경사지게 식립된 임플랜트 모형에서 지대주를 인상용 코핑으로 이용한 새로운 인상법의 정확성 비교 연구
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
연구목적: 시멘트 유지형 지대주를 인상용 코핑으로 이용하고 레진이나 금속 구조물에 접착하여 스플린팅하는 새로운 인상법을 시도하였 다. 연구의 목적은 첫 번째, 3개의 임플랜트가 15경사지게 식립된 모형에서 closed tray 인상법과 레진 스플린팅한 open tray 인상법의 정확성을 비교하는 것이고 두 번째, 새로운 인상법의 정확성을 앞의 두 가지 인상법과 비교하는 것이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 3개의 임플랜트 아날로그가 선상으로 배열되고 가운데 아날로그는 모형에 수직이고 양쪽 끝 아날로그는 이것에 앞뒤 로 15경사지게 배열된 주모형과 주모형에 잘 적합되는 기준구조물을 제작하였다. closed tray 인상법, 레진 스플린팅한 open tray 인상 법, 지대주-레진구조물 접착 인상법, 지대주-금속구조물 접착 인상법, 각 10개씩 40번의 인상을 채득하여 복제모형을 제작하였다. 이미지 처리할 수 있는 광학 현미경을 이용하여 기준구조물과 복제모형내의 아날로그와의 수직간격을 측정하여 인상의 정확성을 평가하였다. 통계 처리는 one-way ANOVA와 사후 검정으로 Tukey test를 5% 유의수준으로 시행하였다. 결과: closed tray 인상법;74.3 (±33.4)㎛의 간격은 레진 스플린팅한 open tray 인상법과 다른 두 가지 새로운 인상법보다 간격의 크 기가 통계적 유의성 있게 컸다(P<.05). 지대주-금속구조물 접착 인상법;42.5 (±11.9)㎛은 다른 인상법들 보다 간격의 크기가 통계적 유의 성 있게 작았다(P<.05). 지대주-레진구조물 접착 인상법;51.0 (±14.1)㎛은 레진 스플린팅한 open tray 인상법50.3 (±16.9)㎛과 통계 적 유의성 있는 차이를 보이지 않았다(P>.05). 결론: 이 연구의 한계 내에서, 레진 스플린팅한 open tray 인상법은 closed tray 인상법보다 우수한 정확성을 나타내었고, 지대주를 금 속구조물에 접착하는 새로운 인상법의 정확성은 레진 스플린팅한 open tray 인상법보다 우수하였다.
Abstract
Statement of problem: A new implant impression technique which use abutments as impression coping, and use resin cement as a splinting material was described. Accuracy of this technique was compared with conventional closed tray and resin splinted open tray technique for a 15angled 3-implant model Material and methods: A dental stone master model with 3 linearly positioned implant analogue and a reference framework which was passively fitted to it were fabricated. The center analogue was perpendicular to the plane of model and the outer analogues had a 15angulation forward or backward. 10 closed tray impressions, 10 resin splinted open tray impressions, 10 abutment-resin framework cementation impressions and 10 abutment-metal framework cementation impressions were made with additional silicone material and poured with dental stone. A light microscope with image processing was used to record the vertical gap dimension between reference framework and analogue of duplicated cast made with each 4 impression techniques. Statistical analysis used one-way ANOVA with post-hoc tests Tukey test of .05 level of significance Results: Significant difference in the vertical gap dimension was found between closed tray technique; 74.3 (±33.4)㎛ and resin splinted open tray technique, and two other new technique. (P<.05) Abutment-metal framework cementation technique;42.5 (±11.9)㎛ was significantly different from resin splinted open tray technique. (P<.05) Abutmentresin framework cementation technique;51.0 (±14.1)㎛ did not differ significantly from resin splinted open tray technique;50.3 (±16.9)㎛. (P>.05) Conclusion: Within limitations of this study, the accuracy of implant level impressions of resin splinted open tray technique was superior to that of closed tray technique. A new technique using abutment and metal framework cementation was more accurate than resin splinted open tray technique.
참고문헌 (30)
- Adell R., "A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw", Int J Oral Surg, 10, pp.387~416 (1981)
- Skalak R., "Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses", J Prosthet Dent, 49, pp.843~848 (1983)
- Conrad HJ, "Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants", J Prosthet Dent, 97, pp.349~356 (2007)
- Carr AB, "Comparison of impression techniques for a twoimplant 15-degree divergent model", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 7, pp.468~475 (1992)
- Carr AB, "A Comparison of Impression techniques for a five-implant mandibular model", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 6, pp.448~455 (1991)
- Phillips KM, "The Accuracy of three implant impression techniques: A threedimensional analysis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 9, pp.533~540 (1994)
- Choi JH, "Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internalconnection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 22, pp.761~768 (2007)
- Assuncao WG, "Evaluation of transfer impressions for osseointegrated implants at various angulations", Implant Dentistry, 13, pp.358~364 (2004)
- Assif D, "Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material", J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14, pp.885~888 (1999)
- Assif D, "Accuracy of implant impression techniques", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 11, pp.216~222 (1996)
- Vigolo P, "Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions", J Prosthet Dent, 89, pp.186~192 (2003)
- Vigolo P, "Master cast accuracy in single-tooth implant replacement cases: an in vitro comparison. A technical note", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 20, pp.455~460 (2005)
- Assif D, "Comparative accuracy of implant impression procedures", Int J Periodont Rest Dent, 12, pp.113~121 (1992)
- Naconecy MM, "Evaluation of accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19, pp.192~198 (2004)
- Wee AG, "Strategies to achieve fit in implant prosthodontics: A review of the literature", Int J Prosthodont, 12, pp.167~178 (1999)
- De La Cruz JE, "verification jig for implant-supported prostheses: A comparison of standard impressions with verification jigs made of different materials", J Prosthet Dent, 88, pp.329~336 (2002)
- Osman SA, "Film thickness and rheological properties of luting agents for crown cementation", Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 14, pp.23~27 (2006)
- Mojon P, "Polymerization shrinkage of index and pattern acrylic resins", J Prosthet Dent, 64, pp.684~688 (1990)
- Feilzer AJ, "Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration", J Dent Res, 66, pp.1636~1639 (1987)
- Balkenhol M, "Mechanical properties of provisional crown and bridge materials; chemical-curing versus dual-curing systems", J Dent, 36, pp.15~20 (2008)
- Plotino G, "Flexural properties of endodontic posts and human root dentin", Dent Mater, 23, pp.1129~1135 (2007)
- Ma T, "Tolerance measurements of various implant components", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 12, pp.371~375 (1997)
- Assif D, "Comparative accuracy of implant impression procedures", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 12, pp.112~121 (1992)
- Vigolo P, "Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions", J Prosthet Dent, 89, pp.186~192 (2003)
- Vigolo P, "An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses", J Prosthet Dent, 92, pp.470~476 (2004)
- Herbst D, "Evaluation of impression accuracy for osseointegrated implant supported superstructures", J Prosthet Dent, 83, pp.555~561 (2000)
- Humphries RM, "The accuracy of implant master casts constructed from transfer impressions", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 5, pp.331~336 (1990)
- Burns J, "Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparisson of stock versus custom trays", J Prosthet Dent, 89, pp.250~255 (2003)
- Wee AG, "Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions", J Prosthet Dent, 83, pp.323~331 (2000)
- Kim SJ, "Displacement of implant components from impressions to definitive casts", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 21, pp.747~755 (2006)