본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

임플란트 인상채득 방법과 인상용 코핑 연결 고정에 따른 정확성 비교

Comparative accuracy of implant impression techniques with different splinting materials

신수연|홍기윤
대한턱관절교합학회 (Korean academy of stomatognathic function and occlusion)|2023.03|구강회복응용과학지 (Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science)|제39권 제1호|pp. 9-20

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

정확성accuracyimpression아크릴릭 레진acrylic resin인상 채득
주제분류치의학

초록

목적: 하악 부분 무치악 모형에서 pick-up type 인상용 코핑을 사용한 개방형 인상 채득법과 transfer type 인상용 코핑을 사용한 폐쇄형 인상 채득법, 개방형 인상 채득법에서 pick-up type 인상용 코핑 고정 재료에 따른 인상 채득 정확성을 비교 하고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 하악 부분 무치악 모형의 좌측 구치부에 직경 4.5 mm, 길이 11.5 mm의 임플란트 고정체 두 개 식립 후 3D 프린터를 이용하여 개방형 개인 트레이 30개 폐쇄형 개인 트레이 10개를 제작하였다. 제작한 개인 트레이를 이용하여 PN군: 개방형 인상 채득법(non-splint), PG군: 개방형 인상 채득법(splint GC pattern resin), PH군: 개방형 인상 채득법(splint Herifix), TN군: 폐쇄형 인상 채득법으로 나누어 각 군당 10회씩 총 40회의 인상 채득을 진행하였다. 인상채득 후 석고 모형을 제작하여 모델 스캐너로 스캔 후 역설계 프로그램으로 스캔오차를 측정하여 95% 유의수준으로 평가하였다. 결과: 폐쇄형 인상 채득법 TN군이 개방형 인상 채득법 PN군 보다 더 낮은 오차값을 보였다. 개방형 인상 채득법(splint)에 사용된 인상용 코핑 고정 재료 간의 비교 결과에서는 PH군에서 가장 낮은 오차값을 보였으며 PN군, PG군 순으로 정확한 인상 채득 정확성을 보여주었다. 결론: 임플란트 인상 채득 방법이나 인상용 코핑의 연결 고정 유무에 따른 각 군 간의 정확성에 유의한 차이는 없다.

Abstract

Purpose: We investigated the effect of open tray impression using pick-up impression coping and close tray impression using transfer impression coping on the accuracy of impression in edentulous patients on their mandibular parts. the effect of material types of pick-up type impression copings for splinting in open tray impression on the accuracy of impression was also evaluated. Materials and Methods: Two implant fixtures were implanted in parallel in the left molar of the mandibular in the shape of a mandibular partial edentulous model. The 40 individual trays were fabricated using 3D printer. The prepared individual trays were classified into 4 groups (i.e., PN, PG, PH, and TN groups), and a total of 40 impression-takings were conducted. A master cast was connected to a Scan Body. The converted STL file was super-imposed on the scan images of the various groups. Results: The order of standard deviation values decreased as follows: PN (0.2343 ± 0.0844 mm), TN (0.2192 ± 0.0840 mm), indicating that the high accuracy of impression for TN group. In addition, for the comparison results between the material types used in splinting the open tray impression, the PH group showed a relatively lower standard deviation (0.1910 ± 0.1176 mm) than that of the PN group (0.2343 ± 0.0844 mm), PG group (0.2556 ± 0.1082 mm). Conclusion: The acrylic resin synthesized by light-induced polymerization exhibited a higher accuracy of impression taking than that of autopolymerizing acrylic resin. Meanwhile, the accuracy of impression taking was not dependent on the implant impression taking method or the presence of connection/fixation of impression copings.

참고문헌 (46)

  1. Adell R, "A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw", Int J Oral Surg, 10, pp.387~416 (1981)
  2. Zarb GA, "The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants in anterior partially edentulous patients", Int J Prosthodont, 6, pp.180~188 (1993)
  3. Jemt T, "In vitro measurements of precision of fit of implant-supported frameworks. A comparison between "virtual" and "physical" assessments of fit using two different techniques of measurements", Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 14(Suppl 1), pp.e175~82 (2012)
  4. Kan JY, "Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit", J Prosthet Dent, 81, pp.7~13 (1999)
  5. Cheshire PD, "An in vivo quantitative analysis of the fit of Nobel Biocare implant superstructures", J Oral Rehabil, 23, pp.782~789 (1996)
  6. Sellers GC, "Direct assembly framework for osseointegrated implant prosthesis", J Prosthet Dent, 62, pp.662~668 (1989)
  7. Becker W, "Clinical and microbiologic findings that may contribute to dental implant failure", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 5, pp.31~38 (1990)
  8. Skalak R, "Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses", J Prosthet Dent, 49, pp.843~848 (1983)
  9. Sones AD, "Complications with osseointegrated implants", J Prosthet Dent, 62, pp.581~585 (1989)
  10. Winter W, "Bone loading caused by different types of misfits of implantsupported fixed dental prostheses : a three-dimensional finite element analysis based on experimental results", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 25, pp.947~952 (2010)
  11. Kim Y, "Occlusal considerations in implant therapy : clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale", Clin Oral Implants Res, 16, pp.26~35 (2005)
  12. Henry PJ, "An alternative method for the production of accurate casts and occlusal records in osseointegrated implant rehabilitation", J Prosthet Dent, 58, pp.694~697 (1987)
  13. Tautin FS, "Impression making for osseointegrated dentures", J Prosthet Dent, 54, pp.250~251 (1985)
  14. Carr AB, "Comparison of impression techniques for a five-implant mandibular model", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 6, pp.448~455 (1991)
  15. Humphries RM, "The accuracy of implant master casts constructed from transfer impressions", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 5, pp.331~336 (1990)
  16. Phillips KM, "The accuracy of three implant impression techniques : A three-dimensional analysis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 9, pp.533~540 (1994)
  17. Rodney J, "Dimensional accuracy of two implant impression copings", J Dent Res, 70, pp.385~ (1991)
  18. Brånemark PI, "Tissue integrated prostheses. Osseointegration in clinical dentistry", Plast Reconstr Surg, 77, pp.496~497 (1986)
  19. Hsu CC, "A comparative analysis of the accuracy of implant transfer techniques", J Prosthet Dent, 69, pp.588~593 (1993)
  20. Herbst D, "Evaluation of impression accuracy for osseointegrated implant supported superstructures", J Prosthet Dent, 83, pp.555~561 (2000)
  21. Inturregui JA, "Evaluation of three impression techniques for osseointegrated oral implants", J Prosthet Dent, 69, pp.503~509 (1993)
  22. Burawi G, "A comparison of the dimensional accuracy of the splinted and unsplinted impression techniques for the Bone-Lock implant system", J Prosthet Dent, 77, pp.68~75 (1997)
  23. Assif D, "Accuracy of implant impression techniques", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 11, pp.216~222 (1996)
  24. Naconecy MM, "Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 19, pp.192~198 (2004)
  25. Vigolo P, "Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions", J Prosthet Dent, 89, pp.186~192 (2003)
  26. Cabral LM, "Comparative analysis of 4impression techniques for implants", Implant Dent, 16, pp.187~194 (2007)
  27. Binon PP, "Evaluation of machining accuracy and consistency of selected implant standard abutments and laboratory analogues", Int J Prosthodont, 8, pp.162~178 (1995)
  28. Lee H, "The accuracy of implant impressions : a systematic review", J Prosthet Dent, 100, pp.285~291 (2008)
  29. Carr AB, "Comparison of impression techniques for a two-implant 15-degree divergent model", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 7, pp.468~475 (1992)
  30. Daoudi MF, "An evaluation of three implant level impression techniques for single tooth implant", Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 12, pp.9~14 (2004)
  31. Conrad HJ, "Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants", J Prosthet Dent, 97, pp.349~356 (2007)
  32. Wenz HJ, "Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 23, pp.39~47 (2008)
  33. Barrett MG, "The accuracy of six impression techniques for osseointegrated implants", J Prosthodont, 2, pp.75~82 (1993)
  34. Assuncao WG, "Evaluation of transfer impressions for osseointegrated implants at various angulations", Implant Dent, 13, pp.358~366 (2004)
  35. Del’Acqua MA, "Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 23, pp.226~236 (2008)
  36. De La Cruz JE, "Verification jig for implant-supported prostheses : A comparison of standard impressions with verification jigs made of different materials", J Prosthet Dent, 88, pp.329~336 (2002)
  37. Kim S, "Displacement of implant components from impressions to definitive casts", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 21, pp.747~755 (2006)
  38. Assif D, "Comparative accuracy of implant impression procedures", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 12, pp.112~121 (1992)
  39. Vigolo P, "An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses", J Prosthet Dent, 92, pp.470~476 (2004)
  40. Wee AG, "Comparison of impression materials for direct multi‑implant impressions", J Prosthet Dent, 83, pp.323~331 (2000)
  41. Daoudi MF, "A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of the repositioning impression coping technique at the implant level for single-tooth implants", Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 11, pp.23~28 (2003)
  42. Assif D, "Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques : effect of splinting material", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 14, pp.885~888 (1999)
  43. Selvaraj S, "Comparison of implant cast accuracy of multiple implant impression technique with different splinting materials : An in vitro study", J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 16, pp.167~175 (2016)
  44. Papaspyridakos P, "Digital evaluation of three splinting materials used to fabricate verification jigs for fullarch implant prostheses : a comparative study", J Esthet Restor Dent, 29, pp.102~109 (2017)
  45. 이상직, "Accuracy of five implant impression technique: effect of splinting materials and methods", The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics, 3(4), pp.177~185 (2011), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
  46. Mojon P, "Polymerization shrinkage of index and pattern acrylic resins", J Prosthet Dent, 64, pp.684~688 (1990)

관련 논문AI추천

새로운 인상용 코핑을 이용한 임플란트 인상법의 정확성에 대한 3차원적 비교 연구고석민, 김세라, 김인수, 박성재, 이병옥대한턱관절교합학회 · 구강회복응용과학지2010 · 제26권 제3호임플란트 인상 채득 시 트레이 종류에 따른 인상체의 정확도에 관한 비교 연구이준석, 이현정, 임종화대한치과보철학회 · 대한치과보철학회지2010 · 제48권 제01호인상용 트레이의 종류와 인상용 코핑의 연결고정이 임플랜트 주모형의 정확성에 미치는 영향이지혁, 조인호, 최유성대한턱관절교합학회 · 구강회복응용과학지2010 · 제26권 제4호경사지게 식립된 임플랜트 모형에서 지대주를 인상용 코핑으로 이용한 새로운 인상법의 정확성 비교 연구김명주, 김창회, 이혁재, 임영준대한치과보철학회 · 대한치과보철학회지2008 · 제46권 제2호스캔 힐링 어버트먼트를 이용한 임플란트 인상 채득법과 기존 임플란트 인상 채득법의 진실도 비교 연구권긍록, 김형섭, 노관태, 배아란, 백장현, 정권우, 홍성진대한치과보철학회 · 대한치과보철학회지2025 · 제63권 제1호폐구인상채득법을 이용한 임플란트 인상채득 증례강은숙, 김소연, 김주현, 윤미정, 전혜미, 정경화대한턱관절교합학회 · 구강회복응용과학지2017 · 제33권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

치주수술 후 치아상실에 대한 환자관련, 치아관련 위험요소 - 후향적 연구휴팜동, 송종근, 이성조, 신현승, 조인우pp. 1-8한국 청소년의 정신건강 요인과 구강 증상 경험의 관련성홍민희, 최다예, 배정희pp. 21-31제1대구치 위치에 식립된 단일 임플란트의 지대주 연결 유형에 따른 임플란트 주위골 흡수이은우, 김옥수, 정하나, 이석현pp. 32-44Lid technique을 활용하여 치근단 수술에서 역충전을 시행한 증례 보고이윤주, 이윤, 김진우, 박세희, 조경모pp. 45-51Replantation of autotransplanted mature third molar in anterior open bite patient: case report김희진pp. 52-60
원문 보기