Song, S., "A Study on the Effect of Organizational Objective Ambiguity on Work Commitment-Focusing on the Moderating Effect of Boss Trust", Master, pp.2018
  50. van der Hoek, M., "Goal Setting in Teams : Goal Clarity and Team Performance in the Public Sector", Review of Public Personnel Admi-nistration, 38(4), pp.472~493 (2018)
  51. Wilson, J.Q., "Bureaucracy" (1989), Basic Books
  52. 양다연, "조직의 목표명확성이 조직구성원의 태도와 행동에 미치는 영향: 업무자율성, 상사피드백의 조절효과를 중심으로", 한국인사행정학회보, 18(3), pp.67~96 (2019), 한국인사행정학회
  53. 윤기웅, "사업평가에 영향을 미치는 요인 탐색 및 제도적 고찰 - 2008년～2010년 재정사업 자율평가결과를 중심으로 -", 한국정책학회보, 21(2), pp.91~122 (2012), 한국정책학회[DOI]
  54. 윤기웅, "정부 재정성과 측정결과의 영향요인 분석성과지표 특성과 사업 특성을 중심으로", 행정논총, 52(1), pp.63~94 (2014), 한국행정연구소

관련 논문AI추천

공공기관 경영평가 결과 영향요인에 관한 탐색적 연구정진용정부혁신연구소 · 정부행정2020 · 제16권 정부연구개발사업의 목표 부합성에 관한 연구- 목표 모호성과 관대화 오류를 중심으로구훈영한국혁신학회 · 한국혁신학회지2020 · 제15권 제4호조직 목표모호성이 직무특성과 혁신행동에 미치는 영향 : 업무자율성과 성과 피드백의 매개효과를 중심으로박세웅, 박소희한국행정연구원 · 한국행정연구2021 · 제30권 제1호공공조직의 목표모호성과 조직몰입에 관한 연구: 관료제 조직구조의 매개효과와 관리적 직위의 차별적 효과를 중심으로송성화한국조직학회 · 한국조직학회보2020 · 제17권 제1호개인의 역할모호성과 조직의 목표명확성이 조직성과와 업무성과에 미치는 영향 연구: P-J fit과 P-O fit의 매개효과를 중심으로박성민, 이가빈, 하선우한국인사행정학회 · 한국인사행정학회보2023 · 제22권 제3호목표모호성 인식이 공무원의 업무성과 인식에 미치는 영향: 역량증진과 기회증진의 조절효과를 중심으로이수영, 정주현한국인사행정학회 · 한국인사행정학회보2022 · 제21권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (24건)

유한 및 무한 용량 대기열을 가지는 선점 우선순위 M/G/1 대기행렬김길환pp. 1-14시계열 데이터를 활용한 항공 화물 물동량 영향 요인에 관한 연구 : 인천-상하이, 광저우, 톈진, 베이징을 중심으로한용희, 안정민, 문승진, 신승연, 박인무pp. 15-22작업완료시각 추정을 활용한 배치 스케줄링 및 사례 연구김송은, 김수민, 박경수, 박성현, 황민형, 성종은pp. 23-32텍스트 감정분석을 이용한 IT 서비스 품질요소 분석김홍삼, 김종수pp. 33-40FEM 시뮬레이션을 이용한 임펠러의 구조 안전성 평가정종윤pp. 41-47
원문 보기